There's a recent thread on divisions, with discussion of colors, here: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/divisions-starfleet-should-have.318564/question is, what colors for what departments?
See the end for one of my proposals.

There's a recent thread on divisions, with discussion of colors, here: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/divisions-starfleet-should-have.318564/question is, what colors for what departments?
Garrett owned up to it and said he fixed his tardiness issue.
So no second chances for people apparently.
"Forgive and forget" doesn't mean that Wang was right to direct episodes. Just because you are an actor, even a good actor, does not make you right to direct. I think Berman learned that lesson with Gates McFadden back on TNG.So you won't "forgive or forget", but Berman should have?
I'm part of the outside fandom.So you won't "forgive or forget", but Berman should have?
The problems with "Genesis" began with its script. We can blame Braga for that. No one could have polished that turd!"Forgive and forget" doesn't mean that Wang was right to direct episodes. Just because you are an actor, even a good actor, does not make you right to direct. I think Berman learned that lesson with Gates McFadden back on TNG.
Probably true. Though I have always found aspects of "Genesis" to be interesting. I'm probably in the minority on that.The problems with "Genesis" began with its script. We can blame Braga for that. No one could have polished that turd!
I'm part of the outside fandom.
I don't work for Berman.
I'm also quite negative on actors directing in general. Jonathan Frakes has turned out to be an awesome director, IMHO, but as a general rule I think it's a bad idea for actors to get pretty much any level of creative control over the properties they are acting in.
Roxann Dawson has done fantastic work as a director.Probably true. Though I have always found aspects of "Genesis" to be interesting. I'm probably in the minority on that.
I'm also quite negative on actors directing in general. Jonathan Frakes has turned out to be an awesome director, IMHO, but as a general rule I think it's a bad idea for actors to get pretty much any level of creative control over the properties they are acting in. I even include Leonard Nimoy in that. Not a huge fan of him as a Trek director, though I think he did better on non-Trek projects like "Three Men and a Baby."
he also states several times his belief that women are either beautiful or good actresses, but rarely both.
First off, yes. He clearly says what I said. He said that actresses who are beautiful and talented actresses both are a rarity. I mean, he literally says those words. He doesn't say they don't exist, but he says it is a rare combination.No.
What he observes - and it's well-taken, IMO - is that actresses who were both were in such demand that it was difficult to sign one to a syndicated series.
Star Trek or not, first-run syndication was considered lesser exposure than network and the pay rates for everyone involved - actors, writers, etc. - were lower. If I'm not misremembering, residual rates were also less generous. So if you were given a budget to cast a series, and you were spending a good chunk of it on folks like Brooks and Auberjenois, the challenges of getting everything you wanted when casting supporting parts were greater.
No.
What he observes - and it's well-taken, IMO - is that actresses who were both were in such demand that it was difficult to sign one to a syndicated series.
Star Trek or not, first-run syndication was considered lesser exposure than network and the pay rates for everyone involved - actors, writers, etc. - were lower. If I'm not misremembering, residual rates were also less generous. So if you were given a budget to cast a series, and you were spending a good chunk of it on folks like Brooks and Auberjenois, the challenges of getting everything you wanted when casting supporting parts were greater.
I agree. I've watched Berman's entire 3+ hour interview and, quite frankly, he just doesn't come across as having much respect for the women in his employ. However, as you say, I don't know the man personally nor have I ever worked for him, so I could be wrong.I understand where you're coming from. Though Berman comes across as pretty slimy there, just the vibes. I don't know him, he could be a great person in real life. He just doesn't come across well there.
Plus, this should put to rest that Behr had big plans for the character. He knew, probably midway through season six, they were losing Farrell.
You and me both, but it is what it is. I can head canon the why of when it wasn't command gold.All the NX jumpsuits were blue, but command had a yellow stripe. I preferred when that yellow stripe was part of an unbroken lineage through to command yellow in TOS.
Still not healthy to be THIS angry about it.I'm part of the outside fandom.
I don't work for Berman.
You and me both, but it is what it is. I can head canon the why of when it wasn't command gold.
Looking at episode ratings, it seems like Star Trek actors often did a great job as directors.I'm also quite negative on actors directing in general. Jonathan Frakes has turned out to be an awesome director, IMHO, but as a general rule I think it's a bad idea for actors to get pretty much any level of creative control over the properties they are acting in. I even include Leonard Nimoy in that. Not a huge fan of him as a Trek director, though I think he did better on non-Trek projects like "Three Men and a Baby."
Oh, I definitely believe that was the reasoning for the TNG Era colors. The poster was talking about the period from ENT to TOS.Starfleet wanted to go back to the more simplified division colors, after the Monster Maroons, but decided red was the better color for command officers.
Oh, I definitely believe that was the reasoning for the TNG Era colors. The poster was talking about the period from ENT to TOS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.