• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Abiogenesis and life on Earth - thoughts and pet theories?

Where and how did life on Earth first arise?

  • Warm little pond, membrane first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Warm little pond, heredity (RNA/DNA/clay/?) first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tidal pool, metabolism first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tidal pool, heredity (RNA/DNA/clay/?) first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alkaline vent, membrane first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alkaline vent, heredity (RNA/DNA/clay/?) first

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Black smoker, heredity (RNA/DNA/clay/?) first

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    19
This article just showed up on my Google front page:
The Math Says Life Shouldn’t Exist: New Study Challenges Origins Theories
https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-challenges-origins-theories/
The findings indicate that chance alone, combined with natural chemical reactions, may not sufficiently account for the origin of life within the limited timeframe of early Earth.
I would think that if the barriers to the spontaneous formation of life was extremely high, chance might be the only reason it has formed so early. Roll a million sided die and you might hit your number on the first throw, as unlikely as that is, it is still possible.

Because systems generally move toward disorder rather than order, the formation of the highly structured arrangements required for life faces serious barriers.
Except, there are forces and structures that do move systems towards order. Gravity is one, velcro is another.

While maintaining scientific rigor, the paper acknowledges that directed panspermia, originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel, remains a speculative but logically open alternative.
This just adds another turtle to the tower. The question of the likelihood of life forming naturally doesn't change. In fact, that would only make chance a much more important player in the game.

If life on Earth was the result of alien seeding, doesn't that put the true origins of life much closer to the creation of the universe than if it formed naturally here on Earth? Life still had to have formed spontaneously somewhere, and to obscure the the question of its possibility and likelihood with an earlier intermediary, just means it would have had to form, develop, and evolve to intelligent life that then advanced technologically to interstellar travel hundreds of millions of years earlier. That really is our number coming up on the first roll in a million.

This hypothesis suggests that life might have been intentionally seeded on Earth by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations, though the author notes this idea challenges Occam’s razor, the scientific principle favoring simpler explanations.

-Will
 
The video linked below presents a convincing (to me, a non-expert) hypothesis for how phosphorus weathering during the breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent reshaped Earth’s biosphere by fueling oxygen production, replacing the largely sulfidic Canfield ocean with a purely oxic one, thereby enabling the creation of a eukaryotic food web. Eukaryotes first filter fed on eukaryotic algae as a source of sterols, rather than bacterial mats, and then some evolved the locomotory and sensory apparatus to actively predate each other, causing the evolution of hard parts needed for protection.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

What isn't mentioned is that the evolution of sex meant that an additional food source could have been all the spare sperm and eggs floating around available to be gobbled up like a caviar banquet. All sorts of weird cross-fertilisation could also have taken place. Most resulting embryos wouldn't have been viable but some might have gotten lucky with hybrid vigour. This might explain why so many eukaryotes undergo metamorphic phases between larval and adult forms, such as is seen in tunicates, echinoderms, arthropods, and to a lesser extent even in vertebrates such as ourselves (puberty).
 
This might explain why so many eukaryotes undergo metamorphic phases between larval and adult forms, such as is seen in tunicates, echinoderms, arthropods, and to a lesser extent even in vertebrates such as ourselves (puberty).
Sounds a bit like the old discredited phylogenetic recapitulation theory, the one that had three members of Scott's final antarctic mission scouring around in antarctic winter trying to get penguin embryos to prove.
 
The more we study life up close, the more we learn about how difficult abiogenesis is. But yet, it had to have happened, either here on earth or somewhere else and transported here. The only other explanation is the supernatural BS, and I won't accept that. We just need to find the precursor life that happened to make RNA one day, and then we'll have it.

And whatever that was, we'll need to find out where it came from. :lol:
 
Sounds a bit like the old discredited phylogenetic recapitulation theory, the one that had three members of Scott's final antarctic mission scouring around in antarctic winter trying to get penguin embryos to prove.
Except I'm not referring to embryonic development. I'm referring to the later transition where a much different body plan is expressed, almost as if a completely different set of control genes (from a different ancestor) takes over the Hox genes and starts again. In vertebrates this seems much more muted.

Perhaps, 550 Ma ago, motile larvae with notochords of adult creatures similar to a sessile tunicate neotenically mutated to become sexually active and became the ancestors of all chordates.

Having lost the genes to enter fully the adult stage, only the ones enabling sexual maturity survived and we inherited these. I, for one, am glad. Being a immotile sea-squirt whose main role is to produce gametes sounds very boring, although I guess without a brain, one wouldn't notice.

Even now, perhaps some people subconsciously strive to enter the lost, true adult stage - sounds very messy. /joking

ETA: The following video discusses Hox genes.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top