• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

I'm just saying this was (technically) not a "put everything back the way it was before story.
Considering Spock's importance in galactic history later, I'd argue it was putting it all back to the way it was.

However, going by just up to that point in time, it still fits. Spock in the altered time died as a child, which is why we saw an Andorian XO when Kirk and Spock reappeared.
 
Considering Spock's importance in galactic history later, I'd argue it was putting it all back to the way it was.

However, going by just up to that point in time, it still fits. Spock in the altered time died as a child, which is why we saw an Andorian XO when Kirk and Spock reappeared.
All true. I'm just pointing out that at the end of the episode Kirk agreed with you that "everything had been put back." Spock did not agree.
 
TNG should've ended during season two with "Q Who", arguably the most tension-filled, threatening episode of TNG. The set-up for a shocking, yet believable series finale was all there, with Q--as seen in the episode-- forcing a premature introducing" the Borg to Starfleet long before any natural contact, and Starfleet's alleged finest being completely unprepared to even defend themselves against the species. The terror of the Borg 's attack in that episode would've served as both a superior judgement about arrogant humans (Picard conducted a masterclass in that early in the episode with his interactions with Q) more than that milquetoast pilot AKA "Encounter at Farpoint", and a bold way to end the arc of Starfleet/humanity.

...and before anyone complains, "B-but Star Trek is all about hope and optimism." need I remind said complainers that innumerable ST episodes ended tragically, with no hope or even a hint of a solution for characters, worlds, etc. IOW, Star Trek was never Sunshine and Lollipops in Space. The difference here is that one of the most believable set ups for an overwhelming threat fully pays off, and at the time the story is set, there's no research team to look to as a possible way out (not that mattered much when the Borg's canonical next visit occurred).
 
TNG should've ended during season two with "Q Who", arguably the most tension-filled, threatening episode of TNG. The set-up for a shocking, yet believable series finale was all there, with Q--as seen in the episode-- forcing a premature introducing" the Borg to Starfleet long before any natural contact, and Starfleet's alleged finest being completely unprepared to even defend themselves against the species. The terror of the Borg 's attack in that episode would've served as both a superior judgement about arrogant humans (Picard conducted a masterclass in that early in the episode with his interactions with Q) more than that milquetoast pilot AKA "Encounter at Farpoint", and a bold way to end the arc of Starfleet/humanity.

...and before anyone complains, "B-but Star Trek is all about hope and optimism." need I remind said complainers that innumerable ST episodes ended tragically, with no hope or even a hint of a solution for characters, worlds, etc. IOW, Star Trek was never Sunshine and Lollipops in Space. The difference here is that one of the most believable set ups for an overwhelming threat fully pays off, and at the time the story is set, there's no research team to look to as a possible way out (not that mattered much when the Borg's canonical next visit occurred).
Fascinating idea. The Federation builds this Uber ship class and immediately stumbles into the Borg...

Let's look at it from FASA's perspective.

Warp factor six equals 7776c, close enough to the original idea of warp factor six being one light-year per hour. And in essence the Galaxy blows up (pun intended).

Here's the real problem: the Honorverse. The weapons as described by David Weber, blow away Star Trek. It is quite clear that too many limitations were imposed on Star Trek...

I won't go into why here. But... leaving 'Q Who' as the very last episode? Brilliant.
 
I never felt that “I’ve always known I’ll die alone” was any sort of precognition, or meant to be. It was just a nagging, irrational fear/expectation, of a sort I think many of us have. Plus, it was obviously a setup for him not dying at the end of The Final Frontier, when he thinks the Bird of Prey is about to kill him, only for him to be beamed up and helped instead.

And intentionally or not, Generations seems to make a point of disproving it, in accordance with its own themes: At first, Kirk appears to have died alone, in the fiery blowout on the Enterprise-B (cf. “Time is the fire in which we burn”). But later, when he does die, it’s in Picard’s company, no longer alone (“Time is a friend that sees us through”).
I'd never thought about that before, about Generations. I just figured they ignored the line, but you're right, on further reflection.

Hell, A View to a Kill ends with a fistfight ON TOP OF THE GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE.
a good arguement for letting Moore continue to make movies past his prime. 70's View to a Kill would have been the same, but a Karate Chop fight. Somehow not as good.
Who is he supposed to be, Nostrildamus?
No, just a guy with the most racked up violations of whatever the time laws are. It would be a late stage Kirk thing to fly around trying to figure out how he'd die, but not understand the situation and get it wrong.
Eh, the show was on the ropes, Spock was the most popular character and they wanted people to tune in to the new season. Makes sense to start with an episode called ‘Spock’s Brain’.

It is most likely the most stupid title in all of TOS. I think @Tallguy is on to something with that. It’s been easy fodder for writers of other shows to write about characters who talk about Star Trek and ‘Spock’s Brain’ sounds funny for that kind of thing. I guess.
Yeah. Easy to forget now just how imporant TV Guide was to getting your show noticed and watched. At that time it was the most read magazine in the US.
Can i sneak in a question about The Wrath of Khan movie?-
When Chekov and another crewman beamed down to that hostile 'sandstorm' type planet and were captured by Khan and his followers and taken to their cargo container home, why did the two refuse to answer Khan's simple question about why they'd beamed down?
No wonder Khan was annoyed and put them wriggly things in their ears..:)
"Well evil guy I know about but my captain doesn't, we're doing a survey for an unbelieably top secret science program that can be perverted into a terrible weapon. But I can't tell you more than that."
Maybe they chalk it up to the mushrooms in space.

