"Mid-80s overload" definitely did not help. Even the doors have a recurring triangular theme that definitely are of their time. While 60s and 70s Who had various aspects of the decades in which they were made*, the 80s upped the ante to varying extents and, as JNT the producer loved modernizing the show so it wouldn't look dated**, he did go even farther. Season 24 manages to be far worse with set and costume designs as well, so I'm just glad this got made during season 23 and it's the one story that made me glad for the hiatus as this is easily the best story of the four, with "Mindwarp" succeeding more for its direction and buildup of threat/suspense of a story (even though it was too soon to have Peri hype up the Doctor being good with season 22 remaining on the minds of some viewers and only 4 episodes that showed a more refined Doctor... "Vervoids" definitely gets Six down perfect, even if I missed some of the more acerbic and potentially caustic nature of his character.)
* such as groovy hairdos, groovy costumes (but the show being in black and white only showed groovy patterns without groovy colors), 70s sport jackets made from recycled sofa fabric with beige yet gauche tartan patterns that would have inspired the 6th Doctor's coat to be the antimatter universe's equivalent of... the coat grew on me, though. It's iconic, but ironic that it looked better on McCoy! (Color theory class/color wheel prevailing, of course.)
** the irony is, extensive overload of then-topical patterns and looks made it date far faster than what preceded it and not even the 80sest of the 80s went to such goofy extremes. Sheesh, even that Atari 7800 commercial with kids dressed up to look like full grown adults twice their age wasn't as tacky...
Overlook the Vervoids' design being the most unintentionally camp***, and thankfully they're sparingly used for the most part, and there's enough of the surrounding plot and characters to make it work. I think the Vervoid design was meant to show a flower bud but it, um, doesn't quite, eh, work as intended... nor does it help when you get the then-latest issue of DWM sporting said head in 35mm detail quality on glossy, glorious A4-sized cover and then people stare and wonder what the hell the magazine is for if it's got a dirty picture in plain view with no blue cellophane hiding the good parts, zoiks!!! (Actually, rude or otherwise, the costume does manage to look more expensive than it should. Yet it looks like any number of things you'd sit through during Biology class during Anatomical Design week...) I'm just glad they didn't do fourth wall breaks back then.
*** Which is preferable to intentional campiness, unless it involves characters such as Mrs Slocombe, Captain Peakcock, Mr Humphires and in the distinct genre of comedy (subcategory: farce). YMMV, but sci-fi taking itself seriously makes it better, especially for parody. Sci-fi shows that integrate self-parody consciously just come off as bizarre, with making actual parody of them far easier to do, like this:
Unless it's sci-fi parody like "Red Dwarf", which somehow nails every aspect across the board. Same with "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy", but the Dwarfers are more fun.





You're in for a treat then!
Yeah, both the original and special cuts are on the same disc and it's buried in one of the menus requiring an extra keypad press. :\