• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK: SECTION 31 - Grading & Discussion

Rate the movie...

  • 10 - Excellent!

    Votes: 4 1.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 6 2.5%
  • 8

    Votes: 11 4.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 20 8.5%
  • 6

    Votes: 31 13.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 36 15.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 16 6.8%
  • 3

    Votes: 26 11.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 27 11.4%
  • 1 - Terrible!

    Votes: 59 25.0%

  • Total voters
    236
We don't really know how it would have been as a TV series, as the original creators were not involved with the movie at all.

We know they borrowed concepts from it, but who knows how much they changed them. At least one of the TV version creators wasn't a fan.
Not entirely true. Craig Sweeney was the showrunner and he consolidated and condensed the 10 episodes into a 90-minute script.
 
What was she supposed to be?

I wondered if she was a hologram and another AI? Or if those were like standard cybernetic implants on the side of her head (since “Discovery” introduced the idea that the Federation had people who were modified because of accidents)?

Or is the implication that Section 31 had contact with the Borg long before Q threw the Enterprise-D towards them, and this version of Control was someone Section 31 was able to save from the Collective?

At the beginning (right before Jamie Lee Curtis says "This is Control") and the end of the briefing you can hear a variation of the Borg theme music (Horns) from First Contact.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

And "Control" as a code name for the person in charge or AI of a super secret black ops organization. Where did we hear that before?

Izawzf4.jpeg

kGr3Kcj.jpeg

R31KU5L.jpeg
 
How many TOS references or story did we get with Disco?. Mirror universe, Guardian of Forever, Pike and the Talosians etc. all in the first season I think.
Mirror Universe was Season 1, Pike and the Talosians was Season 2, and the Guardian of Forever was Season 3. Season 2 also used footage from 'The Cage' in a Previously On Star Trek segment.

Both seasons 3 and Season 5 used footage from TNG as in-universe footage.
 
Mirror Universe was Season 1, Pike and the Talosians was Season 2, and the Guardian of Forever was Season 3. Season 2 also used footage from 'The Cage' in a Previously On Star Trek segment.

Both seasons 3 and Season 5 used footage from TNG as in-universe footage.

Ah ok. The seasons are so short it just feels like it was all at once.
 
This was bad. Very bad. I came in with no preconceived ideas or expectations. I hadn't read any news about this project in years and I had not seen the trailer or any reviews. I just saw it pop up on Paramount+ and decided to watch. I liked Discovery more than most and I found the Georgiou character to be good fun. Unfortunately I'd have to say this was the worst piece of Trek I've ever seen. I realize that sounds hyperbolic, but I honestly can't think of any episode or movie in the franchise that I've enjoyed less.

I almost turned it off after the first 20 minutes or so, and to be honest I'm not really sure why I continued besides blind loyalty to the franchise and being an obsessive completionist.

There was very little I liked. The Georgiou flashbacks were the only parts that really kept my attention. I found the rest of it really hard to follow. I didn't care for the characters much and the plot barely existed. But really it was the directing style that ruined it for me. I absolutely hated the constant zooms and weird camera movements. It was extremely distracting. It reminded me of movies like Guardians of the Galaxy, which I turned off after 20 minutes because I couldn't stand the style. It's just moving from one big action sequence to the next, which I don't find entertaining at all.

I hated the "one last job" tropes and the terrible jokes. Very bad writing. It felt like a low quality heist movie with some Star Trek cosplay thrown in.

I haven't really been visiting TrekBBS much lately, but I had to rush here to see the response because I just simply couldn't believe that this movie somehow got made. I give it a 1.5/10.
+1
 
Watched it once and although I am trying to get myself to watch it again to try and find some positives, I neither want to watch it again nor can I think of many positives. Gave it a 2.

Story was not that imaginative, some of the action pieces didn't work (one has been brought up in a number of reviews and for Star Trek was inexcusable), the story behind Georgiou becoming Emperor doesn't quite fit to how the Empire works and the goal of the device that had to be retrieved makes no sense. Those were only a few of the disappointments I saw.

Not sure why Garrett was left in this when it was made into a movie, other than to get fans to watch and see a future Enterprise Captain in a time period we know little about.

If some stories are true that some of the push to make this was because Michelle Yeoh wanted to do it, then there should now be a ban on any vanity projects for Star Trek being done ever again. Stewart's insistence on how to go about the first couple seasons of Picard and this should be a lesson to everyone involved that maybe get a good story first and tell all actors involved that no compromises in that to feed their egos.

I honestly don't think I've ever had a time where I've felt no desire to do another viewing of something with Star Trek until now.
 
Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.
I don't understand what's so hard to grasp. I'm sure if the Discovery team had done that, there would've been zero complaints.

But, as I've said before, what's done is done. Life goes on, so does the franchise.
I just watched Alien: Romulus the other night. That movie commits to doing the sets in the same manner and set design as Ridley Scott had for the Nostromo in 1979. And it works. For Andor, Tony Gilroy made all of the sets in the same style as what George Lucas had for A New Hope in 1977
I've tried the Alien and Star Wars angle before, and it always hits a brick wall. I guarantee that modern audiences wouldn't have cared if the TOS look was recreated and refreshed. Trek fans often put the show on pedestal, demanding that it must be updated to maintain a true vision of the future, but the reality is that it is viewed no less differently to Alien and Star Wars from outside the community. It's just some sci-fi thing that sometimes has good episodes and films.

(Check out the new Alien:Earth teaser, when you have a chance)
When I look at the Strange New Worlds bridge (and some of the other stylistic and story choices they've made), I don't get the feeling this is one day going to be the same place as what I saw in TOS. It feels like it's its own thing. And there's nothing wrong with that if people love this version of Star Trek. But I don't feel that connection to it in the same way.
I'm trying my hardest, and it's kept me going so far. It would've been sad to watch Better Call Saul and not believe Breaking Bad came next. I'm the oddball of the group, i know, but i can already see a vast difference between the tech in Discovery vs Strange New Worlds. It feels like a midpoint, if you squint enough.

Marks for effort.
 
They’re not looking to get them “right.” Rather to reinterpret them.

Theyre looking to put their own stamp on it to make star trek their creation. Its not. If they wanted a remake stsr trek they should have made a new sandbox instead of trying to shoehorn their vision into a previous one. They wont stop their "reinterpret" which is why we get garbage like std and s32.
 
The TrekBBS equivalent of Godwin's Law is that any thread allowed to run long enough will turn into an argument about the SNW Enterprise and visual continuity.
Is this when I bring up the bridge rotation angle?

A lot better than thd junk kurtzman is doing. They cant even get the uniforms straight or the view screen right.

“I don’t like it, it makes me feel icky” is not an argument. It’s an opinion.
 
I don't understand what's so hard to grasp. I'm sure if the Discovery team had done that, there would've been zero complaints.
John Eaves designed multiple variations to give the Discovery production team choices. Some of those choices would have been much closer to the TOS design.
Screen-Shot-2019-03-22-at-8.00.07-PM.png

Per TrekMovie.com, the decision to sweep the nacelle pylons back to mimic the TMP Enterprise was inserted by the VFX team when they were building the CGI model.
 
John Eaves designed multiple variations to give the Discovery production team choices. Some of those choices would have been much closer to the TOS design.
Screen-Shot-2019-03-22-at-8.00.07-PM.png

Per TrekMovie.com, the decision to sweep the nacelle pylons back to mimic the TMP Enterprise was inserted by the VFX team when they were building the CGI model.
IIRC, Eaves and his team envisaged it slowly being refitted/retrofitted into Kirk's ship over time. Not that I think that anyone will adhere to that concept, but it's the thought that counts.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top