• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers All Things STAR WARS - News, Speculation & Spoilers Thread

Once again, I must warn against the dangers of rational clear-headed thinking in a discussion about Star Wars.
i-forgot-for-a-moment-billy-mcbride.gif
 
Is she actually the one personally doing the hiring though? I had assumed that was usually going to be the lower level people.

You think deciding who to hire to direct movies with budgets in the hundreds of millions of dollars is a "lower level" matter? Are you effing kidding us? Please, save yourself some face, and claim you were kidding. :wtf:
 
I have no idea how the business side of any of this works. I had thought someone like her would just set aside so much money for some many movies or shows or whatever, and then the more specific stuff would go to the other producers or whoever were working on those individual projects.
From some of the other comments it sounds like she is a bit more directly involved in the individual projects than I thought.
One comparison I was just thinking about that I do find interesting, is that Star Wars has a whole series of record breaking, $1,000,000,000+ movies, and record breaking streaming series, and she's a massive failure and the worst thing to happen to the franchise and needs to be fire, but Kevin Feige over at Marvel has had a whole string of legitimate failures, and the only reaction is that people hope he can turn things around and that the next movies will be more successful. It's really kind of odd.
 
One comparison I was just thinking about that I do find interesting, is that Star Wars has a whole series of record breaking, $1,000,000,000+ movies, and record breaking streaming series, and she's a massive failure and the worst thing to happen to the franchise and needs to be fire, but Kevin Feige over at Marvel has had a whole string of legitimate failures, and the only reaction is that people hope he can turn things around and that the next movies will be more successful. It's really kind of odd.
Star Wars as a fandom seems to need a villain.

Feige some how escapes the same level of scrutiny. Odd is putting it mildly.
 
I'm amazed that we've been getting Star Wars comics published by Marvel for 9 years, and we haven't gotten a Marvel Univers/Star Wars crossover. It seems like a total no brain, I mean who wouldn't want to see Darth Vader fighting the Avengers, or Luke Skywalker vs Doctor Doom.
 
This is my attitude as well, and one of the reasons I regularly revisit form posts elsewhere on how poorly Lucas was treated by the fandom. Star Wars was thought to be dead in some circles, much the way it is now.

Kennedy has a mixed record. So does Lucas. Lucas doesn't like Empire, and we were given Ewoks in response to one of the darkest chapters in Star Wars in Empire at the time. Then we got Ewok films and a cartoon. Ewoks were long despised by fans, and considered to be how "kiddie" Star Wars had become, vs. more dark installments like Star Wars and Empire, were gouts of flame and sparks popped off of people as they were shot or tortured.

I'd say Kennedy is doing about as well as Lucas.

The major difference is that the Disney era's productions (including all of the bad) are all supposed to be an official part of the in-universe narrative, a contrast to the Lucas years, where the Ewoks & Droids cartoons and the Holiday Special were never considered canon, so being failed or misguided productions did not damage the reputation / perception of the OT in the way so much of Disney/LFL's SW output is an official part of the in-universe narrative, weakening the overall effect (or perception) of this era of productions.
 
The major difference is that the Disney era's productions (including all of the bad) are all supposed to be an official part of the in-universe narrative, a contrast to the Lucas years, where the Ewoks & Droids cartoons and the Holiday Special were never considered canon, so being failed or misguided productions did not damage the reputation / perception of the OT in the way so much of Disney/LFL's SW output is an official part of the in-universe narrative, weakening the overall effect (or perception) of this era of productions.
I'll take your word for it.

The PT already did that for me.
 
I doubt that a story like that would be approved by Lucasfilm.
Ah, that's a good point, I didn't think about Lucasfilm. I just figured with all of the crazy comic crossovers we've been getting the last few years, that would fit right in with the rest of them. I mean hell, Star Trek even got in on the action with Planet of the Apes, Green Lanter, Legion of Superherioes, Doctor Who, and Transformers. But I guess Lucasfilm does tend to be a bit more protective of their property than a lot of the other companies are.
The major difference is that the Disney era's productions (including all of the bad) are all supposed to be an official part of the in-universe narrative, a contrast to the Lucas years, where the Ewoks & Droids cartoons and the Holiday Special were never considered canon, so being failed or misguided productions did not damage the reputation / perception of the OT in the way so much of Disney/LFL's SW output is an official part of the in-universe narrative, weakening the overall effect (or perception) of this era of productions.
Disney era Lucasfilm has done a few non-canon productions, like the LEGO specials, and Visions, so they're not totally against releasing some intentionally non-canon stuff.
 
The LEGO stuff seems to weirdly operate in a canon grey-zone. The general philosophy seems to be that they treat them as if they're LEGO adaptations of canon Star Wars stories, that just so happen to not actually exist . . . but they *could* (even 'Visions' takes a very similar approach.) Even at it's wackiest they still keep true to the spirit of Star Wars, all the while having fun with it. Indeed, for the 'Freemaker' show, they even went so far to design the main characters as actual people in Star Wars, and reverse engineered the mini-fig designs from there.

So yeah; while I could see Star Wars characters and the like to show up in other LEGO movies/specials with an emphasis on franchise cross-overs (as they already have done), I don't think that's a two-way street so far as LF is concerned.
 
Has Star Wars ever crossed over with another franchise? I mean full on crossovers, not just silly cameos. The closes thing I can think of right now is the Star Wars episode of The Muppet Show, which had 3PO, R2, Chewie and Mark Hamill as both himself and Luke. I'm not counting the Family Guy episodes, since they were Family Guy adaptations of The Original Trilogy, not crossovers with the two casts interacting.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top