3,000 - 4,000 or 10,000, what difference does it make?
It makes a difference of six to seven thousand years.
I made a point in the beginning that my years could be off for that but what does it matter? 3,000 years as opposed to 100 years for space faring and give or take 8 hours of Warp capability?
Keep in mind that ENT itself established that being in space a long time doesn't automatically lead to a concommitant level of technological advancement. The Vulcans took hundreds of years to go from low-level warp to high-level warp. Further, ENT also made it clear in "The Forge" that it took Vulcans hundreds of years to recover from their nuclear war and re-establish themselves as an interstellar power. So the Vulcans' space presence in the Regular verse wasn't continuous and linear; ergo it needn't have been for the MirrorVulcans.
As far as the MU Vulcans, everything that we've seen on-screen indicates to me that they are very similar to our Vulcans in their development.
Except that we've seen
nothing of MirrorVulcan development. Our earliest canonical information available on the MirrorVulcans is that in 2063, they landed a ship that was visual identical to the
T'Plana-Hath in the Regular verse. That's it.
I think it certainly is fair to say that the entire species (aside from a scattered few) has shown a propensity toward evil and violence
How's that? We've only ever
seen a scattered few Mirror Humans in the Imperial Starfleet; you might as well argue that all Germans are barbarous and evil and genocidal after following a few companies of Nazi SS troops around during World War II. And heck, the Humans in DS9's Mirror Universe episodes seemed damn near heroic at times.
The analogies of Nazi-ism and the Uganda government under Idi Amin don't hold because Nazi-ism wasn't ever global (although it tried to be) and was opposed by an overwhelming majority of the planet nor was the Amin rule.
And we have absolutely no information available on how the Terran Empire secured its hold on planetary and interstellar power, nor do we have any information on how most Humans feel about the Empire. It's entirely possible that most people
don't support the Empire but that it's simply too powerful for them to overthrow. Maybe there's a Resistence movement. Maybe that was what Mirorr Eart's Third World War was about -- liberal democracy opposing Imperial tyranny but losing and being conquered.
You're making a hell of a lot of assumptions on the basis of extremely dubious evidence.
What they have in common, though, was an overwhelming consent of the people to take control. Nazi-ism succeeded through the democratic process and Amin succeeded with the support of the people through a military coup.
I agree with this and it proves my point that I just made. My theory when it comes to governments, good and bad, is that they assume and succeed with the consent and will of the people or they are destined to failure. It would appear, as you point out, that the Fascist style of Government is far more global and expansive which leads me to believe that enough people signed up for it. So yes, you can blame the majority of the German population.
So all Germans are evil?
This is obviously historically simplistic as there were historical circumstances that led to Hitler and the Nazi Party's rise
Incredibly so. Not the least of which is the fact that Hitler would never have been able to gain as much power as he had were it not for backroom dealings with the Social Democrats, the age and personality of the German President (and his subsequent death), and the fact that Hitler called multiple elections several times in order to bloster his parliamentary standing when a reasonable head of state would have opposed him. To say nothing of the Reichstag Fire. Hitler
subverted parliamentary democracy, and as such, the culpability of the German people as a whole is not as clear-cut as you're making it seem. To say nothing of the fact that it is just plain racist to say that all Germans have any more of a propensity for evil than any other ethnic group.
I have a hard time buying that MU humans who invented Warp that morning were able to reverse engineer that single ship and take over the entire Vulcan race. There is the issue of time here. What? The Vulcan High Command didn't notice that one of its ships was missing and send other ships to investigate? ..which brings me right back to where I was before. I am willing to accept that maybe these Vulcans were more pacifistic than our Vulcans. That being said, wouldn't it be even more incumbent upon them to use more caution when making contact to avoid any potential conflict or confrontation?
That's
your conception of the logical approach. A Vulcan may just as well argue that contact will occur in one form or another and that it is better to approach with open arms and an attitude of trust, for a race that can be trusted will return it, and a race that cannot be trusted will be found out as such immediately instead of fooling them.
Wouldn't it seem the wiser plan to have several ships arrive at Earth to contain any possible situations that may develop?
If the Mirror Universe
T'Plana-Hath is like the regularverse one, they probably weren't expecting to make first contact when they arrived in the Sol system and did so only in response to the Chocrane experiment.
Not really getting this. There is no indication that Romulan involvement/manipulation was anything but a recent phenomena during the ENT era.
Actually, ENT made it clear that the Vulcan government had adopted a semi-xenophobic and hostile attitude towards aliens for at least the last century, including the Andorian conflict and the patronizing attitudes towards Earth. If anything, that implies to me that the Romulans had been manipulating Vulcan for a while.
Again, I'm back to what I said about the reverse engineering of one ship and then using that technology to take over an entire species. I don't think that the Vulcans, despite how pacifistic they may have been would have just ignored the missing ship.
What makes you think it would have happened so quickly? It could well have taken decades for the Terran Empire to conquer Vulcan.
Allow me to clear this up a little then. History has shown an almost immediate cultural, technological and societal advancement during periods of enlightenment
Really? So how come Adolf Hitler came after Mill and Russeau and Locke?
You might want to tell that to Robert Mugabe and Perves Musharaff. Or George W. Bush, for that matter.
My point is that if human beings were becoming more enlightened (as a whole because that's how it works) in the early to mid 21st Century, it is highly unlikely that all of humanity would have fallen off of the wagon so completely by 2063.
Germany was the birthplace of the Enlightenment. It was the nation of Kant. It was where Martin Luther started the Protestant Revolution. It was the home of philosophy.
Didn't stop it from becoming the literal definition of a barbarous state in the 20th Century.
I'm suggesting that humanity of our Universe is completely different than humanity in the MU and had been for quite some time preceding 2063 or the Bell Riots of the early 21st Century.
The history and political culture, sure. The fundamental nature? Not so much. The Terran Empire is just humanity if the political culture reflects humanity's darkest impulses instead of its best.
This being said, and accepting the concept that the MU Vulcans were very similar to our Vulcans,
Which I do not.
it would seem logical that the Vulcans would have been smart enough to not land that lone ship in Montana to make first contact.
Maybe that captain didn't know a lot about Earth history? Maybe they hadn't been following Earth developments as much as you're presuming? Maybe he was an idealist who believed in giving peace a chance? Maybe this, maybe that. There are many, many different possible scenerios you aren't considering.