South of 2270, I'd put everything on the New Jersey. North of 2270, the Enterprise-A.I would think they have sections of the ship redresses like her predecessor was in both the 2270s and 2280s. Plus a section dedicated to the other ships of her class.
One wonders if the USS New Jersey has a bunch of stuff on it about April, Pike, and Kirk's Enterprise, or of they kept that on the NCC-1701-A? Or would they do that sort of thing inside the station itself?
I was thinking more of how TUC uses Engineering, Sickbay and the Conference room essentially unchanged. The last is probably the worst since the 1701-D's windows obviously won't be on the exterior model of the refit.
If I had to bet, if we had seen it on screen, it would have been in TUC arrangement because thats where it "earned its place in history"..at Khitomer.
As for the TNG bridge, there's two possibilities:
1: Geordi really did totally undo all the Generations refit work
2: This is the TNG series bridge module that was removed during the refit between TNG S7 and Generations.
I suspect the latter is more likely than the former.
The TNG bridge and the GEN bridge aren't that different, just side-stations added and steps underneath Picard, Riker, and Troi's chairs. I think it was a bridge modification, not a bridge replacement. Geordi just liked the series configuration better than the movie configuration.Agreed. It's possible the 2365-2370 Enterprise-D bridge module was already a Starfleet Museum exhibit and all Geordi had to do was plug it back in, job done.
I had 3 classic/antique cars: 1955 Packard Clipper, 1968 Pontiac Firebird and 1973 Ford Mustang Mach I. All needed work to varying degrees, but in the case of all three, the mechanical parts were all taken out, taken apart, cleaned and put back together. Much more a process than I expected, but being so involved and intense a process, it became such a personal bond with the cars. You were more than driving them. You became a part of the car and it you.The TNG bridge and the GEN bridge aren't that different, just side-stations added and steps underneath Picard, Riker, and Troi's chairs. I think it was a bridge modification, not a bridge replacement. Geordi just liked the series configuration better than the movie configuration.
He spent 20 years restoring the Enterprise-D, so I can see him taking the time to get things looking exactly how he wanted them. Guaranteed, nothing about restoring the ship was simple.
I tried restoring a public domain film from 1929 called New York Nights (fixing the sound is an issue, because audio recording was still so primitive)...
....and it got me interested in looking at looking at mechanics' efforts to restore cars, and they go all out with everything. They take the cars apart, they replace whatever they need to, they clean up whatever they have to, fix everything, it's a crazy entire process.
Here's part 1 of a 28-part video series by Epic Restorationz, where they restore a 1930 Model A Ford. It's a really fascinating watch, if you're interested this type of thing.
So I was heavily into this topic during the months before Geordi unveiled the refurbished Enterprise-D.
Everyone probably told Geordi it was a lost cause (if it's something that actually took 20 years), no could restore it, and that probably made him determined to make it happen.
With the Enterprise-A? I don't know. We don't know if it went straight to the Fleet Museum, or if that's just where it ended up. If the Fleet Museum is where the E-A ended up, then it could've been in all kinds of other people's hands in-between.
If they didn't kill Kirk in Generations, you know at some point they'd have thought of something even more horrific for him. After all, who thought Spock would die all alone trapped in an alternate timeline with Steve Trevor and Sylar?Generations! It ruined everything good about TNG *and* the farewell to TOS.
Indeed. My opinion soured considerably over the years. I feel like Spock has a better death and that was off screen!The TUC bridge wasn't destroyed, so there would be no reason to replace it with an earlier version. As for the 1701-D bridge: it never changed. Fvck Generations! It ruined everything good about TNG *and* the farewell to TOS.
Just to be clear: I wasn't talking about the E-A bridge. Just the TNG-looking sets on the E-A.The TUC bridge wasn't destroyed, so there would be no reason to replace it with an earlier version. As for the 1701-D bridge: it never changed. Fvck Generations! It ruined everything good about TNG *and* the farewell to TOS.
If they didn't kill Kirk in Generations, you know at some point they'd have thought of something even more horrific for him. After all, who thought Spock would die all alone trapped in an alternate timeline with Steve Trevor and Sylar?
Oh I agree. I'm saying that with the desperation to drum up interest in Trek, especially in the rough years of the 2000s-2010s, even if Generations never happened they wouldn't have resisted going back to Kirk. Even the Kelvin movies coasted off the hype of Nimoy's involvement.I didn't need to know how Kirk died. His story ended with TUC, as it should have with all the TOS characters (minus Spock, who had already appeared on TNG earlier that year).
Oh I agree. I'm saying that with the desperation to drum up interest in Trek, especially in the rough years of the 2000s-2010s, even if Generations never happened they wouldn't have resisted going back to Kirk. Even the Kelvin movies coasted off the hype of Nimoy's involvement.
Indeed. And even if they did revisit Kirk in the future, like Nimoy, it would be a better showing than Generations.I didn't need to know how Kirk died. His story ended with TUC, as it should have with all the TOS characters (minus Spock, who had already appeared on TNG earlier that year).
Sure. Shatner was supposed to be in ST'09, remember, if only as a hologram recording. But we could have done without the "hold my beer" from Generations. In fact, in my head canon it never happened. The TNG movies can start off with First Contact. Just put in some dialog about the D being retired.
Personally, I like the Generations refit to the Enterprise-D bridge; makes it feel more alive.The TUC bridge wasn't destroyed, so there would be no reason to replace it with an earlier version. As for the 1701-D bridge: it never changed. Fvck Generations! It ruined everything good about TNG *and* the farewell to TOS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.