• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The took "Constructed at San Francisco Fleet Yards" too literally?

Mine preserves canon, but yours is more dramatic.

Mine can be made to work within canon, if we assume that "Q" for some reason later altered the time-line to bring Earth back into existence.

I think that's a thoroughly reasonable assumption, completely in line with the way alien science works in the "Star Trek Universe."
 
In the trailer, the Enterprise "appears" to be being constructed ON earth, and even out in the open.I really can't wait to see how they intend on explaining that away.Sure, the Enterprise WAS constructed at the San Fran ffleet Yards, but even Archer's Enterprise was constructed in orbit.Were they ever to build anything of the Enterprise's design totally under Earth gravity it would collapse undr it's own weight.I'm seriously hoping that the trailer is just misleading us and that the ship is built in San Fran orbital fleet yards that might stay in orbit directly over San Francisco.Trying to get us to believe a Constitution class starship can be built on Earth,under Earth Gravity is pushing things beyond believability.

Earth orbital(San Francisco) fleet yards most likely,Utopia Plaitia(Mars Gravity makes it somewhat plausible),Antares ship yards(not in existence at TOS time).

Okay, Kurgan, drop the Trekkie-speak, take off the dilithium tinted glasses and take a deep breath. It's just a teaser. Nothing more, nothing less. Until there is confirmation that it's either an actual scene from the movie, or that it's just a metaphor for the movie, or the whole franchise, being under construction, you should just relax. And if it is, WHO CARES?? I mean, who really cares if it was built in Area 51, some made up San Francisco shipyard, in orbit, on Mars, or in Hackensack, New Jersey?? Certainly not the mainstream moviegoer. You know, the majority that matters ? And not us, the Trekkie loser minority. I honestly can't believe that this is still a source of debate.
 
Last edited:
Well.. At least we got past the whole Shatner/Pine "Blue/Brown/Hazel" Eye thing.. I am worried that some rabid fan will cut off Pegg's right middle finger.
 
Mine preserves canon, but yours is more dramatic.

Mine can be made to work within canon, if we assume that "Q" for some reason later altered the time-line to bring Earth back into existence.

I'd prefer a scenario in which, at some future date, Jean-luc Picard does something incredibly careless, thereby preserving your dramatic -- but brief -- scenario at the cost of his own competence and credibility.

I'm into short-term gratification. Bring it on.
 
^ Actually both of you are wrong. They will change the location of the universe to get the Enterprise into space. Obviously.
 
Actually, I'm hoping that the Temporal Cold War is somehow involved. There's so much more good still to come from that.

I'm betting that FutureGuy was actually the newly designed NCC-1701. If you look closely at his silhouette, you can see the wings.
 
Now, the important thing about "Q" bringing back the Earth after its destruction is:

1) It happens during his first encounter with Picard on the U.S.S. Stargazer (about ten years before "Encounter At Farpoint);"

2) Everyone remembers the Earth having been destroyed and having lived alternate lives and then finding themselves back on Earth ten years ago but no one ever mentions it because, hey, it happened ten years ago and how often do you talk about ten years ago?

Of course, since Picard forgets to ask "Q" his name, no one recognizes him when he appears again in "Encounter."
 
Last edited:
It's hard to believe that there are times when I want the moderators around here to be even more heavy handed.
 
Is it just me, or has the ST Team continually screwed up Canon repeatedly. This is yet another example of that. Don't get me wrong, I am excited about the film, but I think this is the last attempt to make it viable again.

Its just you...

Sharr


Doubtful since Enterpise had First Contact with the Ferengi and Romulans when TOS and TNG were supposedly the first for Both.

That's not important IMAO.
 
Is it just me, or has the ST Team continually screwed up Canon repeatedly. This is yet another example of that. Don't get me wrong, I am excited about the film, but I think this is the last attempt to make it viable again.

Its just you...

Sharr


Doubtful since Enterpise had First Contact with the Ferengi and Romulans when TOS and TNG were supposedly the first for Both.

Nope. The Ferengi were a known entity to the Federation when Picard is assigned to track down a Ferengi ship that stole an energy converter. How else would Starfleet know their name, ship designs and culture? "The Last Outpost" was just the first official face to face meeting. IIRC, there is a Ferrengi at the bar where Picard was injured in a fight with a Nausican as a young man. Obviously the Ferengi have been working in around UFP space for a long time without taking to the time to announce themselves.

The Romulans fought a war with Earth 100 years prior to TOS. (As established in "The Balance of Terror" a TOS episode) So Romulans showing up around the time of ENT makes perfect sense.
 
There's also the fact that the Stargazer was fired on by a Ferengi Marauder while Picard was in command, ten or thirteen years before the "official" meeting.

But the Ferengi didn't give their name that time, either, so no one remembered them or their ships.

And there's no way that TOS featured first contact between the Romulans and humans - they fought a little war, remember, about one hundred years previous. In Kirk's time, no "human, ally or Romulan has ever seen the other" - as far as they knew. Stiles is quick to point out that there might be Romulan spies aboard the Enterprise - obviously he wasn't a big fan of canon, and so was able to reason that when one doesn't know what someone looks like, one doesn't recognize them when one sees them. :cool:
 
Michael Okuda's textual commentaries are not canon!

The fans who deride the trailer as non-canon and use non-canon resources to support their arguments are incredibly irritating to me.

Well, as far as the trailer goes, it ISN'T canon. If the trailer had been a big delta logo flying through space being buzzed by the Big E, would THAT have been "canon" as well? Are there moon-sized star trek logos flying around out there we should know about

And to be honest, you can't even tell it's on earth, that's just an assumption. There is no sky or trees or grass, just a lot of smoke and steam and a black background AFAICT. It could be an enclosed orbital facility like Utopia Planetia.
 
And to be honest, you can't even tell it's on earth, that's just an assumption. There is no sky or trees or grass...
...no Golden Gate Bridge shoehorned into the background, no matter which direction you're looking (never mind that's it's always been completely impossible to see from the old, earthbound Naval Shipyard... ) ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top