• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers STAR TREK: SECTION 31 - Grading & Discussion

Rate the movie...

  • 10 - Excellent!

    Votes: 4 1.7%
  • 9

    Votes: 6 2.5%
  • 8

    Votes: 11 4.7%
  • 7

    Votes: 20 8.5%
  • 6

    Votes: 31 13.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 36 15.3%
  • 4

    Votes: 16 6.8%
  • 3

    Votes: 26 11.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 27 11.4%
  • 1 - Terrible!

    Votes: 59 25.0%

  • Total voters
    236
The movie was a big mess in shining lights. Sort of a comedy? Reminded me of the first seasons of Picard. One known character + a bunch of unknowns. Maybe it could have been better if they had brought back someone else from Discovery. I don't know. Gave it a 6.
 
Alok says he 'slept' for most of the last 350 years. Did the augments launch another sleeper ship besides the Botany Bay?

Also this movie says the Eugenics Wars are in the 20th century again lmao.
Yeah, he's slightly off the original date. It's nothing that hast been done in other Trek many times, and doesn't really effect the movie itself in any notable way, despite the nitpicking.
 
Apparently whoever wrote that just entered the stardate given into the first webpage google result for stardate calculator and got 2324 returned (I tried it and I got April 17, 2324). To my knowledge the Earth year is never given in the movie, and there are no official "stardate calculators" so this dating is entirely based off of entering the stardate into a fan stardate calculator, which the Memory Alpha entry writer must have used.
We can date it by Rachel Garrett's age. It's roughly around 2330. 2325 isn't out of the question. She was 44 in 2344 when she died.
 
The movie isn’t getting bad reviews because there are no starships in it. It’s getting bad reviews because it is a bad movie.
To be honest that's exactly what a lot of this is, lots of preconceived BS. Maybe 30%? Same way a lot of people in polls vote either really high or absolute low. People can be really unimaginative, black and white. Know anyone like that?

Anyway, it's nice to see half the voters here consider it average or above at this point, because the stuff I've seen online would make you think this is STV scale horrible, when it's not even within several galaxies distance of that travesty.

The reviews really are quite dire. The bandwagon jumpers win!

Meanwhile I'll be enjoying it again today as Paramount + smiles away at the viewers.
 
I had very low expectations going into the Section 31 movie, especially after seeing interviews saying "Oh, we know what you're worried about!" that then proceeded to prove they have no clue what I was worried about.

My primary concern since the project was initially announced (originally as a spin-off series that thankfully simply became a streaming film): The continued, fundamental misunderstanding of Section 31 that stemmed from the early seasons of Discovery.

Instead of a covert shadow organization that quietly pulled the strings from behind the scenes under the guise of "protecting the Federation," Section 31 is now instead a flashy black ops in plain sight, complete with eye-rolling black Starfleet insignia.

The only point of hope for me was at least enjoying Michelle Yeoh doing what she does best: Kicking ass with smirks and quips aplenty. Unfortunately, that's all we got (that and one cool character concept).

The film is instead full of exposition dumps, kitschy cringeworthy dialogue, brick-heavy subtlety, action sequences on the level of the awful Abrams films, and breaking the basic writing rule of showing not telling. But the worst sin of all? There's nothing remotely Star Trek about this film.

Yes, Rachel Garrett is in the film but this she does not align with the character who we met in "Yesterday's Enterprise." Even if you put aside the absurdity of a Starfleet officer overseeing a Section 31 operation (again, misunderstanding the concept), her characterization is all over the place.

I welcome the exploration of the darker sides of the Star Trek universe (one of the many reasons why I'm a Niner and why that show remains my favorite of the franchise) but that's simply not what this film did.

The film does some nice character exploration for Mirror Georgiou. But the problem for me is that I never liked Mirror Georgiou. That's a me problem, I know, but it's hard to move past that and instead feels like a waste of Yeoh's talents.

The Final Frontier had the campfire scene, McCoy facing his pain, and the wasted potential of David Warner.

