You completely missed the point. I am very aware of what it was used for in TOS.United Space Ship. It was used in TOS,
Furthermore you missed the emoticon, a little lower down.
Meaning that while being accurate, I was also being tongue-in-cheek.
You completely missed the point. I am very aware of what it was used for in TOS.United Space Ship. It was used in TOS,
You completely missed the point. I am very aware of what it was used for in TOS.
Furthermore you missed the emoticon, a little lower down.
Meaning that while being accurate, I was also being tongue-in-cheek.
After all, wasn't someone recently complaining about the lack of education in today's world? Posting correct information helps to educate others.I understood what you posted, I put correct information out there because correct information is important.
For my 26th Century Head Canon, (I know it's not official Canon), I have a different set of initialisms.
U.S.S. =
UFP (United Federation of Planets)
StarFleet
StarShip
N.C.C. = Has 3 seperate meanings depending on what Stage a StarShip is in
Stage 1 = Paper Work & Construction Agreement
NCC = Naval Construction Contract
Stage 2 = Physical Hull Markings
NCC = Naval Construction Code
Stage 3 = Digital IFF codes
NCC = Navigational Contact Code
It's my "26th Century Head Canon", so I will over think EVERYTHING.You’re overthinking it.
Yep. Canon and continuity are two different things.Plus, of course, any large canon contains multiple contradictions, like James R. Kirk/James T. Kirk, or "The Alternative Factor" saying a matter-antimatter reaction would destroy the whole universe when everything else in Trek says M/AM is the power source for warp engines. So just because something appears on a screen once doesn't mean it's gospel. Especially if it's a minor background detail.
Decades ago my theory was NCC was just what came after NCB and there was a whole sequence starting with AAA.
We're too used to acronyms to consider this:
Also puts me in mind of old-style telephone exchange phone numbers:
![]()
Telephone exchange names - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You're probably thinking of Gene Roddenberry's quote in The Making of Star Trek regarding the use of the word "mark" in giving course directions. "Why use the word 'mark'? Well, I guess it sounded semimilitary and seminavigational."Yes, the NCC meaning "Naval Construction Contract" was coined in the Enterprise blueprints or tech manual... a good idea but a fan creation, not canonical. I think The World of Star Trek had a paragraph about it had no defined meaning, but was just picked because it sounded semimilitary and seminavigational.
You're probably thinking of Gene Roddenberry's quote in The Making of Star Trek regarding the use of the word "mark" in giving course directions. "Why use the word 'mark'? Well, I guess it sounded semimilitary and seminavigational."
In three-dimensional space, course directions have to be given in both the horizontal and vertical planes. The word "mark" is simply a way of separating the first statement in degrees from the second statement in degrees. Here on Earth, a course direction is a single number (e.g., "come to course zero-nine-zero"), hence no separating word is necessary.I was surprised to learn that it wasn't an actual usage. What do they use instead in real life?
Here on Earth, a course direction is a single number (e.g., "come to course zero-nine-zero"), hence no separating word is necessary.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.