There was a TV Spider-Man?
That's news to me.
The Amazing Spider-Man ran on CBS from 1977-79, and had--according to the book
Age of TV Heroes (TwoMorrows Publishing, 2010) strong ratings (among a younger demographic), but then-CBS president William Paley did not renew the series thanks to his thin skin over a joke that CBS was no longer the "Tiffany Network", but the "Comic Book Network" (in addition to
The Amazing Spider-Man,
Wonder Woman,
The Incredible Hulk and re-runs of
Shazam and
The Secrets of Isis were on the schedule).
The TV Peter Parker was a college student and had more in common (where personality was concerned) with
The Amazing Spider-Man daily comic strip (launched in 1977--the same debut year of the TV series' premiere) than the monthly titles, which worked as the comic strip Parker was arguably more settled in his skin and relationships.
Once upon a time I was excited by the notion that we'd work to Crisis On Infinite Earths. But that was before everybody and their brother started doing "multiverse". It's DC's biggest story and aside from The Great Darkness Saga from the Legion of Super-Heroes, I can't think of any really "big" stories from DC that have really stood the test of time like those two.
Agreed;
Crisis on Infinite Earths was one of the less than a handful of event superhero comic arcs / events that was necessary and a creative masterclass. COIE has never been adapted on any level matching the vision and impact of the maxi-series, and its doubtful it will ever happen.
I can't think of any really "big" stories from DC that have really stood the test of time like those two.
Probably due to other "event" comics trying in vain to match or outperform COIE in one way or another; when being the "next big epic" is the driving motive behind a story, it tends to be a bloated mess, and i'm fairly certain that's coming in some superhero adaptations.
one thing that I really love is that Superman finally talks and acts like a real person, not the goody two shoes of the Reeve movie. He's more "Superman 1938" than "Superman 1978" and that's a welcome change to me.
Indeed. I would be pleasantly surprised if the Gunn Superman leaned (to any degree) in the direction of his foundational comic book version, which was as far removed from the goody two-shoes you referred to as a character can get.