There should be a ‘who cares?’ option.
There should be for all polls.
I just don't click on the topic. That's my "who cares".
Yes, they kind of do because of dynamical coherence, or the spin of the galaxy. This is why the axis terminate or at least pass through fixed points which are in synchronised alignment. These changes would take billions of years though, a bit like the shifting continents on Earth.My main question when I think about the layout of the quadrants is: Does the Alpha/Beta Quadrant line revolve around the center of the galaxy as the Solar System does? Do the quadrants change with time?
Yes, if the Earth is a fixed point on the axis by design.In Discovery's 31st century, is Earth still on the border?
YesYou're fine with Earth being in the Beta Quadrant 50% of the time?
By definition, it's exactly 1/4 the size of the galaxy.How big is a quadrant?
Yes
By definition, it's exactly 1/4 the size of the galaxy.
'Kay. Given this thread is about quadrants going by the TNG+ definition, well...For TNG and newer series, yes. But TOS seems to use the term in a different sense as well. Spock, for example, mentions they're entering 'quadrant 904' in the Squire of Gothos.
My main question when I think about the layout of the quadrants is: Does the Alpha/Beta Quadrant line revolve around the center of the galaxy as the Solar System does? Do the quadrants change with time?
In Discovery's 31st century, is Earth still on the border?
I think any star chart has a certain level of arbitrariness about it. Earth is in "Sector 001" because it likely was simply the first sector Humans explored after developing warp drive and a similar rationale may have been behind designating the term "Alpha Quadrant." The Vulcans, Klingons, Romulans, etc., probably have their own star charts that are totally different and use different terms, but the Universal Translator reinterprets them, IMO.
I don't have a problem with the Sol System straddling both the Alpha and Beta Quadrants because an early Human stellar cartographer simply drew the map that way. i do like to believe, however, that most of the Federation is in the Alpha Quadrant, which technically makes it an Alpha Quadrant nation, even if a sizeable chunk of it is in Beta Quadrant.
The border between the alpha and beta quadrants is just some arbitrary line, it's not comparable to a river or a mountain range or something that would make for a more easily defensible border. being on the border would be completely irrelevant and not give earth any strategic value because of its location.Although, you would think that if Earth/Sol was on the border, it would be a pretty strategic position that the Vulcans, Romulans, Andorians, Klingons, etc., would have been fighting over way before humanity ever discovered warp drive.
Yes
By definition, it's exactly 1/4 the size of the galaxy.
The Artificially Declared "Virtual Border-Line" runs directly through the center of mass of our sun "Sol's" slight wobble.I think it's actually that The Sun in on the borderline. It moves around much less than the Earth does.![]()
BIG!How big is a quadrant?
Given how tiny our "Sol" Star System is, it really doesn't matter that much.Having earth right at the border kills the verisimilitude for me. Most maps seems to indicate thats the case though. A good compromise would to simply place Earth a couple hundred light years ( or about 2 months travel) "west" of the border and in the Alpha Quandant. That's where I would put Earth if I was in charge and it came up on screen.
It may be arbitrary, but it seems to be a well-adopted arbitrary decision that every other alien culture seems to buy into. The definition of what distance constitutes a meter, an inch, or a mile were arbitrary choices too, but they only became useful and relevant when the masses adopted and bought into those definitions too. It doesn't make sense that every culture has their own map that defines the contours of regions of space. There would have to be **some** standardization between powers so they would know what each other were talking about and the significance of certain places and lines.I think any star chart has a certain level of arbitrariness about it. Earth is in "Sector 001" because it likely was simply the first sector Humans explored after developing warp drive and a similar rationale may have been behind designating the term "Alpha Quadrant." The Vulcans, Klingons, Romulans, etc., probably have their own star charts that are totally different and use different terms, but the Universal Translator reinterprets them, IMO.
Except Earth is portrayed as within the core of Federation worlds. For the sake of argument, lets go with the idea that the line may of have been drawn for reasons beyond the idea of human arrogance to put themselves into an important position. What possible reason might justify the Sol System being that important?The border between the alpha and beta quadrants is just some arbitrary line, it's not comparable to a river or a mountain range or something that would make for a more easily defensible border. being on the border would be completely irrelevant and not give earth any strategic value because of its location.
Having earth right at the border kills the verisimilitude for me. Most maps seems to indicate thats the case though. A good compromise would to simply place Earth a couple hundred light years ( or about 2 months travel) "west" of the border and in the Alpha Quandant. That's where I would put Earth if I was in charge and it came up on screen.
Wow thanks.The Artificially Declared "Virtual Border-Line" runs directly through the center of mass of our sun "Sol's" slight wobble.
So half of our Sun will always be in the Alpha Quadrant, the other half will always be in the Beta Quadrant.
As for our Planets, it really depends on where we are in the oribt around our Sun.
BIG!
Quadrants are really only useful if you think of a map in 2D.![]()
In 3D space, you need to think of our Galactic Map as "Octants" or ⅛th of a larger cube.![]()
![]()
The Actual size of our Milky Way Galaxy is FAR larger than you think once you factor the actual size of all the major structures of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Thin Disk, Thick Disk, Galactic Halo
Remember, once you get outside of the Thin Disk section, the Density of Star Systems dramatically decrease the further you get, especially once you hit the Galactic Halo area, there will be even less Star Systems clustered together as densely packed as in the Thin Disk.
The Galactic Bulge should be incredibly dense and crazy packed / filled with Star Systems in that roughly spheroid volume of space around our SMBH Sagittarius A*
![]()
This is how a real 3D StarMap would look like and should look like:
There's a "Virtual" Flat Reference plane for the center Z=0 that slices through the center of the Thin Disk. All Star System positions are relative to that "Virtual Flat Reference Plane".
The local 'In-Galaxy' "Virtual Reference Plane" is seperate from any "Virtual Reference Plane" once you span out to the scale of comparing nearby Galaxies.![]()
That would have to be a seperate "Virtual Reference Plane" in and of itself.
Given how tiny our "Sol" Star System is, it really doesn't matter that much.
![]()
If you really look at how our Star System moves around our SMBH, it's FAR more complicated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.