The missing texture is just too odd, and the missing dark windows on one side. The only one that may be more sloppy is the negh'var with its gaps on the ventral sideThe Probert C took a while to sell out, I was expecting it to go in seconds.

The missing texture is just too odd, and the missing dark windows on one side. The only one that may be more sloppy is the negh'var with its gaps on the ventral sideThe Probert C took a while to sell out, I was expecting it to go in seconds.
There was going to be a partswork model of the 1701-D years ago (but never came to pass) that would have been assembled from clear lucite slabs showing a blueprint of each deck, sounds like you would have liked that.I want to be able to pull it apart and see elaborately detailed diorama on every deck. Wait until I start laying out the 1701D like I did the Republic Cruiser.
There was going to be a partswork model of the 1701-D years ago (but never came to pass) that would have been assembled from clear lucite slabs showing a blueprint of each deck, sounds like you would have liked that.
Oops, realized I didn't include the link in the previous post:I would have loved it. I’m an RPG fan who does realistic gaming maps so this already draws my interest.
I wonder if that would have been caught if Eaglemoss didn't go out of business? I can't imagine much quality control happened towards the end. Not that such cock-ups weren't par for the course at Eaglemoss anyway, lol.am I the only one just now noticing the registry on the Yosemite shuttle is wrong.
the model is 77567 but it should be 75567.
not that it would have stopped me from buying but wow.
am I the only one just now noticing the registry on the Yosemite shuttle is wrong.
the model is 77567 but it should be 75567.
not that it would have stopped me from buying but wow.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/lower-decks-trailer-analysis.304957/#post-13455201The ships registry says 75567, but the shuttle says 77567. I wonder if someone screwed up, or the shuttlecraft is from a different ship that just happens to have the same last 3 numbers.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/the-ships-of-lower-decks.307697/page-54#post-14298447We are clearly being trolled, with the NCC-77567 shuttle 'Red Wood' landing next to the NCC-75567 shuttle 'Redwood' in the Cerritos shuttlebay.![]()
I'll never know why they never did a separated Galaxy. I know they didn't want to do a separatable one, presumably for the same reasons they didn't do a movable Intrepid or Bird of Prey, but a special with the separate parts and two stands would have been great.
100% this. Especially given the rabid devotion given to every other conceivable variation of Voyager.
I’m kinda surprised they never went with “battle damaged” versions...
I always had those filed under “eventually”, but it is surprising they never did at least one, they were quick enough to do mirror universe versions.I’m kinda surprised they never went with “battle damaged” versions like Johnny Lightning did. You could have had the Reliant from WoK, the 1701 from Wok/Search for Spock, Voyager from Year of Hell, NX-01 from Azati Prime, etc…
I always had those filed under “eventually”, but it is surprising they never did at least one, they were quick enough to do mirror universe versions.
Oh, I guess I forgot to mention, but Whistl seems to use other services for the actual shipping (usually Landmark), if you use the supplied tracking number with the actual shipping service's website then it works much better.seems like them using Royal Mail to ship actually is faster than Whistl that they used before. And the online tracker actually works.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.