In my head canon, only the first movie exists. They're just immortal, deal with it.
We don't know if he's actually playing Ramirez, all we know is he's playing the mentor to Henry Cavill's character, who might or might not be Connor. They seem to be avoiding using the characters' names in the announcements, so there's at least a decent chance these could all be new characters.![]()
Russell Crowe Joins Henry Cavill in ‘Highlander’
Oscar-winner Russell Crowe will play Henry Cavill's mentor in the remake of "Highlander."variety.com
For Christ's sake!
They couldn't find a Spanish actor?
Good point. We dunno exactly who they are playing, but if they are playing the same characters then meh..We don't know if he's actually playing Ramirez, all we know is he's playing the mentor to Henry Cavill's character, who might or might not be Connor. They seem to be avoiding using the characters' names in the announcements, so there's at least a decent chance these could all be new characters.
Do we even know for sure yet if this is a remake or a new original story set in the Highlander universe?
yesWasn't that retconned or am I misremembering?
Wasn't that retconned or am I misremembering?
Yeah, but what wasn't?
Highlander 3 was always just a sequel to the original and ignored 2, and at least attempts to justify the reason more immortals are alive.Yeah, but what wasn't?
Highlander is (arguably) basically just a long series of retcons.
In Highlander II, the immortals turn out to be aliens from Zeist.
In Highlander the Series, the Game was never actually won. Not even close. There are now almost as many immortals kicking about as there are episodes in a sex-season television show.
In Highlander III, the Game was never won because there were three more Immortals stuck in a cave. Highlander III also (of course) retcons the Zeist reveal. Their origins are now 'shrouded in mystery'.
In Highlander Endgame, the Game was never won. There are quite a few immortals still kicking about, and they're mostly played by TV-caliber actors.
In Highlander: The Source...oof. Don't make me remember it.
And the cartoon. Pass.
Yeah...a retcon.Highlander 3 was always just a sequel to the original and ignored 2
Even the first movie is a bit dicey with immortality "rules". Immortals can be killed and they come back to life...but for some reason Connor does not drown when he's at the bottom of the lake. Somehow he's fine underwater for extended periods, and this amazing ability is never referenced again.I can't remember but what did they eat when in the cave, surely if you didn't immortal or not you'd be emaciated.
That my friend is the quickeningI dunno, the original film is just a lightening in a bottle film
Maybe that's why Henry Morgan always woke up in water after he died.Yeah...a retcon.
Even the first movie is a bit dicey with immortality "rules". Immortals can be killed and they come back to life...but for some reason Connor does not drown when he's at the bottom of the lake. Somehow he's fine underwater for extended periods, and this amazing ability is never referenced again.![]()
It's hardly worse than getting Sean Connery to play an Egyptian man who pretended he was Spanish.Oh no...
I thought the irony of Highlander 1 was interesting... the immortals fight. The losers die. And the winner... also dies. So technically, either they all win, or they all lose.
Maybe. The way Connor describes the Prize, he might be saying that he can grow old and die rather than he has to. But he also can now have children, and with effort he can hear the thoughts of everyone on Earth.I thought the irony of Highlander 1 was interesting... the immortals fight. The losers die. And the winner... also dies. So technically, either they all win, or they all lose.
The temptation is to say I'd rather die by the sword because you'd still get so many more years than a normal person. But that's not a guarantee, because we've seen brand new immortals killed too.Which would rather die from - being decapitated by a sword, or old age (natural causes).
I thought the irony of Highlander 1 was interesting... the immortals fight. The losers die. And the winner... also dies. So technically, either they all win, or they all lose.
And that's long been a staple of our storytelling, the notion that earthly immortality is actually undesirable. It goes all the way back to "The Odyssey", when Ulysses turns down immortal life on Calypso's isle to return to his family in Ithaca.They have to see everyone they love die. Can't have children. The Prize was being able to have a live like normal people.
The theory is that "The Prize" basically gives the winner whatever their hearts desire is. For Connor SPECIFICALLY it was being able to have children and grow old and die.I thought the irony of Highlander 1 was interesting... the immortals fight. The losers die. And the winner... also dies. So technically, either they all win, or they all lose.
Well apparently they could be what they wanted, I reckon the Kurgan won and he's now POTUSYeah can't really see the Kurgan being thrilled with wanting to grow old and pop out kids.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.