• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Starfleet Academy Nielsen Ratings

Writing aside, if they set the time period for DSC post-VOY post-Romulan destruction and not have Burnham related to Spock, 40% of the shows problems would vanish overnight.
Keep the spore-drive thing, link it up with future-Janeway's data being recovered, setting up the very early stages of the Temporal Wars.
I would prefer that, save the Temporal Wars which can burn in the special layer of hell.
 
Enterprise is referenced in Futurama, as is Janeway, so like... 🤷🏻‍♀️
Janeway and Voyager have been referenced multiple times on the Simpsons as well. Lenny in a Seven of Nine costume kills me.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I think you need a bit more clarification than that. Still I doubt that proves any kind of point.
You were questioning the cultural footprint shows like Voyager and Enterprise left behind. And she was telling you how they were referenced in one of the most critically respected and culturally influential adult animated cult comedies of all time. If that doesn’t prove to you that those shows became part of the cultural zeitgeist and our collective cultural lexicon then I don’t know what will. :shrug:
 
You were questioning the cultural footprint shows like Voyager and Enterprise left behind. And she was telling you how they were referenced in one of the most critically respected and culturally influential adult animated cult comedies of all time. If that doesn’t prove to you that those shows became part of the cultural zeitgeist and our collective cultural lexicon then I don’t know what will. :shrug:
Being referenced in a show that has been cancelled a few times? though so far in total it has run for 12 seasons through 3 networks.

She should have at least provided some evidence for the claim because I'm not sure I have pulled up everything. So enterprise gets referenced 13 years ago by showing a part of the hull and a nacelle in a junkyard, i'm not sure how that counters my claim, it actually strengthens it.

I also believe I am talking about how it's remembered today not 13+ years ago.
 
Kate Mulgrew "appeared" in Pixar's 2025 film "Elio" as the narrator of an exhibit on NASA's Voyager 1.
 
Being referenced in a show that has been cancelled a few times? though so far in total it has run for 12 seasons through 3 networks.

She should have at least provided some evidence for the claim because I'm not sure I have pulled up everything. So enterprise gets referenced 13 years ago by showing a part of the hull and a nacelle in a junkyard, i'm not sure how that counters my claim, it actually strengthens it.

I also believe I am talking about how it's remembered today not 13+ years ago.

Futurama keeps being brought back because its catalogue keeps proving to have value for whomever is holding at the time. That keeps all of its references present in much the same way the constant Simpsons reruns on television does.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2488.gif
    IMG_2488.gif
    987.4 KB · Views: 2
Being referenced in a show that has been cancelled a few times? though so far in total it has run for 12 seasons through 3 networks.

She should have at least provided some evidence for the claim because I'm not sure I have pulled up everything. So enterprise gets referenced 13 years ago by showing a part of the hull and a nacelle in a junkyard, i'm not sure how that counters my claim, it actually strengthens it.

I also believe I am talking about how it's remembered today not 13+ years ago.
Well, I think no-one is trying to claim that the general populace are somehow hardcore Enterprise fans fondly remembering details of specific episodes or whatever. But generally people know that it’s that 2000s Trek show with “Sam Beckett” as the captain and the hot Vulcan chick in a tight catsuit. Voyager definitely managed to leave a more significant footprint. It’s anecdotal, but when I wear my Star Trek: Voyager tee-shirt in public, I regularly get random people telling me how fondly they remember the show. Almost everyone can recall Janeway, Seven of Nine and the doctor. I’m sure it’s different in each country, but Voyager was massively popular here in Germany, especially when Seven joined the show.
 
Doesn't the "T" in PTSD stand for traumatic?
yes, and trauma refers to many different experiences...in the West we sometimes mistakenly only refer to it in the context of the military, but trauma can be many things: assault (sexual or otherwise), loss of a child, spouse, violence both physical and emotional.
 
Fretting or crowing about the ratings is above my pay grade. Either I enjoy a show or don’t. It’s not an indication of quality or value, just popularity.

If I was worried about popularity, I wouldn’t be a Star Trek fan. ;)
maybe so , but the end game here for Paramount etc...is profit, and profit is inexorably tied to popularity. If Paramount is not turning the (expected) profit they need from this series or any other, it won't last. That's not an aspersion, just the reality.
 
maybe so , but the end game here for Paramount etc...is profit, and profit is inexorably tied to popularity. If Paramount is not turning the (expected) profit they need from this series or any other, it won't last. That's not an aspersion, just the reality.
Unless any of us work for Paramount this is not our concern.
 
My endgame is being entertained. Even if it’s for just one or two seasons.
i get that,

without the numbers it will only be for one or two seasons, and most likely won't even make it to syndication where more millions await...."popularity" also equals longevity (e.g. The Simpsons and South Park)
 
Enterprise did age like milk and left no real cultural footprint. I mean, Voyager probably would be in close to the same boat if not for the doctor and 7. The show suffered from to many poorly written character
You'd be surprised in Voyager's case. There was that thing from Netflix a while back that showed that Voyager was dominating the top ten viewed Star Trek episodes (notably including Time and Again, which perhaps suggests more people started Voyager and stuck with it til its third episode than the other series).

Also, I don't know of I can prove this (maybe someone else can back me up) but I feel like Voyager does better with new/younger viewers than TNG or DS9 do; I'm guessing the new owners had some reason to believe this hence the oddly disproportionate focus on Voyager callbacks in their new shows aimed at child-to-teen audiences like PRO and SFA.

My niece liked it better than the other non-TOS shows FWIW, she found TNG extremely dull. I like TNG but if you watch it with someone who isn't already a fan and wasn't around when it was on, you do have to spend half the series saying "I promise it's not always this boring".
 
maybe so , but the end game here for Paramount etc...is profit, and profit is inexorably tied to popularity. If Paramount is not turning the (expected) profit they need from this series or any other, it won't last. That's not an aspersion, just the reality.

This is true, but the Neilson ratings are likely one of many metrics they are likely looking at. Other factors are also how is the show doing on its own platform as well as affiliate platforms like Prime where is has been in the top ten frequently. Is it driving subscriptions? Also, what is the social media impacts.

That being said, there is a lot going on beyond just ratings. There is Paramount/CBS attempt to purchase Warner Brothers which has them attempting to curry favor with Trump's administration. There is also the reality the Kurtzman's deal is up at the end of the year and no word yet on renewal. There are many factors at play in terms of whether the show gets a third season.

One advantage in Academy's favour, however, is that if the show is cancelled after season 2, that would mean no live action Trek shows would be in active production which given recent affirmations that Trek remains a priority, I question if that would happen.

I'm cautiously optimistic we'll probably get a third season. This is from someone who went into Academy expecting to loath it and I'm enjoying it. Is it the best Trek ever, no, but ironically for me it's the first Trek of the modern era that seems to be focusing more on the optimism in Trek rather than going darker.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top