As side effects of “celestial anomalies “ go that one is pretty benign.I'm sorry, but asking me to accept the existence of celestial anomalies that cause people to break out into song is a huge ask of me.![]()
As side effects of “celestial anomalies “ go that one is pretty benign.I'm sorry, but asking me to accept the existence of celestial anomalies that cause people to break out into song is a huge ask of me.![]()
As side effects of “celestial anomalies “ go that one is pretty benign.
What doesn’t cause time travel?Or crystals that cause time travel.
Why is this spoiler coded?So, Phillipa Georgiou once again can't sever ties with her past and that past tries to kill her. We saw already saw this in Discovery, there's no need to show it twice. The opera singer annoyed me, and Jamie Lee Curtis has not enough screen time. Also, it felt like J.J.Abrams directed it. Why is Phillipa are breathe air like 10.000 feet in the air? And is Rachell Garret doing in this timeline?
The movie is set in the early 24th cenctury, possibly 2324 (at the very least sometime after 2314), so why can't she be there?And is Rachell Garret doing in this timeline?
Why is this spoiler coded?
What timeline do you think this is? It’s the early 24th Century of the Prime Universe. Somewhere between TUC and TNG.
Not if the thread has a spoiler tag in the title.Isn't it the norm to put something in a spoiler box for 6 months?
It was Georgiou who time travelled. Last time we saw her she was going through the Guardian of Forever to some point before the 32nd CenturyDiscovery takes place 10 years before Kirk is captain, so either Phillipa and San are 110 years old or Rachel Garret time travelled
Phillipa time travelled in season 3 of Discovery... She went from the 32nd century to the early 24th.Isn't it the norm to put something in a spoiler box for 6 months? Also, It's just weird. Discovery takes place 10 years before Kirk is captain, so either Phillipa and San are 110 years old or Rachel Garret time travelled
Not in a thread marked “spoilers “.Isn't it the norm to put something in a spoiler box for 6 months? Also, It's just weird. Discovery takes place 10 years before Kirk is captain, so either Phillipa and San are 110 years old or Rachel Garret time travelled
It's not as if we haven't seen time discrepancies in travel between the prime and mirror universes before. In fact, this would be the third time that has happened, after the prime Defiant moved backwards in time to the mirror universe, and Discovery moving 9 months into the future returning from the mirror universe.San is the odd one out here, not Rachel or Georgiou.
Despite what I thought of the TV Movie, with different writing, I'd be for it.Now that the kinks are out, I wouldn't mind seeing a sequel. The core characters here are fine, though Wisp/Fuzz could tone it down. In a sequel I would like to see them connect it more to the wider Trek world, and see things like:
-Talarians and maybe the start of that war; ditto with the Cardassians and Tzenkethi; I also would like to see what's going on with the Tholians and Gorn.
-The Tomed Incident (or its aftermath); an opportunity to introduce Sela's father or revisit younger Laris and Zhaban.
-Is Azetbur still chancellor? Where is K'mpec or Mogh, etc. for that matter?
-The Enterprise-B, or maybe the Enterprise-C
-The fate of legends like Sulu, Chekov, Saavik
-Captain Uhura
-Harriman and Demora Sulu
-Curzon Dax
-Tuvok
-Dr. Noonien Soong
-Bringing M'Ress and Arex to live-action
-Phlox: Do we know the lifespan of Denobulans?
-Where is Pelia during this time?
-Missed opportunity not to have Morn sitting at the bar already.
-Section 31 vs. Tal Shiar or Obsidian Order
There's a lot of Trek seasoning they could sprinkle into a sequel (s).
Exactly. That's how I feel about the Legacy concept. I'd love to see it move forward, but with someone other than Lord Terry.Despite what I thought of the TV Movie, with different writing, I'd be for it.
LOWER DECKS has multiple visual references to the TOS 2260's look. It also has an off hand reference to something involving Pike, a poster with an odd Constitution-class configuration, and a Starbase featuring odd looking uniforms that might be identified by someone familiar with the Kelvin Timeline films. I've seen every LOWER DECKS episode, so there are just some unanswered questions...
There's nothing to say that the DISCOVERY timeline version of the 24th century might be much closer in visual continuity to the classic timeline than the 23rd century. Perhaps there's a Disco-Cerritos in that timeline too? Maybe we even saw that ship in the series finale?
Anyways, there are threads that run into near 100 pages to explore this further.
S31 has its own time issues, like what happened to San for 70 some years.
Thanks for the heads up, now I know not to use the spoiler box in it's already in the titleNot if the thread has a spoiler tag in the title.
It was Georgiou who time travelled. Last time we saw her she was going through the Guardian of Forever to some point before the 32nd Century
San is the odd one out here, not Rachel or Georgiou.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.