I was meaning more like background characters who weren't part of the regular cast. More chances Mignogna would have cast seasoned actors for those one-shots...
Revisiting Star Trek Continues...
- Thread starter Warped9
- Start date
I was glad to see Mbenga’s reappearance. I would like to have seen Kyle again. I was glad to see a regular Security Chief, but I might have been inclined to bring back Lt. Cmdr. Giotto from “The Devil In The Dark” rather than introducing the new character of Drake. As I mentioned before McKenna should simply have been the new ship’s psychiatrist rather than counsellor. She could even been Helen Noel, or maybe Noel transferred out after messing with Kirk’s head in “Dagger Of The Mind.”
When I look at it overall it seems they were reinterpreting the characters and their relationships some. As mentioned upthread the Spock/McCoy banter was missing. Smith seemed to be getting more attention than Uhura. McKenna was being utilized in place of McCoy.
And instead of just doing episodic stories they were deliberately trying to set the stage for TMP, most blatantly in the last two episodes. And that is something TOS would never have done simply because there is no way whatsoever they could have foreshadowed what was to happen in the years to come.
When I look at it overall it seems they were reinterpreting the characters and their relationships some. As mentioned upthread the Spock/McCoy banter was missing. Smith seemed to be getting more attention than Uhura. McKenna was being utilized in place of McCoy.
And instead of just doing episodic stories they were deliberately trying to set the stage for TMP, most blatantly in the last two episodes. And that is something TOS would never have done simply because there is no way whatsoever they could have foreshadowed what was to happen in the years to come.
IIRC, Kim Stinger AKA NuUhura left STNV to join with Mignogna for the chance of more screen exposure on STC than she was getting. As evidenced in their first episode she did get more scenes, but almost right away her face time dwindled down drastically. I believe only 2 episodes afterward gave her more spotlight.
Sulu apart from Fairest Of Them All didn't really have that much to do at all...
The character that surprised me most of all was Boba Fett Jr who had a great introduction in Lolani, with his expertise on Tellarite ships, then poof-ed away in a cloud of smoke...
Last edited:
Too fan-service-y. Riley of all characters did not need to return; he was so traumatized in his final TOS appearance, that one would assume he transferred off of the Enterprise after the Kodos affair to settle his life.
I assumed as much. It would have been a very uncomfortable working experience after the events of the episode in question.
If there's one glaring problem with STC its continuing the fan film misinterpretation of McCoy as a constant grouch / "hater". McCoy challenged people or situations, but he was very compassionate, friendly and insightful, yet those traits were generally removed to sell the "damn it, Jim!" stereotype seen in too many parodies (and from anti-McCoy individuals on social media platforms).
Last edited:
"Too" fan-servicey?! almost every fan filmmaking group are using the Mirror Mirror concepts & costumes, if that isn't fan service, I don't know what is...
Many of the main Trek characters were "traumatized" in all 3 seasons to a greater degree than Riley. I don't understand why some people apply the rules from serialized television to a show that was entirely episodic...
There is a sense in TOS that not every crewman or officer we saw was aboard for the long haul of the full five years. Of course, some don’t make it because they came to an untimely end, but others evidently transferred off before the five years ended or onto the ship sometime after the ship had already embarked upon the five year voyage.
Case in point is McKennah. She is obviously assigned to the ship late in the game, and she references Lt. Carolyn Palamas having left the ship sometime after the events depicted in “Who Mourns For Adonais?”
Bringing a favoured character back isn’t necessarily fan-service-y unless theres a good reason not to bring them back. We can just assume we had no reason to see them in the interim just as we can assume Chekov was already aboard in Season 1 only we didn’t see him until he started getting regular duty on the bridge in Season 2.
Some characters like Janice Rand might be trickier. Rand was a fan favourite who was brought back as a transporter specialist or Chief in TMP (maybe she wanted to be sure no one was ever duplicated ever again). We can assume she left the Enterprise sometime during the first year and returned when the ship was being refit. Or we can assume she remained aboard, but simply transferred to a different department where she was no longer Kirk’s personal yeoman and so we never saw her again. And since we never again saw anyone else assigned as Kirk’s personal yeoman we might assume Kirk doesn’t want or really need one or the position isn’t really necessary.
Besides injecting references and callouts to later productions what I consider really fan-service-y is creating situations fans like that likely never would have happened in the original production. Reinterpreting the characters is one way fans make the established characters do want they want them to do even if it’s highly unlikely the original production would ever have done that. Introducing characters that partially supplant or minimize the established characters or writing stories like “The White Iris” is very fan-service-y.
