Episodic TV. A story contained in less than an hour.If it had been her, we might feel sorrier for her perhaps, knowing what she used to be like (and could be again when the madness left her) than a woman we were introduced to in all her bitterness.
Episodic TV. A story contained in less than an hour.If it had been her, we might feel sorrier for her perhaps, knowing what she used to be like (and could be again when the madness left her) than a woman we were introduced to in all her bitterness.
How many times did a character return for a second episode? A major guest star. Mudd. Riley. That's about it. Making Lester into Rand isn't really a continuity issue. The story isn't really a good fit for Rand.Mmmhmm, but it's not as if there was no continuity, even in an episodic series.
Your idea for Rand to be the Turnabout villain is awesome. I wish I'd thought of it.Mmmhmm, but it's not as if there was no continuity, even in an episodic series.
Janus is a person with two faces. That's brilliant, and it seems to explain why Gene Roddenberry would name Lester "Janice" when there had already been a Janice Rand and a Janet Wallace in Kirk's life. Mystery solved.It occurred to me last night that "Janice" is more like "Janus" - two opposing faces (seeming sanity and madness, or her face and Kirk's).
Carol Marcus should have been “Janelle”.Janus is a person with two faces. That's brilliant, and it seems to explain why Gene Roddenberry would name Lester "Janice" when there had already been a Janice Rand and a Janet Wallace in Kirk's life. Mystery solved.
Once again, I wish I'd thought of it.

Ooh, that's very good.It occurred to me last night that "Janice" is more like "Janus" - two opposing faces (seeming sanity and madness, or her face and Kirk's).
Right - you had to be prepared in advance to use the Atavachron.I guess it's more a side effect of the method of time travel than the travel itself.
I wonder if it's to with getting the person ready to be fully blended with the target historical setting (so they can live out their life without altering the timeline)Right - you had to be prepared in advance to use the Atavachron.
And don't forget the microbiome. A big problem with time travel is that you'll run into bacteria you're not accustomed to, and you'll deliver unfamiliar bugs to the destination.Sort of a zeitgeist acclimatization process, or readying one for the radiation/pollution/pollination, etc levels of the past.
If this is partially true, it would be a good device to use prior to landing parties setting foot on a new planet.
Same impact on the Martians during their invasion.And don't forget the microbiome. A big problem with time travel is that you'll run into bacteria you're not accustomed to, and you'll deliver unfamiliar bugs to the destination.
This also applies to meeting uncontacted peoples, like Columbus did in 1492. The devastation ran both ways, where apparently smallpox was traded for syphilis, and neither side had natural resistance to the foreign bugs. The 15th century syphilis outbreak killed five million Europeans, and ruined the bodies of a much greater number.
I wonder if it's to with getting the person ready to be fully blended with the target historical setting (so they can live out their life without altering the timeline)
Yes, that was clearly stated in the episode.That could also explain Spock's change in personality. The Atavachron makes changes to blend you but if you aren't prepared beforehand you end up like Spock where he reverts to a more primitive mental state. The change would be more obvious than what happened with McCoy or Kirk. YMMV.
And it wasn't even planned to bring Kevin Riley back. Bruce Hyde got cast as the unrelated character Lieutenant Robert Daiken in "The Conscience of the King" and then someone on the Star Trek staff remembered he'd been in "The Naked Time" earlier in the season, so they decided to just use his previous character's name.How many times did a character return for a second episode? A major guest star. Mudd. Riley. That's about it.
How, exactly, was gravity different in 1492 than it is today?Good point. Also, gravity and air quality.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.