Because someone (not you) apparently skipped most the thread and missed that it had already been explained.
Because your post repeated what I had already said.
Is there a rule stating that you can’t repeat what someone else has said?
Because someone (not you) apparently skipped most the thread and missed that it had already been explained.
Because your post repeated what I had already said.
Just seems redundant when the person already got it and the conversation had ended weeks ago.
I know there's a rule against restarting a thread that has been dormant for more than a year or two, but I'm unaware of any prohibition on chiming in on one that's a few weeks old. In any case, I just don't see why anyone would care.And restarting a conversation is verboten?
I don't think there's anything concrete that the Endeavour was at Wolf 359. The whole thing with the missing ship could just be them rounding up 39 to 40. Endeavour could have fought them In "Descent" or some other time we never saw. I like this missing ship idea as an "in-universe" conspiracy theory though, along with two Melbournes
JANEWAY: I've been looking through the personal log entries of all the Starfleet Captains who encountered the Borg. I've gone over every engagement, from the moment Q flung the Enterprise into the path of that first Cube to the massacre at Wolf 359. Every battle, every skirmish. anything that might give me an insight into the mind of the Collective.
CHAKOTAY: And?
JANEWAY: In the words of Jean-Luc Picard. 'In their Collective state,the Borg are utterly without mercy, driven by one will alone: the will to conquer. They are beyond redemption, beyond reason.' And then there's Captain Amasov of the Endeavour. 'It is my opinion that the Borg are as close to pure evil as any race we've ever encountered.'
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.