• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Indeed, yes. I think Ezri was a better fit despite the late addition. She makes sense in her role as a therapist, vs. Troi who sits there and provides advice or superfluous observations around feelings.

By the way, is that how people think therapists talk? "He seems angry."

They could've just merged the trills and betazoids into one race. Would've spared us all

Knowing Hollywood, some screenwriter probably does think that. I'd actually like a new counselor character, even a telepathic one but not so bland as Troi and not on the bridge
 
It’s a sci-fi trope that every new technology is introduced in the most dystopian Black Mirror way possible, and though that may make for a good yarn, it’s just plain unrealistic. Genetic engineering is coming (I’d engineer cancer and a bad back out of my genome and a few IQ points and a couple of uh ‘inches’ here and there in it), but whether that results in a Khan or not, the ability to do everything else will be here to stay, and I think that’s a net positive.

Yes, deluded or outright bad parents might try to tailor their children to be socially acceptable units as they are fit. I can see whole communities and eventually colonies going this way…New City on a Hill Colony on Ganymede or where have you, but how is that different from religious groups or gated communities today choosing to live their own (fucked up) way?

Khan’s problem was one of megalomania and global conquest, but we already live in a world of widely varied intelligence among the human population without laws curtailing the rights of those more intelligent to learn and contribute to society. If Khan were a physician or an entrepreneur, or an archeologist would anyone care?

But beyond all that, how many different races of intelligent being have we seen on Star Trek — have they all had a Khan and made the same Luddite move? Or are they all just following suit, stunting their societies, because the humans fucked up three centuries ago at the dawn of their genetic understanding? I mean, if at first you don’t succeed, stop everything and make sure no one else tries again either?
 
They can still be entertaining characters who don't state the obvious
Hmmmm...maybe.

But, then, I don't mind bland characters so perhaps I am biased. I know I'm bland :hugegrin:

Or are they all just following suit, stunting their societies, because the humans fucked up three centuries ago at the dawn of their genetic understanding? I mean, if at first you don’t succeed, stop everything and make sure no one else tries again either?
The Federation did try again and it killed an entire crew.

How many must die in the name of so called progress.
 
Trek is in part the bright glorious future to come, one of FTL and friendly aliens and a better society; of exploring for the sake of exploring, not for the profit motive or geopolitical competition….if we’re taking out technology that we know is coming, well, it’s a strain on one’s suspension of disbelief and a limit to the free and wild possibility of the future adventure “just beginning.”
 
Trek is in part the bright glorious future to come, one of FTL and friendly aliens and a better society; of exploring for the sake of exploring, not for the profit motive or geopolitical competition….if we’re taking out technology that we know is coming, well, it’s a strain on one’s suspension of disbelief and a limit to the free and wild possibility of the future adventure “just beginning.”
So, even though we see use of genetic engineering to correct minor problems the wish to keep bettering it must continue even with deaths?

I was aware that Gene's idea of a better future involved people not mourning but this feels a step to far in willingly killing people.

That's not enough for a story for me to watch or read.
Well, we all have our line.
 
The Federation handicaps itself by being too conservative when it comes to technology and science. They could have subspace beaming that allows transporting over light-years, for example, but research was discarded and never picked up again.

Time travel could open up a new frontier of exploration, but it's kept under wraps by the DTI, and later banned entirely in the far future.

And so on..
 
The Federation handicaps itself by being too conservative when it comes to technology and science. They could have subspace beaming that allows transporting over light-years, for example, but research was discarded and never picked up again.

Time travel could open up a new frontier of exploration, but it's kept under wraps by the DTI, and later banned entirely in the far future.

And so on..
ptEdspP.png
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top