• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Final Frontier isn’t great but it’s not the sin against god and man people make it out to be.

It’s got easily the best Kirk, Spock and McCoy material since TOS and “Why does God need a starship?” Is an all time line that only Captain Kirk would ask.

Better than TMP…I wouldn’t agree with that. But better than Generations, Into Darkness, Trek ‘09, Insurrection and Nemesis. Yeah, I’d be down with that.
 
Final Frontier isn’t great but it’s not the sin against god and man people make it out to be.

It’s got easily the best Kirk, Spock and McCoy material since TOS and “Why does God need a starship?” Is an all time line that only Captain Kirk would ask.
Kirk’s “I need my pain” speech is classic too.

I think TMP is the worst Star Trek movie of all time. I’d watch TFF on a continuous loop for days before sitting through TMP again.

:lol:
 
TMP is a skid mark on the underwear of Star Trek.
Interesting bit of trivia:

Adjusting for inflation, The Motion Picture is still the second most successful Star Trek movie in the entire franchise, just slightly behind (2009), in terms of overall gross and ticket sales.
Kirk’s “I need my pain” speech is classic too.

I think TMP is the worst Star Trek movie of all time. I’d watch TFF on a continuous loop for days before sitting through TMP again.

:lol:
On the other hand, a LOT of distinctive elements of the TOS movies and the overall franchise comes out of The Motion Picture.

For example:
  • Jerry Goldsmith's theme.
  • For the most part, it solidifies the basic aesthetics of the Star Trek universe, updating the TOS designs instead of taking them back to square one and not overly rethinking the entire dynamic of what the ships looked like and how the crew functions (e.g., the Klingons would retain this appearance for almost the next 40 years).
  • Kirk beginning to realize his place is with the Enterprise, and how unhappy he is when he's not in that chair.
  • Spock's rejection of the Kohlinar is symbolic, and by the end of the movie I think he realizes that there's value in a "third way." That logic is "the beginning of wisdom," but the connections and affection he gets from the Enterprise "family" is something worthwhile.
I also think the story for The Motion Picture fits with the other movies thematically. At the end of the day, The Motion Picture depicts the Enterprise crew as a dysfunctional family that's been separated, coming back together, confronting things left unsaid, while trying to solve this problem.

And part of the movie is the idea of how can people (i.e., Kirk, Spock, etc.) who can't be honest with themselves about their wants and desires expect to talk to something truly alien about what it wants and needs?
 
Last edited:
Interesting bit of trivia:

Adjusting for inflation, The Motion Picture is still the second most successful Star Trek movie in the entire franchise, just slightly behind (2009), in terms of overall gross and ticket sales.

On the other hand, a LOT of distinctive elements of the TOS movies and the overall franchise comes out of The Motion Picture.

For example:
  • Jerry Goldsmith's theme.
  • For the most part, it solidifies the basic aesthetics of the Star Trek universe, updating the TOS designs instead of taking them back to square one and not overly rethinking the entire dynamic of what the ships looked like and how the crew functions (e.g., the Klingons would retain this appearance for almost the next 40 years).
  • Kirk beginning to realize his place is with the Enterprise, and how unhappy he is when he's not in that chair.
  • Spock's rejection of the Kohlinar is symbolic, and by the end of the movie I think he realizes that there's value in a "third way." That logic is "the beginning of wisdom," but the connections and affection he gets from the Enterprise "family" is something worthwhile.
I also think the story for The Motion Picture fits with the other movies thematically. At the end of the day, The Motion Picture depicts the Enterprise crew as a dysfunctional family that's been separated, coming back together, confronting things left unsaid, while trying to solve this problem.

And part of the movie is the idea of how can people (i.e., Kirk, Spock, etc.) who can't be honest with themselves about their wants and desires expect to talk to something truly alien about what it wants and needs?
Sure the box office did well with a decade of pent up anticipation. It also has a dismal 42% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes.

Bottom line, for me personally, the movie was boring as fuck.

YMMV.

:techman:
 
Both TOS and DSC/SNW of the 2250s are visual canon. Works for me. "The Cage" happened, and the DSC and SNW adventures of Pike happen four or five years afterwards and none erase the other from the continuity. The Enterprise looks like it does in 2254 and then in 2259 and finally in 2266.

Nothing's been overwritten, visually or verbally.
That does require the Enterprise to have been refit back and forth a couple of times. I don’t actually have a problem with that, though many undoubtedly will.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top