Not entirely true. Craig Sweeney was the showrunner and he consolidated and condensed the 10 episodes into a 90-minute script.We don't really know how it would have been as a TV series, as the original creators were not involved with the movie at all.
We know they borrowed concepts from it, but who knows how much they changed them. At least one of the TV version creators wasn't a fan.
What was she supposed to be?
I wondered if she was a hologram and another AI? Or if those were like standard cybernetic implants on the side of her head (since “Discovery” introduced the idea that the Federation had people who were modified because of accidents)?
Or is the implication that Section 31 had contact with the Borg long before Q threw the Enterprise-D towards them, and this version of Control was someone Section 31 was able to save from the Collective?
We do not recognize “STE” retcons as canon.Ah but STE changed that. They basically showed that the winky blinkies were just a type of screen saver and that a crew member could acess the panel when needed. Baiscally when not in use we see the screen go back to winky blinkies. So it was a pefectly excellent explanation.
Mirror Universe was Season 1, Pike and the Talosians was Season 2, and the Guardian of Forever was Season 3. Season 2 also used footage from 'The Cage' in a Previously On Star Trek segment.How many TOS references or story did we get with Disco?. Mirror universe, Guardian of Forever, Pike and the Talosians etc. all in the first season I think.
We do not recognize “STE” retcons as canon.
They’re not looking to get them “right.” Rather to reinterpret them.A lot better than thd junk kurtzman is doing. They cant even get the uniforms straight or the view screen right.
Mirror Universe was Season 1, Pike and the Talosians was Season 2, and the Guardian of Forever was Season 3. Season 2 also used footage from 'The Cage' in a Previously On Star Trek segment.
Both seasons 3 and Season 5 used footage from TNG as in-universe footage.
+1This was bad. Very bad. I came in with no preconceived ideas or expectations. I hadn't read any news about this project in years and I had not seen the trailer or any reviews. I just saw it pop up on Paramount+ and decided to watch. I liked Discovery more than most and I found the Georgiou character to be good fun. Unfortunately I'd have to say this was the worst piece of Trek I've ever seen. I realize that sounds hyperbolic, but I honestly can't think of any episode or movie in the franchise that I've enjoyed less.
I almost turned it off after the first 20 minutes or so, and to be honest I'm not really sure why I continued besides blind loyalty to the franchise and being an obsessive completionist.
There was very little I liked. The Georgiou flashbacks were the only parts that really kept my attention. I found the rest of it really hard to follow. I didn't care for the characters much and the plot barely existed. But really it was the directing style that ruined it for me. I absolutely hated the constant zooms and weird camera movements. It was extremely distracting. It reminded me of movies like Guardians of the Galaxy, which I turned off after 20 minutes because I couldn't stand the style. It's just moving from one big action sequence to the next, which I don't find entertaining at all.
I hated the "one last job" tropes and the terrible jokes. Very bad writing. It felt like a low quality heist movie with some Star Trek cosplay thrown in.
I haven't really been visiting TrekBBS much lately, but I had to rush here to see the response because I just simply couldn't believe that this movie somehow got made. I give it a 1.5/10.
I don't understand what's so hard to grasp. I'm sure if the Discovery team had done that, there would've been zero complaints.Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.
I've tried the Alien and Star Wars angle before, and it always hits a brick wall. I guarantee that modern audiences wouldn't have cared if the TOS look was recreated and refreshed. Trek fans often put the show on pedestal, demanding that it must be updated to maintain a true vision of the future, but the reality is that it is viewed no less differently to Alien and Star Wars from outside the community. It's just some sci-fi thing that sometimes has good episodes and films.I just watched Alien: Romulus the other night. That movie commits to doing the sets in the same manner and set design as Ridley Scott had for the Nostromo in 1979. And it works. For Andor, Tony Gilroy made all of the sets in the same style as what George Lucas had for A New Hope in 1977
I'm trying my hardest, and it's kept me going so far. It would've been sad to watch Better Call Saul and not believe Breaking Bad came next. I'm the oddball of the group, i know, but i can already see a vast difference between the tech in Discovery vs Strange New Worlds. It feels like a midpoint, if you squint enough.When I look at the Strange New Worlds bridge (and some of the other stylistic and story choices they've made), I don't get the feeling this is one day going to be the same place as what I saw in TOS. It feels like it's its own thing. And there's nothing wrong with that if people love this version of Star Trek. But I don't feel that connection to it in the same way.
Because it's not about right but expression.They’re not looking to get them “right.” Rather to reinterpret them.
Almost like art is involved.Because it's not about right but expression.
They’re not looking to get them “right.” Rather to reinterpret them.
Is this when I bring up the bridge rotation angle?The TrekBBS equivalent of Godwin's Law is that any thread allowed to run long enough will turn into an argument about the SNW Enterprise and visual continuity.
A lot better than thd junk kurtzman is doing. They cant even get the uniforms straight or the view screen right.
Sorry, what is STE?We do not recognize “STE” retcons as canon.
John Eaves designed multiple variations to give the Discovery production team choices. Some of those choices would have been much closer to the TOS design.I don't understand what's so hard to grasp. I'm sure if the Discovery team had done that, there would've been zero complaints.
IIRC, Eaves and his team envisaged it slowly being refitted/retrofitted into Kirk's ship over time. Not that I think that anyone will adhere to that concept, but it's the thought that counts.John Eaves designed multiple variations to give the Discovery production team choices. Some of those choices would have been much closer to the TOS design.
![]()
Per TrekMovie.com, the decision to sweep the nacelle pylons back to mimic the TMP Enterprise was inserted by the VFX team when they were building the CGI model.
NoTheyre looking to put their own stamp on it to make star trek their creation. Its not. If they wanted a remake stsr trek they should have made a new sandbox instead of trying to shoehorn their vision into a previous one. They wont stop their "reinterpret" which is why we get garbage like std and s32.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.