Not in Star Trek. Happens all the time.Coincidentally, a video was recently released talking about how it's actually quite difficult to fall into a black hole.
Not in Star Trek. Happens all the time.Coincidentally, a video was recently released talking about how it's actually quite difficult to fall into a black hole.
Interesting how Discovery's run, beginning to end, was exactly 30 years after TNG's, down to the month (which is saying something since Sept-May isn't the norm anymore).
I was actually half joking but yeah ENT:TATV is certainly the worst finale of any series, not just Star Trek franchise.You’re clearly joking. No one in their right mind would suggest anything is as bad or worse as “These Are the Voyages”. Even if Disco’s finale bored me, it didn’t commit the deadly sins that the finale of Enterprise had.
Anyway, as far as finales go…
TNG - 5/5
DS9 - 4.5/5
PIC - 3.5/5
DIS - 3/5
VOY - 2/5
ENT - 1/5
I can theoretically see going a step further - finding out that you're a creation of an ancient alien species is one thing, finding out how they did it is another. But the answer wasn't interesting (another set of even "ancient-er" aliens created it) and it can create life and new worlds, but it's not clear to what end other than to create weird science experiments. It is the secret to life, but even in the 24th century the Founders were growing soldiers out of nothing, so it's not clear what you would use it to do. It's somehow a little more mundane now that it's just a piece of technology.While the writers may have tried to frame it that way in the season, Discovery doesn't exist in a vacuum.
So as much as Discovery's writers might not like it, we have to look at the framing of things as they would exist in the setting itself. And when looked at through the greater lens of Star Trek history, it completely re-contextualizes everything in the season so you end up with stuff like this that should be "deep" just coming off as silly.
That's what I mean - it's perfectly viable as a weapon. What use does it have otherwise though? Even by TOS era, we know they can terraform planets. Maybe they can do it faster, but it hardly seems life changing.As Burnham said, you could create an entire army out of nothing. Or you could basically play God and take a lifeless planet and create life shaped in any way you desire.
That's what I mean - it's perfectly viable as a weapon. What use does it have otherwise though? Even by TOS era, we know they can terraform planets. Maybe they can do it faster, but it hardly seems life changing.
I was actually half joking but yeah ENT:TATV is certainly the worst finale of any series, not just Star Trek franchise.
The only thing comparatively I'd say remotely bad are the two(!!) Dexter finales. Dexter fans got cucked twice!![]()
So does flying out of one.Not in Star Trek. Happens all the time.
The Federation could do that in the 24th CenturyIt's no the same as terraforming. With terraforming, you can bring life from another planet to a new planet. With this you can create whatever life you want in whatever form you want.
DIS has had issues over the last three seasons juggling characters. They keep introducing new characters to the setting, but in the process the older ones progressively lose focus.
5. Daniels as a revelation is also something that feels like the worst of Picard Season 3's, "Hey remember X?" It doesn't really inform or change the character, IMHO.
But they're in a post scarcity world and it seems like the only suffering that exists is because of their adherence to the Prime Directive and their unwillingness to help pre-war civilizations and non-Federation worlds. Clearly over population isn't an issue either if two people can have a private cabin in the woods, so it's not like they are running out of worlds to support life... so what possible use would someone have for creating worlds out of thin air?It's no the same as terraforming. With terraforming, you can bring life from another planet to a new planet. With this you can create whatever life you want in whatever form you want.
Because we know in an aborted future the Breen were able to gain control of the technology and use it to destroy the Federation. And they didn't finish the tests or anything.
That was back when it was supposed to be an anthology. They should have changed focus when it was going to be ongoingGo back and read the first media releases: the series was always about the rise -- and fall from grace, and eventual redemption -- of a female First Officer in Starfleet. I think they stuck to that pretty well.
The anthology concept was nixed very early on, about as early as Fuller pitching it. By the time they were shooting the series they already knew it would be an ongoing show.That was back when it was supposed to be an anthology. They should have changed focus when it was going to be ongoing
It wouldn't have made a difference. If it wasn't that, it would've been something else. At least with the more obstinate.In retrospect, they should have just titled the show Star Trek: Michael Burnham, just to make it explicit to fans that keep griping over how she’s focused.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.