I don't think I know enough to say it has anything written on it.
I need way more data points than a brief description.
A "Star Trek workplace comedy", tells me a lot about how interested conceptually I am in the proposed product.
I don't think I know enough to say it has anything written on it.
I need way more data points than a brief description.
More power to you. Not enough for me.A "Star Trek workplace comedy", tells me a lot about how interested conceptually I am in the proposed product.
I like both things. There has always been a touch of work place comedy in Trek. Newsome’ s use of DS9 as an inspiration rings true for me. It was dark at times, but no stranger to hijinksA "Star Trek workplace comedy", tells me a lot about how interested conceptually I am in the proposed product.
Honestly, this has train wreck written all over it.
So, you’ve seen it?This is a generic sitcom stamped with the Star Trek brand.![]()
So, you’ve seen it?
Honestly, this has train wreck written all over it.
If Lower Decks can be seen as comedic version of TNG, then I'd be very happy if this turns out to be a comedic version of DS9.
Most stories in Trek are in common settings and beats with Trek stamped on them. It’s what is done with those settings and beats that makes them Star Trek.A sitcom taking place in a resort.
Minus the Star Trek brand, it could be the framework for ANY sitcom.
Exactly. Couldn't agree more.No, it doesn’t. It doesn’t have anything written all over it because none of it is written. I imagine people said the same thing when they heard a 2 sentence summary of DS9 before it was made. Wait and see.
Isn't that called the forgotten years or something?
Section 31 is in that time period. Who knows might lead to a Garrett led series.Personally, I would much rather watch Legacy, a Shaw spinoff, or a series that takes place in the time between Old Trek movies and TNG. Isn't that called the forgotten years or something?
I’ve been mostly pleased with the output. Picard 3 being the only total disappointment.All I know is that I'm still waiting for the premium Trek content Paramount+ promised nearly a decade ago.
Section 31 is in that time period. Who knows might lead to a Garrett led series.
Depends on reaction to the SEC31 film and the character. Also what will be on in three years. Might be an opportunity after SNW wraps. Or maybe none at all. Just spit balling.With three live action shows going, I imagine this will never see the light of day.
We could end up with no Trek at allDepends on reaction to the SEC31 film and the character. Also what will be on in three years. Might be an opportunity after SNW wraps. Or maybe none at all. Just spit balling.
Been there done that. Twice. I would not like it, but I’d live.We could end up with no Trek at all
That'll be nice.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.