• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Observations on Janice Lester's isolation room

I do like that, but unfortunately MM also went out of its way to make the Marlena room even larger by including a table and chair, right where your wall goes! :mad:
wz4OEIk.png

Yeah that room is pretty large. I did notice that on that the production crew removed the blinky panel from the pain booth corridor and replaced it with a flat blue panel when redressed for the corridor next to Kirk's quarters. That is a nice touch.

The second season especially seemed especially obsessed with that new side corridor as it turned up a lot! Were the existing side corridors really not enough?
Still, it mostly worked and added more visual interest to certain scenes.
Less so for its appearances in Season Three because the Briefing Room carpet now extended further and every time that little side corridor turned up it now had a BLUE floor!!!

Oh damn. Now I'm going to start looking for the blue floor ;)
 
Oh damn. Now I'm going to start looking for the blue floor ;)
The blue floor expansion started in late S2, although I don't think it ever intruded into the corridor setup!
The side corridor got a bit more simplified as time went on. Here's the corridor in JTB, without the coloured floor stripe from MM:
And here's the blue floor outside Kirk's side-door in BAYN
And in S3, the blue corridor has arrived! :D
 
How many of the walls were wild or removable? All of them?
The research I've been doing for my set model project has made me realize a lot more of them were wild than are indicated on the set plans. I've come to believe that some were "easily/intentionally" wild while others were "wild if you really need it," maybe distinguished by the difficulty of the redress.
 
I understand that set walls are usually much flimsier than they appear, that the only sturdy part is the underlying framework that they're placed on. And movie sets are often quite flimsy since they're only meant to be used for a few days or weeks and then efficiently torn down. The only reason the Star Trek sets endured through the movies, TNG, and Voyager is that they were originally built for the Phase II series and thus were made sturdier than feature film sets. But even so, it was mostly just the frameworks that were preserved while the visible walls and interiors were replaced (though they did keep the same corridor walls throughout, mostly).

So it's probably not hard to take down a wall panel if you want to put a camera behind it, or to open up a new corridor space between rooms, as long as the underlying shape of the set framework is unaltered. Though of course that wasn't the case for the bridge, where the walls were covered in equipment and consoles, so that the whole segments had to be built wild.
 
IIRC, at least some of the bridge stations were built so that the top section could be removed, allowing the set to be shot into without pulling an entire pie wedge out. You can see something like this in the second pilot, but I can't be sure that's the actual bridge station in the lower part of the frame or just something stuck there to hide the fact that a wedge was pulled out.
where-no-man-has-gone-before-br-162.jpg

I forget if this feature was the case when the set was moved from Desilu Culver to the Gower facility and revised for series production.
 
Last edited:
IIRC, at least some of the bridge stations were built so that the top section could be removed, allowing the set to be shot into without pulling an entire pie wedge out. You can see something like this in the second pilot, but I can't be sure that's the actual bridge station in the lower part of the frame or just something stuck there to hide the fact that a wedge was pulled out.
where-no-man-has-gone-before-br-162.jpg

I forget if this feature was the case when the set was moved from Desilu Culver to the Gower facility and revised for series production.
I think it's a one time, ad hoc thing they put there to look like a section of railing. And possibly it was there to conceal a pyrotechnic device that would explode during their attempt to enter the galactic barrier. The actual railing wouldn't hide the device.

I also think this overhang....

...was a one-off that was placed there to block our view of the overhead lamps. It's way too low to be the actual bridge alcove ceiling.
 
I understand that set walls are usually much flimsier than they appear, that the only sturdy part is the underlying framework that they're placed on.
Yup, I suspect they used thin grades of plywood and sheetrock. In a reaction shot after Charlie Evans throws Kirk and Spock down in Janice's quarters, if you don't blink you can see where Nimoy's backside has busted the drywall.
 
IIRC, at least some of the bridge stations were built so that the top section could be removed, allowing the set to be shot into without pulling an entire pie wedge out. You can see something like this in the second pilot, but I can't be sure that's the actual bridge station in the lower part of the frame or just something stuck there to hide the fact that a wedge was pulled out.
where-no-man-has-gone-before-br-162.jpg

I forget if this feature was the case when the set was moved from Desilu Culver to the Gower facility and revised for series production.
Here's an image that's a BTS from The Cage that also shows that 'half station' (center column of images)


WACwQvm.jpg
 
In (I believe) "The Making of Star Trek" is says that each perimeter bridge station could be separated into 3 sections. The modification was made after the move from Culver City to Desilu.
 
Is there a larger version of that somewhere?
Probably but I don't have a copy.
Just something I found a long time ago that I have stored on one of my portable hard drives—and I think the file date showed I put it on the drive in 2009. I posted it (and another one here) back in 2022 when the 'Is the bridge at a funny angle?' thread touched on the subject of the bridge construction and that half-wall/console. I think there is a third similar image stashed away on there but I'd have to dig out that old drive to see.
 
Is there a larger version of that somewhere?

Probably but I don't have a copy.
Just something I found a long time ago that I have stored on one of my portable hard drives—and I think the file date showed I put it on the drive in 2009. I posted it (and another one here) back in 2022 when the 'Is the bridge at a funny angle?' thread touched on the subject of the bridge construction and that half-wall/console. I think there is a third similar image stashed away on there but I'd have to dig out that old drive to see.
They like one of a series of contact proofs, some of which were sold at the Greg Jein auction two years ago.

https://entertainment.ha.com/itm/mo...7278-89104.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top