• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Russell T. Davies Returns to Doctor Who as New Showrunner

I totally see RTD's point re disabled villains (see also the way a god 50% of Bond villains--if not Moore-- are disfigured in some way) and making a decision going forward to no longer have villains in wheelchairs is absolutely ok with me, but Davros is an established character with a very established look, so either leave him as he is or just choose not to use him.

The Bond villain thing is always a weird one, because (a) Bond himself originally had a facial scar (b) because of its proximity to WW2, disability from injury was rarely seen as a hallmark of a baddy (except duelling scars, because that says ‘german officer’) and more about having gone through stuff. Time moves on from that, and the original more benign reasoning gets lost. By the same token, *most* Bond villains are not disabled, and even ‘disfigured’ are probably in the minority — but the ‘most famous’ one usually is, Blofeld. In fact… basically, outside of the Connery and Craig era, I find it hard to think of that many. Does Scaramangas third nipple count? Does Alec’s facial scarring count in Goldeneye, given we see what causes it? Electra had the eat thing I guess, and her boyfriend was also scarred up… none disabled though, and Craig Bond kept his scars all under his shirt.

RTD is just wrong on Davros though. I wonder what he would make of Sharaz Jek these days?
Not sure he’s even a villain.

In fact, I think RTD has written more overtly disabled villains than anyone else. He even made The Master have Mental Health issues as opposed to just being villainous. I spoke he gave the Doctor some PTSD too.
 
Let's consider the villains of the most recent era.

Le Chiffre; scar across his eye and he weeps blood.
Green: Nope he's perfectly normal
Silva: Horribly disfigured due to cyanide poisoning to the point where he has to wear a metal prosthetic to replace his jaw.
Blofeld: initially not until Bond blows half his face off!
Safin: Face badly scarred from poison when he was a child

So that's 80% of the Craig era villains disfigured in some way (you could argue a lower % by saying Blofeld is unmarked for most of his screen time I guess)

Even if we see how it happened, even if Bond caused it it still feeds into the reductive narrative that ugly=evil
 
Let's consider the villains of the most recent era.

Le Chiffre; scar across his eye and he weeps blood.
Green: Nope he's perfectly normal
Silva: Horribly disfigured due to cyanide poisoning to the point where he has to wear a metal prosthetic to replace his jaw.
Blofeld: initially not until Bond blows half his face off!
Safin: Face badly scarred from poison when he was a child

So that's 80% of the Craig era villains disfigured in some way (you could argue a lower % by saying Blofeld is unmarked for most of his screen time I guess)

Even if we see how it happened, even if Bond caused it it still feeds into the reductive narrative that ugly=evil

The most recent era for sure, but I think the point in Silva is that he was a *victim* but how he chooses to react to that is down to his choices thereafter.
But like I said, Connery and Craig Era… it’s dialled down a lot in the Moore era, non-existent in the Daltons, and fifty fifty in the Brosnan, with a definite move into showing how a person ended up with a disfigurement *during their acts* rather than a straightforward ‘looks weird, is evil’ thing anymore. There’s also definitely a move from it being villain to henchman… but then, Bond missed a trick by not having those literary disabled characters show up for the movies (Bonds Secretary, whose name eludes me atm, and Felix Leiter of course in every post LALD story.)
The Craig era is interesting by having a return to that to some extent, but is also the ones which have Bond carry *his* scars from film to film as well.
 
Last edited:
Oh I agree, but on the face of it more feminine than the trousers Whittaker wore

I’ve left the house in outfits more feminine that what they saddled Whittaker with. And more make-up, but hey Ho, that was the nineties.
CBeebies character chic never did catch on, and nor alas did the Justin’s House X Doctor Who crossover that surely would have improved ratings.
 
I’ve left the house in outfits more feminine that what they saddled Whittaker with.
I've seen men at conventions cosplaying as Whittaker. It threw me the first time I saw it, which it shouldn't have been I'd seen women cosplaying as Tennant or Smith for years at that point.

CBeebies character chic never did catch on, and nor alas did the Justin’s House X Doctor Who crossover that surely would have improved ratings.
Who is Justin? Why would he have been working on a House/Doctor Who crossover?

While I enjoyed watching House -- Hugh Laurie is always watchable -- Greg House was a thoroughly irredeemable monster by the end of the series, and I can't imagine that he lasted long on the road after faking his death before getting caught. I am of the firm opinion that he planned the fire and murdered the homeless guy to escape the mess he'd made of his life. I don't care how smart and brilliant he is; crashing his car into Cuddy's home should have ended his career completely. I just can't imagine revisiting House, the character or the series, and I don't see why it would make sense to do so in the context of Doctor Who.
 
I've seen men at conventions cosplaying as Whittaker. It threw me the first time I saw it, which it shouldn't have been I'd seen women cosplaying as Tennant or Smith for years at that point.


Who is Justin? Why would he have been working on a House/Doctor Who crossover?

While I enjoyed watching House -- Hugh Laurie is always watchable -- Greg House was a thoroughly irredeemable monster by the end of the series, and I can't imagine that he lasted long on the road after faking his death before getting caught. I am of the firm opinion that he planned the fire and murdered the homeless guy to escape the mess he'd made of his life. I don't care how smart and brilliant he is; crashing his car into Cuddy's home should have ended his career completely. I just can't imagine revisiting House, the character or the series, and I don't see why it would make sense to do so in the context of Doctor Who.

Not house.
Justin’s House.
Search on iPlayer. There’s at least one recurring character who has a very Doctorish outfit, if not nearly everyone. Am pretty sure Mr.Maker is also a Time Lord, but I don’t think he ever guested on Justin’s House.

 
Not house.
Justin’s House.
Search on iPlayer. There’s at least one recurring character who has a very Doctorish outfit, if not nearly everyone. Am pretty sure Mr.Maker is also a Time Lord, but I don’t think he ever guested on Justin’s House.

Yeah, back when my kids used to watch him, I always thought Mr Tumble’s costume was a marginally more OTT version of Six.
 
Yeah, back when my kids used to watch him, I always thought Mr Tumble’s costume was a marginally more OTT version of Six.

Oh one hundred percent. And the Tumble family feels like Lungbarrow or I.M Foreman at times.
And Robert clearly shares a design lineage with the Voc Robots.

Maybe little monster was a Kaled mutant…

Edit: oh and a quick shout out to Justin’s other spin-off, think it was called Silly Time which was a wonderful throwback to seventies sketch shows, and I think used left over scripts frankly. It was like Python for the under twelves.
 
And even Piers Morgan refered to it in his show, lol... some wanker even mentioned the show's cancelled its too woke or some bullshit.

These idiots have no clue what they're talking about, but it does add to my hypothesis that actually, Chibnall's Who did more harm than good in the long run.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Someone has recorded a BBC iPlayer ad which says Doctor Who Season Two is coming April 12.Link in replies.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The trailer doesn't mention BBC One broadcasting at all, but says BBC iPlayer is coming. I wonder if it will only be broadcasted on BBC iPlayer in England from now on? Will there be no BBC One broadcasting?
 
Last edited:
Says it all when the announcement gets randomly dumped out on a minor rugby match.

But hey only 98 days until this farce is over.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top