It really didn't. It looked like a novelty that was there purely for nostalgia.It looked much more advanced than the NX ships.
It really didn't. It looked like a novelty that was there purely for nostalgia.It looked much more advanced than the NX ships.
Because it stars an actress famous for her martial arts abilities.Why were there so many fights?
Enterprise already had the TOS style ship in the episide "In A Mirror Darkly". It worked great. They even updated the console and view screen graaphics. It looked much more advanced than the NX ships.
It really didn't. It looked like a novelty that was there purely for nostalgia.
One of the best bits of reasoning I've seen on the issue.Yes, I see lots of Star Trek fans posting on Star Trek boards that it looked fine. But that's a pretty self-selective audience. And it was the exact same audience who were still watching Enterprise towards the end.
It's pretty simple: when producers want to evoke nostalgia, they replicate the old designs, c.f. Relics, Tribbles, Mirror Darkly, Picard S3.
When they want viewers to look at it as something new, futuristic and exciting, they change the look: TMP, TNG, ST09, DSC, SNW. All were criticised by existing fans to some extent at the time.
Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.Enterprise already had the TOS style ship in the episide "In A Mirror Darkly". It worked great. They even updated the console and view screen graaphics. It looked much more advanced than the NX ships.
It was an Asylum film with a budget.![]()
Yeah, those were all motion pictures from the late 1970s.Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.
I just watched Alien: Romulus the other night. That movie commits to doing the sets in the same manner and set design as Ridley Scott had for the Nostromo in 1979. And it works. For Andor, Tony Gilroy made all of the sets in the same style as what George Lucas had for A New Hope in 1977 (e.g., some of the Imperial sets use black and white monitors).
Beyond that, people are watching Star Trek. The audience already is primed to accept the reality of TOS as that version of "the future," and will go with it if the people who produce the show go with it too.
Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.
I just watched Alien: Romulus the other night. That movie commits to doing the sets in the same manner and set design as Ridley Scott had for the Nostromo in 1979. And it works. For Andor, Tony Gilroy made all of the sets in the same style as what George Lucas had for A New Hope in 1977 (e.g., some of the Imperial sets use black and white monitors).
Beyond that, people are watching Star Trek. The audience already is primed to accept the reality of TOS as that version of "the future," and will go with it if the people who produce the show go with it too.
As a lifelong Star Trek fan since after Star Wars but before Star Trek The Motion Picture, all I can say to that is that when we first saw the Enterprise bridge in Discovery season 2, it sent a shiver down my spine. I thought they recreated the design of the original in a very respectful way without making it look like it was made of plywood. It wasn't perfect. If I recall correctly, I remember thinking that they didn't need so many bloody lights on the bridge, but it was still the Enterprise bridge to me and it made my fanboy heart full.Yeah, the idea that you can't find a way to do the TOS ship in a modern setting is something I don't agree with at all.
I just watched Alien: Romulus the other night. That movie commits to doing the sets in the same manner and set design as Ridley Scott had for the Nostromo in 1979. And it works. For Andor, Tony Gilroy made all of the sets in the same style as what George Lucas had for A New Hope in 1977 (e.g., some of the Imperial sets use black and white monitors).
Beyond that, people are watching Star Trek. The audience already is primed to accept the reality of TOS as that version of "the future," and will go with it if the people who produce the show go with it too.
It really didn't. It looked like a novelty that was there purely for nostalgia.
If it has “computer graphics “ it’s definitely not a TOS style ship.So if there a real enterprise TOS style ship orbiting the earth today and you got a chance to visit it and they took you to the bridge and all the consoles had computer graphics(behind the winky blinkies which are screen savers) you would tell them it looks like a primitive ship and primitive bridge?
So if there a real enterprise TOS style ship orbiting the earth today and you got a chance to visit it and they took you to the bridge and all the consoles had computer graphics(behind the winky blinkies which are screen savers) you would tell them it looks like a primitive ship and primitive bridge?
If people like it and identify with it, more power to you and I'm not going to take it away from those that really love it. But, speaking only for myself, I think it's great production and set design. And props to the people who created it. However, it doesn't feel connected to TOS for me.As a lifelong Star Trek fan since after Star Wars but before Star Trek The Motion Picture, all I can say to that is that when we first saw the Enterprise bridge in Discovery season 2, it sent a shiver down my spine. I thought they recreated the design of the original in a very respectful way without making it look like it was made of plywood. It wasn't perfect. If I recall correctly, I remember thinking that they didn't need so many bloody lights on the bridge, but it was still the Enterprise bridge to me, and it made my fanboy heart full.
So far, 39 people voted one. 2 people voted ten.Right from the start I said don't count the ones or the tens. I am however, legitimately shocked to see some tens. Nope they don't count either. The ones and the tens are what are the trolling is.
I always do, in every poll of this sort. I'm not going to move the goal posts now.So far, 39 people voted one. 2 people voted ten.
One has gotten the highest number of votes. But you want to disregard that?
I would.So far, 39 people voted one. 2 people voted ten.
One has gotten the highest number of votes. But you want to disregard that?
We don't really know how it would have been as a TV series, as the original creators were not involved with the movie at all.Thank god it didn't become a TV series.
If it has “computer graphics “ it’s definitely not a TOS style ship.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.