• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Boom grade and discussion thread

How do you rate Boom?


  • Total voters
    49
According to the poll cited by GG, 66% of them are not, yet almost every Republican in elected office or conservative media is. How do these Republicans keep winning primaries with a position opposed by 66% of Republicans? Why do the conservative media cater to the 34% over the 66%?
Because voter suppression and gerrymandering are still a thing in the USA
 
Because voter suppression and gerrymandering are still a thing in the USA
Gerrymandering may give an advantage to Republicans when they make a lot of 55% Republican districts and a few 90% Democratic districts, but I don’t see how it allows candidates to win Republican primaries in almost every Republican district with the support of only 34% of Republicans.
 
Sympathetic, but clearly wrong in their beliefs. It’s not exactly validating to religious faith. When the Doctor says he needs faith, he’s talking about faith in special people like your dad, not religious faith.

And that’s why he was super friendly with the space pope way back when…
Like I said, the show *always* stops just short of having the Doctor make even intimations that way. Here he is angry at blind faith, but quite fond of all the other kinds on display — even if he doesn’t share them.
The Doctors faith is often in people (see The Curse Of Fenric with the volume up…) but the show and the character never really cross the line into full on frothing Dawkins atheism for the most part. It also never criticises faith groups directly.
 
Which makes this episode even more disappointingly Blah.

Certainly makes *not* using the opportunity to do something a little clever, and give us a ‘future’ based companion, seem… a missed opportunity.
Mind you, not sure I would trust RTD to have any nuance about an Indian Woman from the Future who is a Soldier and an Anglican.
 
I thought the episode was decent, but didn't quite stick the landing.

Yup. Just a bit rushed. Wonky characterisation for the Doctor and a very quick ‘and then they sodded off and left the survivors to it’ which seems all the more hollow these days, and with these emotional stakes.
 
Gerrymandering may give an advantage to Republicans when they make a lot of 55% Republican districts and a few 90% Democratic districts, but I don’t see how it allows candidates to win Republican primaries in almost every Republican district with the support of only 34% of Republicans.

Doctor Who is made in Britain so America's position on gay rights is irrelevant.
 

Edit edit: And originally Devils Chord was going to be pre-finale, episode six of eight.
Guess they wanted to get all the shite at the beginning and hope the next bit could redeem the series. Which it just might.

Where did you hear that because in the InVision commentary RTD explicitly says that it was episode 2.
 
I was wondering if they were playing games with CG, but that set really is enormous.

I imagine it’s housed in a very tiny building.
 
This another 9 for me.
It gave us a bit more seriousness from the Doctor and Ruby, which was kinda nice after being so goofy for so much of the last couple episode. Ncuti Gatwa and Millie Gibson did a great job in it too.
It definitely had an interesting take on a future war controlled by a corporation, and how that kind of thing can go very wrong.
Was this filmed on a Volume or was the background just CGI?
 
Yet another "Twist", and not even at the end :guffaw:

A surprisingly moving episode, despite the quick resolution. I wonder if we'll eventually see the Doctor's son or daughter, what with the father references. Even Susan herself would be very welcome, twist or not.
 
This another 9 for me.
It gave us a bit more seriousness from the Doctor and Ruby, which was kinda nice after being so goofy for so much of the last couple episode. Ncuti Gatwa and Millie Gibson did a great job in it too.
It definitely had an interesting take on a future war controlled by a corporation, and how that kind of thing can go very wrong.
Was this filmed on a Volume or was the background just CGI?
Volume.
 
What is it that Volume does that old fashioned green screening can’t do?


The volume lets the actors interact with an actual background rather than nothing with a green screen

The volume also allows movies to change the day and time as they see fit.

lqZRgD9.jpg
 
What is it that Volume does that old fashioned green screening can’t do?
In addition to what others have said, it allows realistic lighting. As they project the actual environment on the actors, it lights them more realistically than trying to recreate the environments lighting with various artificial techniques
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top