• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How is the holodeck able to recreate, say, Game 7 of a World Series from 1964 with so much accuracy?

hxclespaulplayer

Captain
Captain
considering the technology of the time? Unless the creators of these types of programs actually travel back in time to the events to "film" them? Or anything like that, really. Even if we had a holodeck today, we wouldn't be able to recreate the first soccer match in the 1800's.
 
We would if we had even grainy black and white film though. All you really need is source material that shows body movement and positions of things.

The stadium, pitch, uniforms and player likenesses can all be patched in from other sources when necessary and well, grass is just grass, isn't it ? Authentic looking jerseys and the like can be generated and textured from scratch and mapped onto the body positions from the film. 360° views extrapolated, and, as a last resort, any gaps filled by AI best guesses.



Edit - I first started to think about such stuff when watching the tiny wormhole thing with Voyager able to communicate to a limited degree with Starfleet.

They actually wouldn't have had to use immense amounts of data for full use of holodecks to communicate. Just send a current still photo of the caller and background, and a moving wire frame of their gestures/ talking etc. The holodeck at the other end could extrapolate a full 3D likeness. Not all the data needs to be transmitted.
 
Last edited:
considering the technology of the time? Unless the creators of these types of programs actually travel back in time to the events to "film" them? Or anything like that, really. Even if we had a holodeck today, we wouldn't be able to recreate the first soccer match in the 1800's.

UFP computers are capable of extrapolating things if they have enough data and reference points.
Even the smallest bits of data can give the computer insights into the most likely way to reconstruct things as they would have probably happened.
Obviously some things will probably end up being incorrect, but in a large scale of things, those inaccuracies would be minor and not necessarily relevant...
 
Good.

Of course the earlier ones had their…hiccups.

It helps that we suffer from change blindness and such
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/scie...roblem-with-inattentional-blindness-17339778/

Now, as a lover of horror, I imagine with earlier examples—where you had a few disappearances—as you look at the crowd…the formless, faceless throngs resolve into smiling fans—if their team is winning.

But look away…

Ah, yes…there was that one poor soul who backed into the faceless ones and turned around a bit too fast…the earliest example had something to do with…with…a Veldt was it?
 
Last edited:
considering the technology of the time? Unless the creators of these types of programs actually travel back in time to the events to "film" them? Or anything like that, really. Even if we had a holodeck today, we wouldn't be able to recreate the first soccer match in the 1800's.

You're probably right about a soccer match in 1800's but something from 1964 would have enough reference images and audio and maybe even video for the computer to fill in the blanks and have a reasonable recreation of the events.
 
considering the technology of the time? Unless the creators of these types of programs actually travel back in time to the events to "film" them? Or anything like that, really. Even if we had a holodeck today, we wouldn't be able to recreate the first soccer match in the 1800's.
With 100% accuracy? No, probably not. But, with AI (as others have mentioned) and use of scanning databases to look at ancient records, population reports, and probably composition of the people present, a reasonable facsimile could be created enough for the experience.

We are getting massive amounts of data every year regarding archeological records, tracing migration patterns and DNA analysis. There is the potential to extrapolate from there to create a decent reenactment.
 
There would likely be a bunch of "historical" events that the holodeck could make, but the computer probably wouldn't be able to recreate the people accurately, but instead fill in with 20th/21st century actors who may have taken roles as those people or been AI or otherwise artisticly made to look like said person.
 
There is a question of how you would know if the holodeck was recreating the ‘67 World Series inaccurately. It can match all the historical data available, audio/visual recordings, newspaper reports, personal reminiscences, ticket sales and employment records, but you don’t know what you don’t know.

Maybe as a publicity stunt, a holopublisher could send some sort of probe back in time, or build a specialty super-sized optical telescope positioned however many hundreds of light years away to record an event “live” and compare the 24th century scan to their reproduction, but that seems like an excessive commitment to authenticity for anything short of a forensic examination where there are real consequences to the smallest detail of what’s depicted.

Though, we saw that exact case (both cases, really) in “A Matter of Perspective,” where the holodeck had the blueprints of the science lab, and the physical profiles of all the people involved, and animated them to dramatize each witness’s pre-written statement.
 
Anything that wasn't filmed or otherwise recorded probably wouldn't be precisely recreated. The right fielder scratching his butt, or the catcher spitting tobacco juice. But, since most viewers weren't there, they wouldn't know.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top