Nemesis had the Riker/Troi wedding and the wasted potential of Tom Hardy and Ron Perlman.

Section 31 had a microscopic alien that piloted a robot and the wasted potential of Michelle Yeoh.

When your best attributes are a cool idea that was wasted on an asshole character and a solid character arc for genocidal monster that's inexplicably on the path of redemption, all of which are outshined by singular scenes of Star Trek's worst films, something has gone terribly, horribly wrong.

Yep. I’m actually pretty charitable toward just about all of modern Trek but this movie was a massive miss, in both concept and execution. What a waste.
 
Do we think the weapon failed to detonate on the other side of the mirror while crossing? Is the nebula pulsar consistent with how DS9 used to be able to interact with Terrans?

Overall, I got nothing against fun stories set in the universe as established in the many Star Treks including its fringes, even when they're not particularly preachy about something.
 
Do we think the weapon failed to detonate on the other side of the mirror while crossing? Is the nebula pulsar consistent with how DS9 used to be able to interact with Terrans?
Not really.

First time they connected to the Mirror Universe in DS9 it was because of damage to a Runabout passing through the Wormhole.

For every instance after that, people in the Mirror Universe were able to duplicate the malfunction to the Transporter in "Mirror, Mirror" from TOS to beam between universes.
 
So now the Eugenics Wars are in the 1990s again? I guess they now take place in two different decades and both are correct because of temporal agents.

This movie still sucks. Tried rewatching a little more, and it barely improved.
 
To save my sanity, the way I'm looking at it is that temporal agents from all factions are continually frustrated that no matter what they do to alter the Eugenics Wars, nothing from the 22nd century onwards ever changes at all even slightly. Everything naturally ends up exactly as it was, with only the years that get mentioned being different.

Maybe a Q is putting it back again to amuse themself, I don't know.
 
Another thing!

Georgiou’s dialogue sounds like they asked a 13 year old boy to write for her. Just super cringe all around.

I keep thinking of new things that were bad. I need to cleanse my palette with something else.
 
So now the Eugenics Wars are in the 1990s again?
He just says he was born in the 20th century. The wars could still be in the 21st. Or maybe temporal agents did put them back and it was only SNW that was filmed during a supertime where they were in the 21st century. DS9, after all, put them in the 22nd century, so I think the wars just slide up and down the timeline so at any given day a textbook will say they were at any given point.
 
It's whenever the writer wants it to be, or happens to find first on Google. I'm leaning towards the latter, in this case.
It's possible. The final script writer is Craig Sweeny apparently, with Bo Yeon Kim and Erika Lippoldt still getting general story credit. And a quick look at Memory Alpha and IMDB shows Sweeny's last Trek work was way back in Discovery's Season 1, meaning he may not have been up to speed on the recent redating of the Eugenics Wars. Considering how rushed this whole movie seems to have been, they either didn't catch the implications of Alok's dialogue or did catch it and were like "Is this worth a reshoot/rewrite just to satisfy an extremely niche set of Trek fans meticulously analyzing the timeline? No it isn't"
 
This was a very mediocre movie, and a bad Star Trek movie.
It had that "trying too much to be cool and relate to what we think younger audiences want" vibe that seems to be in all these mediocre to bad productions.

Some things to note:
A lot of contrivances. It was really nice of the Terrans to move the weapon plot to the main universe so Georgiou can accidently meet her old flame.

Georgiou seemed to lose much of her DIS character growth. As much as I didn't care much for DIS, she did have off the wall funny lines which were also absent here.

There are some nice concepts here which weren't explored before in ST: Mech suits, tiny life forms. But they were badly executed. The Vulcan robot guy was annoying. Tip to writers: if a character is annoying to the other characters, they are also annoying to the audience.

This feels like a TV pilot. I thought we would be getting some deeper insight to S31, but we got nothing. New viewers will have no idea what S31 is even about. (Note: if you are a secret organization, don't play your mission briefings in plain view of a crowded bar).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top