How would you have written them?The Suliban and Xindi would have done way better in the 25th century.
Well, no insectoids variant, and definitely have them as a power rising in the wake of the Dominion losing influence and expanding more.How would you have written them?
Well, no insectoids variant, and definitely have them as a power rising in the wake of the Dominion losing influence and expanding more.
This is only controversial if your first best first season is somehow Enterprise season one.Prodigy season one is the second best first season in the history of the franchise.
Enterprise didn't even have the best premier episode of Star Trek.I love ENT and I would never rank ENT as the best Season 1.
Every second of Trek is a controversy.
The Xindi are pretty cool but I don't really like how they where executed. The Aquatics don't get much screen time and the Species kind of sick to their own group too much. would have been cooler if their internal conflict was over something more interesting than species rivalry.Unpopular opinion:
The Xindid alliance on ENT is just the absolute best.
The reptile & arboreal face-masks are at the absolute peak and rival even modern Star Wars.
And the insectoids & Aquarians are nothing but audacious for a tv show. Nothing since then ever came close. Even the primates are one of the better alien make-ups to this day.
If it weren't for the unpopularity of ENT at that time already, they would be as popular as villains as the OG Klingons, the Borg or the Dominion.
Yes, they definitely fell into the "scary looking ones are evil, nice looking ones are friendly"-trap.The Xindi are pretty cool but I don't really like how they where executed. The Aquatics don't get much screen time and the Species kind of sick to their own group too much. would have been cooler if their internal conflict was over something more interesting than species rivalry.
Also the mammals rule reptiles and bugs drool vibe was weird. and it's even weirder that Archer and presumably the Audience are supposed get invested in it. Kind of lame that the Guys that look like archer are redeemable and the Ugly Different ones are villainous.
Well the beauty of this thread is - you can voice any non-majority opinion here, that in any other thread just gets you swarmed & shitstormed.who would have thought there would be over 1000 pages of the what your controversial star trek opinions thread
there is probley who knows millions of different controversies in the history of star trek since 1966

And turns out - almost everyone of us holds quite a few non-majority opinions.![]()
Because they drifted off course.Everything after WNMHGB is a continuity error.
Michael Burnham is a good character AND the first two seasons of disco sucked.
I wasn't on board per say until they dumped Georgiou in s3, I love the actress but that Character gave me psychic damage whenever she was on screen. The season 3 concept was great, I think it could have been executed a lot better but I was happy to be in the new setting.Disagree with some of the above.
Agree with others.
But the one quoted, I strongly agree with. Esp. in regards to S01/02 of DSC. For me the show only really takes off in the third season.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.