I feel like the mystery woman found a way to use the perception filter malarkey to make people run from her so they didn't realize it was her. It might have blown the gaff if someone recognized her. Her own person Watcher.
That's because he doesn't know either. And there's logically nothing she could've said to the Mom that would've made her run away like that. At most, she would've told Ruby what she said and asked her to explain it. The same with UNIT, a group of trained professionals. Even if they bought into whatever she said, they'd question Ruby.RTD says we will never know what the old lady was saying
Hard disagree. The mere absence of The Doctor isn't why such an episode doesn't work, rather it's the writing itself. "Turn Left" and "Blink" are fantastically written while "Love & Monsters" is decidedly not.Showrunners/writers really need to stop doing 'Doctor Lite' episodes because they almost never work.
Yes, I know that those types of episodes get made for real-world production reasons, but they're still not very good episodes more often than not.
RTD says we will never know what the old lady was saying
https://twitter.com/AMadmanNotABox/status/1794166834587172996
If that was my only issue with the episode, I could overlook it. But, it's not.I don't have an issue with not knowing what she said. In fact, that's the one mystery I don't want an answer for.
I'm just stuck on the point of the episode. I loved eerie atmosphere of the first half and people losing their shit after talking to her. Even the deeply unsettling nature of both Carla and Kate reacting the way they do was fantastic.
But the combination of the lack of effort of making Ruby look older, the very vague nature of Gwilliam, and the reveal that no one remembered this alternate future made the second half of the episode land very flat for me.
I'm right there with you. Not knowing what the old woman said would be a much more impactful brain teaser if the script for the rest of the episode made any kind of sense. As it is, it's just one more bit of messiness in a messy episode, and I just don't care what she said.I don't have an issue with not knowing what she said. In fact, that's the one mystery I don't want an answer for.
I'm just stuck on the point of the episode. I loved eerie atmosphere of the first half and people losing their shit after talking to her. Even the deeply unsettling nature of both Carla and Kate reacting the way they do was fantastic.
But the combination of the lack of effort of making Ruby look older, the very vague nature of Gwilliam, and the reveal that no one remembered this alternate future made the second half of the episode land very flat for me.
In the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy, they have that machine which shows you the entire universe, and then explains to you how irrelevant you are in comparison to infinite space and infinite life, until your ego pops like a grape.
Ruby was the only person that mattered, and everyone else who thought that they were alive, were fake, and only there to temporarily support Ruby come to a bog standard unamazing epiphany that grave bothering is wrong, so every time she rang her mum who was far away Mrs Sunday was partially drawn back into existence as a voice on the phone, and not a real person any where that was real, with a face or feet.
I think that the universe only extended 73 yards from Ruby. Anything beyond that was an optical illusion, or back story that didn't actually have to physically play out to be added to the worldstory.
I think its just a matter of fact that, these days, 40 year olds do look younger in their 40's than they used to. The age limit has moved up after all, and it makes sense that younger people will look young for longer periods of time as it goes on. So really, a non-existant irk to have.Putting big glasses and a wig on a 20 year old doesn't make them look like a 40 year old.
If Blink and Turn Left didn't exist, I'd agree. However, they do exist. And the former is consistently ranked as one of the show's best, if not the best ever.Showrunners/writers really need to stop doing 'Doctor Lite' episodes because they almost never work.
"Don't you think she looks tired?'And what does she say that makes Kate Lethbridge-Stewart look at her with such disdain as she leaves?
Honestly, the thing that took me out of the age makeup was that either Ruby is very committed to current fashion trends, or she really does have a scar on her eyebrow.
However, the star - who plays loan shark's daughter Kelly Neelan in the ITV soap - has told fans it's just a scar.
In fact, she's been asked about it so many times, her social media profile now includes the words: "Before you ask - it’s a scar."
Speaking to The Sun the actress, 17 next month, said viewers' assumption she had styled it that way irritated her family.
She said: "My dad gets annoyed with online comments like that! When I was 2 or 3, I have pictures looking like a thug.
Hard disagree. The mere absence of The Doctor isn't why such an episode doesn't work, rather it's the writing itself. "Turn Left" and "Blink" are fantastically written while "Love & Monsters" is decidedly not.
If Blink and Turn Left didn't exist, I'd agree. However, they do exist. And the former is consistently ranked as one of the show's best, if not the best ever.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.