There are days where Whovians make Trekkies seem positive and upbeat,
I am.Doesn't seem like the time to be optimistic about either franchise.
Thread bump.
My 'hot take' is this: there were actually a number of good ideas in the "Leekley Bible" that could've made for a solid US remake of the series. The Doctor and The Master being half-brothers, The Master taking over Gallifrey, the spirit of Barusa existing in the TARDIS, and The Doctor looking for his father all work and are simple enough concepts for audiences to grasp, and if you throw in the character of Lizzie Travis (whom Leekley created for the series' Pilot) as a permanent Companion, you're 'golden' as far as giving audiences a surrogate to ask any questions that might not be clear.
I didn’t even mind the ‘Cybs’ concept to an extent.
Thread bump.
My 'hot take' is this: there were actually a number of good ideas in the "Leekley Bible" that could've made for a solid US remake of the series. The Doctor and The Master being half-brothers, The Master taking over Gallifrey, the spirit of Barusa existing in the TARDIS, and The Doctor looking for his father all work and are simple enough concepts for audiences to grasp, and if you throw in the character of Lizzie Travis (whom Leekley created for the series' Pilot) as a permanent Companion, you're 'golden' as far as giving audiences a surrogate to ask any questions that might not be clear.
The only one of these that I don't really like is the ghost of Borusa haunting the TARDIS. All the rest would have been just fine with me for an American reboot.
An entire series of Star Trek can come and go disappointing millions, in the time it takes to turn the page between two seasons of Doctor Who, annoying thousands.There are days where Whovians make Trekkies seem positive and upbeat,
That reimagining and the reimagining of the Daleks are also really workable ideas (IMO).
Barusa's spirit existing inside the TARDIS essentially gives The Doctor two Companions, which is why I think it works.
Barusa's presence also serves as an easy way to give The Doctor's quest some direction.
"Barusa" is actually how it's (mis)spelt in the Leekley bible.Borusa. Borusa.
As already explained, I'm spelling the character's name correctly based on the source material I'm talking about.Borusa. Borusa.
"Barusa" is actually how it's (mis)spelt in the Leekley bible.
I'd correct Mr. Leekley too.
When something's intentionally misspelled, you're not 'correcting' anything; you're just being Pedantic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.