A utopia that can't withstand a bit of scrutiny isn't much of a utopia.
Especially when you see leadership problems in Starfleet.A utopia that can't withstand a bit of scrutiny isn't much of a utopia.
A military (or paramilitary) institution will inevitably attract a disproportionate number of power seeking narcissists, sociopaths, and psychopaths.Especially when you see leadership problems in Starfleet.
I think it makes logical sense that there would be a clandestine organization within the Federation to protect against and counter those of other powers. Going by their portrayal in DS9 and Picard S3 I do think it's funny that they manage to be more secretive than the Tal Shiar (their existence isn't even widely known) while being more manipulative, ruthless, and dangerous than the Obsidian Order.You know, some people say that the concept of Section 31 has done more to damage Star Trek than improve it in the long term... and those people are me.
How evolved.A military (or paramilitary) institution will inevitably attract a disproportionate number of power seeking narcissists, sociopaths, and psychopaths.
It makes logical sense for the Federation to have intelligence agencies doing sneaky spy work, investigating threats. Starfleet officers go undercover on alien worlds all the time. Sisko infiltrated a Klingon space station in disguise and bombed a Maquis planet in the same season. And then a season later, when he heard about Section 31, his first reaction was 'We need to send a spy to infiltrate Sloan's group'.
DS9's Section 31 is where you end up when you fall off the moral tightrope that Sisko is walking and he recognises their danger immediately. I don't mind that Section 31 exists, they're just another Badmiral group, but if you buy into Star Trek's premise and its message at all, then they have to be rejected by society the moment they're dragged into the light, and ultimately proven to be unnecessary.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.