• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Aviation Geeks unite?! Anybody else care about planes here?

What's your level of interest in aviation?!


  • Total voters
    50
I wonder if that would make more sense on Titan…. low gravity but still has a think atmosphere.

Combo rover wheels and airfoils

Ironically, the Enterprise shape does better at high speeds over Star Wars ships?
 
Last edited:
OK didn't realise rockets travel around that fast at launch
Oh, those can go WAY faster.
The Space Shuttle needs to maintain Mach 22.808 or (17,500 mph) to maintain Orbital Velocity.

But the Space Shuttle isn't trying to fly consistently within Atmosphere, it's in LEO (Low Earth Orbit), well into the Vacuum of Space.

So that's a completely different problem that they are trying to solve.

Intentionally flying that fast while still in Atmosphere is a different challenge.

Remember this fun little fact:
401,280' = 76 mi = 122.310 km ~ 122 km = Space Shuttle uses Aircraft Control Surfaces instead of Steering Thrusters AKA (RCS).

So the Maximum Altitude you can fly before you basically need RCS for control of your vehicle is that hard limit.

Ignore the 100 km Karman Line or USAF's 50 mi definition of what altitude "Space is".

IMO, if your vehicle can use Aircraft Control Surfaces to steer, then you're within Atmosphere, even if it's the furthest edge of that definition.

The moment your vessel requires RCS to properly manuever, you're in the "Vacuum of Space".

IMO, that should be the new definition of what Altitude should Space officially be.
 
Last edited:
An odd effect has been seen in fluids:

I wonder if that could be used in MHDs?
 
A horrible accident has occurred—here the chopper fuselage fell independently of the tail rotor?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
A horrible accident has occurred—here the chopper fuselage fell independently of the rotor blades that came down like a giant shuriken
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


That happened last week, what the heck is going on with aircraft lately? is it a lack of proper care and maintenance?
 
OK didn't realise rockets travel around that fast at launch
They don't. They build speed over time. At Max-Q, for instance, the highest aerodynamic pressure on its body at launch, Falcon 9 is only doing around 1000mph and is just entering the stratosphere (about the same as the Space Shuttle). Launch vehicles don't reach those high hypersonic mach numbers until they are well out of most of the earths atmosphere.

A scramjet missile needs to stay in atmo to breathe enough air to keep its engine running. They'll be built to withstand that kind of extreme heat, just like an ICMB's MIRV is (Rapid deceleration before deployment over ground target) . That whole problem of airflow at those speeds has been a problem for years. If you ever look at the old F4 Phantom 2, you'll notice those odd vertical panels between the air intakes and the fueselage: those were used to automatically slow air down going into the intakes at really high speed to keep the supersonic air from hitting the engines. Other really fast jets like Concorde had similar solutions to the problem.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top