There are a lot of repeated similar hallucinations of people using Salvia Divonorum, of a female spirit, variously described as the Green Lady, Lady Salvia, etc. Of course the drug just may flip certain switches properly, and there's always the chance of being influenced by prior tales, but some of these were from people who didn't have contact with others before they tried it. I find that kind of thing interesting.
Not my opinion, but found online and copied here. I actually dig it.
This makes me think though.. considering how rapidly Alexander aged.. how do we know Worf isn't like 12 years old or something by Encounter at Farpoint?
I mean, he's way less genocidal and dangerous than the Female Founder or even Gul Dukat. But he's not a nice man.
In fairness, he seems to have had his plans shut down before he ever got that far, and adding on canon from ENT, that era of augments are all just incapable of working together long term, and prone to self-destruct. And the new audio drama doesn't do any favors for the myth of the "Superior intellect". If anything Malik might have been a better leader than Khan being more ruthless, but Soong coming back forced him to try and prove his leadership before he was ready.
By allowing Keeler to live, he would've changed the fate of trillions of beings across hundreds of years.
Or just spun off another reality where that was the case. Which depending on how one views these things, was a reality that always existed and that's simply the way things happened there.
Truthfully?

I hope he keeps doing that. Works perfectly for him.
When they asked him why he was on Star Trek he literally said, "I'm cheap." I was hoping for at least one Cronenberg monster on Discovery after he showed up. Oh well.
You know, I never followed why Spock needed a ship's computer (or a stone knives and bearskins version) to access the data on his tricorder. I don't think this was the case in any other episode.

I don't get it either. The tricorder had a small display. One could make the argument that maybe the display was damaged in transit, but he specifically mentions that on the ship he would have interfaced it as well. I just have to assume that for some reason the data stream on future events, etc, just had to be piped to external source. He'd been asking for a lot of expensive metals, so maybe his initial plan was to create some sort of IC solid state device, maybe even some kind of memory. Since Kirk couldn't get him anything but vacuum tubes he made a video converter and monitor instead.

his little monitor looks pretty modern for 1960's tech, too up to date for what he could have found in 1930. But he could have made a kind of oscilloscope based display, or done something like a Farnsworth TV:
NVM. My hypothesis makes zero sense. Rewatched. he was using the display from the tricorder.
philo_farnsworthtb.png
Might be because the speed that time and information was going while the Guardian was showing the stuff was too much to access easily and required more than the usual power to access it.

(Kind of like the Nintendo Switch: the Switch will hold saved data for any game, but some games require so much more memory to function that you can't access the game or the data without the added memory card.)
There should be a TOS style Time-contamination story where someone goes to a primitive world and drops an old handheld console game accidentally. Nintendo doesn't like it, but Square Enix will do a collab in a heartbeat. A planet whose development has been shaped by Japanese RPG's and their space-navy has gunblades.
big lotta quotes
indeed.
 
Last edited:
TNG should've ended during season two with "Q Who", arguably the most tension-filled, threatening episode of TNG.
Why not end with Measure of a Man? If you're hell bent on ending in the second year? For... Reasons?

My controversial Amiga opinion is that I'm glad that TNG's visual effects weren't ever rendered on Amigas, especially now that we can see those beautiful detailed physical models in HD. But I'm glad that Babylon 5's were.
You're talking five-ish years of advancement? (What were they rendering DS9 and Voyager on?) Just for history's sake I wish I still had the files for my Enterprise, D-7, X-wing, and Millennium Falcon. They probably took up less disk space than this web page. 🤣

Yeah. Easy to forget now just how imporant TV Guide was to getting your show noticed and watched. At that time it was the most read magazine in the US.
"Read the TV guide, you don't need a TV."

My hypothesis makes zero sense. Rewatched. he was using the display from the tricorder.
I think I might have thought something similar myself for a moment.

As far as any theory that the images are "compressed" or some other computer mumbo jumbo that would have been unknown in 1966-67, what possible gain of function could Spock be getting out of the 1930 circuits that he built vs. the computing power of an entire tricorder? I'm assuming that it's got more memory and better processing speed than a present day Galaxy Ultra or iPhone.

I genuinely would be curious (not that I would be faking my curiosity, of course) to know what Harlan and/or Dorothy was thinking was going on. It's an interesting enough McGuffin for the story that competes with the ticking clock AND pays off with good character moments for all three main characters. I just don't know what they thought was happening.

Obviously I adore D.C. Fontana, but she wrote the end of Tomorrow is Yesterday. She had a gift for compelling TV that made no sense at all when you gave it a moment's thought.
 
You're talking five-ish years of advancement? (What were they rendering DS9 and Voyager on?)
Oh no, now I need to know the answer to that!

It seems Amblin Imaging (and presumably their successor Digital Muse) and Foundation Imaging had switched from Amigas to using DEC Alpha systems with a render farm of Pentiums by 1995. Though Amblin made Voyager's CGI model on both Amiga and SGI workstations (with some textures getting lost when they moved it, which is why it has missing patches in the opening titles).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top