Kirk being duplicated was done twice in TOS: “The Enemy Within” and “Mirror, Mirror.” Actually four times if you include “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” and “Whom Gods Destroy.” If you include TAS’ “The Survivor” (and STC doesn’t seem to acknowledge TAS as canon) then it’s five times we see a duplicate Kirk. Kirk has been aged abnormally in “The Deadly Years” and again if you include TAS’ “The Lorelei Signal.”
So oh-how-original and fan-service-y for STC to give us yet another duplicate Kirk only this time he’s been aged in their episode “Still Treads The Shadow” (which I haven’t revisited yet). And they bring the Defiant back from “The Tholian Web.” Seriously this was pretty much a retelling of TNG’s “Second Chances” only set in the TOS era.
For me this is a lot more fan-service-y than bringing back a character we haven’t seen since TOS’ first or second season.
Case in point is McKennah. She is obviously assigned to the ship late in the game, and she references Lt. Carolyn Palamas having left the ship sometime after the events depicted in “Who Mourns For Adonais?”
Bringing a favoured character back isn’t necessarily fan-service-y unless theres a good reason not to bring them back. We can just assume we had no reason to see them in the interim just as we can assume Chekov was already aboard in Season 1 only we didn’t see him until he started getting regular duty on the bridge in Season 2.
Some characters like Janice Rand might be trickier. Rand was a fan favourite who was brought back as a transporter specialist or Chief in TMP (maybe she wanted to be sure no one was ever duplicated ever again). We can assume she left the Enterprise sometime during the first year and returned when the ship was being refit. Or we can assume she remained aboard, but simply transferred to a different department where she was no longer Kirk’s personal yeoman and so we never saw her again. And since we never again saw anyone else assigned as Kirk’s personal yeoman we might assume Kirk doesn’t want or really need one or the position isn’t really necessary.
Besides injecting references and callouts to later productions what I consider really fan-service-y is creating situations fans like that likely never would have happened in the original production. Reinterpreting the characters is one way fans make the established characters do want they want them to do even if it’s highly unlikely the original production would ever have done that. Introducing characters that partially supplant or minimize the established characters or writing stories like “The White Iris” is very fan-service-y.
Kirk being duplicated was done twice in TOS: “The Enemy Within” and “Mirror, Mirror.” Actually four times if you include “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” and “Whom Gods Destroy.” If you include TAS’ “The Survivor” (and STC doesn’t seem to acknowledge TAS as canon) then it’s five times we see a duplicate Kirk. Kirk has been aged abnormally in “The Deadly Years” and again if you include TAS’ “The Lorelei Signal.”
So oh-how-original and fan-service-y for STC to give us yet another duplicate Kirk only this time he’s been aged in their episode “Still Treads The Shadow” (which I haven’t revisited yet). And they bring the Defiant back from “The Tholian Web.” Seriously this was pretty much a retelling of TNG’s “Second Chances” only set in the TOS era.
For me this is a lot more fan-service-y than bringing back a character we haven’t seen since TOS’ first or second season.
Last edited:
At least "Mirror, Mirror" left something--Spock considering changing the empire--that was an interesting "what could be" for another story. Kevin Riley is not. He was initially comic relief in one episode, then tied to Kirk's backstory in another, but he did not offer much more than that. In fact. Sulu (a recurring character) could have been the other 1701 crew member who survived Kodos' massacre. At least he would have been established as a fixture on the ship (and perhaps build on his being a survivor since he would be around) more than the originally one-and-done Riley...until he was written into TCOTK.
A point i've always accepted about TOS; characters seen a couple of times such as Farrell or Riley, or those with more appearances such as Rand (in her case i'm strictly talking about the character, not the BTS abuses suffered by Whitney) appear to be those who--in universe--transferred from the 1701. It happens.
If ever a missed opportunity to bring a character back on TOS or add her to STC existed, it was in the form of Lt. Charlene Masters from "The Altenative Factor", who--in just a single episode--displayed far more potential and range than many of the occasional recurring characters such as Rand or Riley.
In Riley's case, I cannot see a good reason to bring him back.
A failing of STC. Pound for pound, TAS quite obviously plays like a 4th and 5th season of TOS more than any fan film, including the strong STC.
The fatal flaw in your argument is that the only reason Kevin Riley offered either of those two, independent things is because he was written that way. Ergo, he could just as easily been written to offer a third something in the service of the plot and story, and fleshed out if necessary. It could have been anything.
In many ways, the secondary characters were fungible (see for example how Janice Rand was rewritten to be Helen Noel; rewrite a few lines and "Dagger of the Mind" works just as well* with Janice in place of Helen).
* - Admittedly, maybe it could have worked even better with Janice instead of Helen, since Janice wouldn't necessarily share Helen's psychiatric training, which could have provided at least a nominally better excuse for mixing personal elements into the experiment with the neural neutralizer on Kirk.
Riley's second appearance was originally to be a different character, but when the same actor was cast, they just changed it to Riley.
