Those are some very interesting properties to retain it's Nano Structure at 17°C, and the fact that it can be easily adjusted later on.
TL;DR: Within Computer Simulated models you're only able to predict 129 Days into the future with any amount of reasonable accuracy without new inputs based on what actually happened in the real world as base info.
Assuming you're feeding in actual accurate data in real time and updating your model constantly, you have a ~129 Day Rolling Window of reasonable accuracy moving forwards.
Very interesting that there seems to be hard limits to accurate predictions of very complex systems like the environment on Earth.
So 129 Days is a little bit more than ⅓ of a Year into the future (~34.615% of a Year).
imagine if we could time travel in both the mcu avengers 4 style and also the old school traditional style
the mcu avengers 4 style is where you time travel to the past and if you try to change anything then the future in the current timeline does not change a thing and still stays the same where the future in the past you were just in only starts a new alternate reality
and of course theres the old school traditional style where you time travel to the past and if you change anything then the future timeline is alternated and changed
the mcu avengers 4 style is where you time travel to the past and if you try to change anything then the future in the current timeline does not change a thing and still stays the same where the future in the past you were just in only starts a new alternate reality
and of course theres the old school traditional style where you time travel to the past and if you change anything then the future timeline is alternated and changed
Dr who did it in a fun way too when Ruby Sunday my favourite new companion stepped on a butterfly but instantly was mutated by doing that, but the Doctor fixed that in no time flat before she could even notice
I read at Hackaday where neutrino lasers aren't possible--yet I read this today:
phys.org
Might this be of use in propulsion?
Light beam 'swims' upstream through a quantum fluid by violating Newton's third law
Just as a leaf drifts along with a stream, objects in other moving fluids normally drift along with the flow. That is, unless they exert energy to move against it. Although it may be less intuitive, light waves or photons work similarly. To move against a stream of light, an object or particle...
Might this be of use in propulsion?
Cool video by Cleo Abram about our Sun. OK Yeah posted this just as I hit the sack.
So the video was really interesting in that there were things I learned I didn't know before such as our whole solar system is actually inside the outermost part of the Sun's atmosphere, the heliosphere which is a bubble that encircles our whole solar system and is caused by the outward motion of the solar wind, the particles that constantly eject from the Sun. It also extends beyond the orbit of Pluto.
I also liked how they dissected the Sun in this presentation and explained all of the various layers underneath the corona, which is what we'd call the surface of the sun, that's the part you see during a total solar eclipse.
So the video was really interesting in that there were things I learned I didn't know before such as our whole solar system is actually inside the outermost part of the Sun's atmosphere, the heliosphere which is a bubble that encircles our whole solar system and is caused by the outward motion of the solar wind, the particles that constantly eject from the Sun. It also extends beyond the orbit of Pluto.
I also liked how they dissected the Sun in this presentation and explained all of the various layers underneath the corona, which is what we'd call the surface of the sun, that's the part you see during a total solar eclipse.
Last edited:
I'll correct that in a little while
imagine doing the mcu avengers 4 style time traveling where you travel to the past and change a bunch of stuff and they just create a bunch of new time streams while the current present just stays the same
and also imagine doing the basic style of time traveling where you travel to the past and change stuff then return the present where its different
and also imagine doing the basic style of time traveling where you travel to the past and change stuff then return the present where its different
Are you stoned, like seriously?
In a recent discussion I was having with Gemini, we talked about the many worlds quantum theory and the theories of Superdeterminism.
Apparently, the proponents of the Many Worlds theory have explained the paradox of out of control exponential multiplication of energy, to maintain the conservation of energy law, by suggesting the multi-verse is constant, and that each collapse of a quantum state into its final determined state is actually a division of the energy into two half energy states, to put it simply. That would mean, for each collapse of a quantum state, a new universe with half the energy of the parent universe would be created and the energy of the parent universe would lose half its energy. This is sustainable as a perspective of scale. Even though we lose half our energy with every collapsing quantum state, and a new universe is created with the lost half of the energy, we can't experience that lost energy since we are also losing half our scale. That is to say, our ruler is shrinking right along with what we are measuring.
The problems I see with that lie in the universal constants. Where light speed has a cap, we are either seeing light continuing to travel at its constant between distances that must also remain constant during this split, or light speed is not constant and slows right along with the physical shrinking of the Universe. That, along with Plank's Constant for quantum energy remaining indivisible, it is either a true constant, or it can be divided with every new universe. The only other way that could work is to see the creation of energy from nothing and the multi-verse isn't the constant, as more and more energy is added per division. The funny thing is, that were we able to see, and thus measure, the energy in the multi-verse, from our apparently constant energy state single-verse, whether the multi-verse remained constant or it actually increased it's energy level, we could only see it as increasing. Our own universe would always appear to be the constant.
-Will
Apparently, the proponents of the Many Worlds theory have explained the paradox of out of control exponential multiplication of energy, to maintain the conservation of energy law, by suggesting the multi-verse is constant, and that each collapse of a quantum state into its final determined state is actually a division of the energy into two half energy states, to put it simply. That would mean, for each collapse of a quantum state, a new universe with half the energy of the parent universe would be created and the energy of the parent universe would lose half its energy. This is sustainable as a perspective of scale. Even though we lose half our energy with every collapsing quantum state, and a new universe is created with the lost half of the energy, we can't experience that lost energy since we are also losing half our scale. That is to say, our ruler is shrinking right along with what we are measuring.
The problems I see with that lie in the universal constants. Where light speed has a cap, we are either seeing light continuing to travel at its constant between distances that must also remain constant during this split, or light speed is not constant and slows right along with the physical shrinking of the Universe. That, along with Plank's Constant for quantum energy remaining indivisible, it is either a true constant, or it can be divided with every new universe. The only other way that could work is to see the creation of energy from nothing and the multi-verse isn't the constant, as more and more energy is added per division. The funny thing is, that were we able to see, and thus measure, the energy in the multi-verse, from our apparently constant energy state single-verse, whether the multi-verse remained constant or it actually increased it's energy level, we could only see it as increasing. Our own universe would always appear to be the constant.
-Will
Last edited:
I wouldn't rely on Gemini for help, or any AI tool, just saying.
Last edited:
I have found that Gemini has been helpful in relating the published general concepts for me. I'm sure there are missing and even erroneous bits of information it gives. I've discovered a few mistakes, but it doesn't usually get science and philosophy overviews wrong. It does have access to much of the same information I would be searching the Web for without Gemini. However, you make a great point. For building my trans-multiverse transport, I will be sure to fact check everything it says. I wouldn't want to have my transporter try to collapse my waveforms into two or more different universes at once. 
That just sounds like a state of diminishing returns. 
-Will
That just sounds like a state of diminishing returns. -Will
So there's another question. If the creation of matter is always coupled by antimatter (the mathematical balancing), and a pair of entangled quantum particles remain entangled no matter the distance, can entangled particles be or remain entangled across multiple universes? Might the antimatter that is created with matter actually create a universe division? That could be where all that antimatter is going. This might be the way to explore other universes. We could collapse a quantum particle into a divided multiverse and measure the collapsed form we see, to learn about the matter in the other universe we can't see.
-Will
-Will
