I don't see how the Progenitors from "The Chase" is too wild an idea. These beings are shown as just really, really advanced and that they seeded worlds with genetic designs. Simply put, not gods... just advanced. Like the Prophets... Bajorans view them as gods, but they aren't. They are simply more powerful than corporeal beings. (And they CAN be killed by corporeals with chroniton beams.)
Just like the Q... "DEATH WISH" established that they simply have ultra sophisticated technology.
In short, STAR TREK remembers one of Clarke's laws: any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic.
Q, Apollo, Trelane... and the Progenitors.
I think for me, and like I said before this is just my preference and admittedly maybe this is just me being picky, since I don't begrudge anyone that likes it, finds it interesting, or thinks it's a good addition (and the reason I suggested some ways you could make connections to other aspects of the
Star Trek universe is I can see how writers thought it could be a good story idea to play with), but the overall idea of ancient astronauts being responsible for humanity's origin is something that tends to take me out of the story because I find it an aspect that distances the
Star Trek universe from "our" world.
It hits me in the same way others have justified
Discovery and
Strange New Worlds retconning the Eugenics Wars, Khan's origin, and other aspects of TOS to make it more "believable" for our timeline and being "aspirational" with our history. That, for some people, if you're going to say that Trek having Eugenic Wars in the 1990s, late 20th-century genetic supermen, Gorn in rubber suits, and starships in the 2200s with knobs and dials takes them out because it seems too ridiculous, well the parts of Trek where Earth "history" has space-faring dinosaurs and ancient astronauts responsible for our existence takes me out in the same way because it doesn't seem believable. That's just my perspective.
So...seeding life takes away human accomplishment...how?
And if that's the objection why not object to "Tattoo" as well?
Again, just a personal opinion, but I think ascribing human existence to some celestial "parentage," whether it be a "Heavenly Father" or ancient astronauts, gets into the realm of a fantasy that takes me out of the story in the same way people (and the current Trek showrunners) think TOS' fictional history about 1990s Eugenics Wars is too much because it doesn't seem grounded with our own history.
And who says I don't have the same objection to "Tattoo" with
Voyager?
I think that episode and a LOT of
Voyager's depiction of Native American history and culture were ridiculous and arguably offensive in ascribing aspects of a real human culture to an alien origin, especially given the show had a Native American consultant feeding them advice whom later turned out to be an absolute fraud.
I would say it could be argued that the Q, and other beings like them, very much ARE "gods" (small-g) in so much as they have some kind of mastery over natural forces, giving them powers far beyond mortal men. They're not like, big-G God, they didn't CREATE the universe, they're just a part of it (or, maybe more accurate, have access to it... i'm not sure the Continuum is actually a part of the universe.)
If there's one tweak I would make to
Voyager's "Death Wish," I would change the presentation of the Q Continuum since I think it makes the Q a little "too" powerful.
The way it's presented is as a place where the Q are bored because they see the universe as a road that they've explored fully, completely, and has no surprises for them to the point of leading to boredom and stagnation. Because, arguably, if you accept the Q as a race that can go anywhere on "the road" and know everything about everything that will ever happen on the road, and have mastery over the material world, that gets really close to omnipotence.
I think it would have been better to say that to them the universe is a road that
never ends. And that people like Quinn are tired of traveling an endless road that leads to just more and more road. To me, that's a more interesting perspective. A "god-like" being who becomes sick of an existence where the endless mysteries isn't enough anymore.