Pal, you don't know what you are getting into. That series went the distance! Like 7-9 books long.I just started How Few Remain by Harry Turtledove.
It's an alternate history novel that tells of the second American civil war in the 1880's. It's also the first book in Turtledove's Timeline-191 series.
Pal, you don't know what you are getting into. That series went the distance! Like 7-9 books long.I just started How Few Remain by Harry Turtledove.
It's an alternate history novel that tells of the second American civil war in the 1880's. It's also the first book in Turtledove's Timeline-191 series.
Has anyone read Steven Erikson's "Malazan Book of The Fallen" series? I ask because I saw it on the bookstore shelf today and it looked intriguing. I don't really like to read a lot of modern swords-and-sorcery, so I wouldn't mind a review or two.
Pal, you don't know what you are getting into. That series went the distance! Like 7-9 books long.I just started How Few Remain by Harry Turtledove.
It's an alternate history novel that tells of the second American civil war in the 1880's. It's also the first book in Turtledove's Timeline-191 series.
11 books, actually. Hellalong.
Right now I'm reading Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds.
Yeah, I've been reading more about it and it definitely sounds like something I'd be interested in. I just love big epics set in fascinating universes (well really, who doesn't like fascinating universes?), and this one seems to be particularly so. The fact that the author is Canadian is just one more reason to check it out.Has anyone read Steven Erikson's "Malazan Book of The Fallen" series? I ask because I saw it on the bookstore shelf today and it looked intriguing. I don't really like to read a lot of modern swords-and-sorcery, so I wouldn't mind a review or two.
Unbelievably complicated, but VERY rewarding.
This is a series projected to be 10 books long, with some books around 1000 pages, so it's a bit of a commitment, but Erikson knows how to craft a world. It's also not very linear. You'll find that one book will focus on a certain group of characters, and then you won't see them again till two installments later.
I will say that the first book is the weakest. It drops you into the middle of the story, and I had no idea what was happening for the first two hundred pages. It really picks up after that, and I'm glad that Gardens of the Moon held my interest enough to keep with it. The 2nd and 3rd books, are really powerful, with some marvelous characters. But it isn't until the fourth and fifth books that all the disparate plotlines start to form something cohesive.
I personally think that the Malazan series is great, and would urge you to give it a shot.
So, you see it's more a play on words/ideas than anything else, but it's a bit of an interesting way of putting it.Modern literature offers us no Unities, so I have turned to science and am trying to complete a four-decker novel whose form is based on the relativity proposition.
Three sides of space and one of time constitute the soup-mix recipe of a continuum. The four novels follow this pattern.
[...]
The subject-object relation is so important to relativity that I have tried to turn the novel through both subjective and objective modes. The third part, Mountolive, is a straight naturalistic novel in which the narrator of Justine and Balthazar becomes an object, i.e. a character.
This is not Proustian or Joycean method--for they illustrate Bergsonian "Duration" in my opinion, not "Space-Time".
[...]
These considerations sound perhaps somewhat immodest or even pompous. But it would be worth trying an experiment to see if we cannot discover a morphological form one might appropriately call "classical"--for our time. Even if the result proved to be a "science-fiction" in the true sense.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.