To summarize, is this zombie cat nonsense saying that random quantum states cannot be applied to the macroscopic scale?to illustrate a paradox of quantum superposition wherein a hypothetical cat may be considered both alive and dead simultaneously because its fate is linked to a random event that may (or may not) occur.
No, I don't think so.To summarize, is this zombie cat nonsense saying that random quantum states cannot be applied to the macroscopic scale?
Well, I've lost interest with these ridiculously short messages. If you want to discuss quantum physics, start a thread or PM me.No, I don't think so.
It answered the question. I had no idea there was a character maximum for answers.Well, I've lost interest with these ridiculously short messages. If you want to discuss quantum physics, start a thread or PM me.![]()
Serious, you're calling me an idiot? I'd tell you how I feel, but I don't feel like getting banned, so use your imagination. Also, consider yourself on my ignore list for that.It answered the question. I had no idea there was a character maximum for answers.
I'll pass. It would be like discussing mountain climbing with a fish.
Dude, word to the wise: it's against the rules to say you're putting someone on ignore. It's more productive to move on and not engage.Serious, you're calling me an idiot? I'd tell you how I feel, but I don't feel like getting banned, so use your imagination. Also, consider yourself on my ignore list for that.
No. I just don't think you have the education in that topic and seem unwilling to learn about it. You very well might be highly intelligent and knowledgeable in many subjects. I know my own knowledge and education is woefully lacking in many areas.Serious, you're calling me an idiot? I'd tell you how I feel, but I don't feel like getting banned, so use your imagination. Also, consider yourself on my ignore list for that.
You're pulling my leg... right?Dude, word to the wise: it's against the rules to say you're putting someone on ignore. It's more productive to move on and not engage.
No. I'm trying the help you here. I might not agree with you but I do appreciate your discussion. But, things don't need to get personal. It's just text in a screen. It's ok to disengage.You're pulling my leg... right?![]()
If we were to get an Indiana Jones movie without Indiana Jones, I'd much rather it be about Short Round.
Bloodless human corpses chilled to near freezing have been reanimated up to two hours after clinical death.You and I cannot resurrect the dead.
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!Bloodless human corpses chilled to near freezing have been reanimated up to two hours after clinical death.
I met a genetics and genomics writer named Razib Khan earlier this year.Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!
What was the thread about again?
I pulled up the article and noted, "He wouldn’t reveal how many people had survived as a result." How do we know anyone survived this if he won't say? Interesting. Regardless, this does not qualify as resurrecting the dead as the patient is only clinically dead. This is resuscitation, not resurrection. Resuscitation is where the human body is clinically dead, but still viable, still salvageable. Resurrection is where the body is completely dead and beginning to break down, say someone who has been dead for several days or a week. Do you understand the difference between resuscitation and resurrection?Bloodless human corpses chilled to near freezing have been reanimated up to two hours after clinical death.
I think one could easily do an adventure serial type film without it being Indiana Jones.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.