The Enemy
Picard's look of skepticism when Riker says "Tomalak said one so that must mean there are more" (without evidence, no wonder Scotty yells in TUC about looking like fools a couple years later in the theater, but I digress) says it all: Both "Where's the evidence" and "You're probably right, regardless" re conveyed simultaenously and it's fantastic. Indeed, Riker is channeling lots of Worfisms throughout and it's a joy to watch. Actually, the Worf/Riker scenes, the Riker/Picard scenes, and Picard/Tomalak scenes are all top tier (notice Picard throughout the entire story, it's no wonder the Borg wanted him) and even the Geordi/Bochra scenes are compelling (the first Federation/Romulan venture is robust indeed

, even if Bochra is quick to figure out which tricorder bits can be rigged into the VISOR so neatly and under those conditions, but I won't simmer on this one either.)
Dennis McCarthy hits a home run with the musical score, TNG was in the all stars for this season regarding musical cues and scores for sure.
As always, Wes belches out the solution, but it's season 3 and has had character refinement and this is still in-character for him. No wonder Barclay got upset at him (I can't wait to get back to "Hollow Pursuits".)
As with Picard, Geordi gets some excellent material. Even if he is sarcastic, reaching levels that Maxwell Smart would do except TNG remembers it is not a farcical comedy and keeps the proceedings from being total satire.
The planet's set is magnificent, and I love when TNG has the crew going to planets that are hostile to biological life, either nasty fauna and flora, or poison atmopsheres requiring precautions or limited times exploring.
The other Romulan was called "Patahk", no relation to "pet rock". For some reason, later stories use this word as profanity than a character name. Is this story really that forgettable like how pet rocks were? Now imagine how many people name their kids with swear words... but that's from our perspective, not Romulans', though it's all probably a coincidence that a name that sounded cool but not verbally uttered would be done so later as a swear and carried with such verve in "The Defector" (which I'm itching to get to as well). Or the names are phonetically very similar, I mean, look up the name of the 1980 video game "Puck-Man" and why they changed it to "Pac-Man" if you need as much solace as I did a moment ago until now.
Technically speaking, WW2 began in 1939. Not 1941. Picard's dialogue citing a "preamble" needed a minor tweak to make the historical event's namedropping as a tie-in to a
preamble more believable as a war having gone on for 2 years had a preamble before the war started, not 2 years into it.
More about Geordi's
Commodore quips, being 1989 and all, why no
Atari ST quips? For more on this utterly dumb digression, go to a web search engine and type in "Commodore vs Atari ST wars"** and get a nice quart of coffee to sip on while reading and eating dozens of crumpets and Twinkies in the process.
While people make parallels to "Enemy Mine", that movie also relies on an established and old trope that it did the same thing on (
The Defiant Ones,
Hail to the Pacific, others...), repackaging an old idea with new ones and both movie and TNG episode hold their own and are deservedly spectacular, nitpicks or not.
Well, one bit of good news for the other subplot (which has a few great points but one contrivance) is that Dr Crusher is right in that blood's molecular structure is too complex for replicator (even plants and foodstuffs don't come close.) The bad news is, the story is contriving way too much to make Worf the
only one who can save the Patahk's life whereas the biologically near-identical (by DNA standards) Vulcans all have too many imperfections all of a sudden, surprise surprise. Especially when Beverly goes all after school special in telling Worf (and the audience by extension) how all comparable blood is amongst most species. Not even a mention of 1667's first transfusion from a lamb to a human as a tie-in parallel to make the contrived situation feel authentic. (Then again, the
reason for using a sheep is the greatest loose association of all time, but thankfully it had worked and without complications... and the practice was said to be discontinued after human blood type groups were discovered and confirmed in the early-20th century, and no microscope was required.) But contrivance aside, there are so many connected scenes that simply work wonders and more than make up for any nitpickery. Apart from one,
doesn't Bev have any dialogue better than spewing recycled Dr McCoy lines about practicing "old fashioned country medicine"?*
If absolutely nothing else, who changed the bulbs in Picard's ready room to flash red?
While "Contagion" was the first great Romulan story in TNG (which isn't saying much), "The Enemy" is the first superlatively excellent tale. Oh, I'll nitpick, every story's got nits to pick and picks of nit, but the real question is:
Is the sum greater than its parts? Easily. Season 3 continues a high quality, solid run.
* Well, McCoy only said the old time country lemonade thing in "The Deadly Years", but Crusher and the EMH have both done more McCoyisms than Pulaski ever had yet only Pulaski is pointed to as being a McCoy Ripoff, of which that might be easier to believe if Pulaski spouted McCoy lines (she only had a character trait of disliking transporters, for biological reasons relevant to her field, and if people say Data isn't a ripoff of Spock then there is no way Pulaski is a ripoff of McCoy.) Now there's a digression!
** here are a couple videos to start you off, happy nineties nerding!
(need an eagle eye on this one, but the ST is easily the winner)