That's why I quit it a month ago. Beat the Christmas rush.
what the fuck?Going, going, gone...
https://deadline.com/2023/05/disney...ow-y-dollface-turner-hooch-pistol-1235372512/
My sympathies to anyone who thought that 'Willow' wasn't cancelled and just "on hold".
This why I still buy physical media.
Where can I buy Loki Season 1 on 4K? It's not coming up on Amazon.
Seriously though; people should learn how to make a copy of anything they care about on streaming. Even a big external HDD is not that expensive these days.
D+ Marvel series aren't available on disc.
That was my point. No use telling people to buy physical when they don't exist.
Perhaps they plan to do an add-on "archive" service they can charge extra for. Because it can't be costing them money to keep their own shows on the main service, can it?I don't understand - won't remove content from their streaming service make the struggling service even less attractive?
And where do they plan on putting their content? I mean, it's meant for people to see it somewhere?
Perhaps they plan to do an add-on "archive" service they can charge extra for. Because it can't be costing them money to keep their own shows on the main service, can it?
Disney is nefarious.Yeah, that's a good point. These days I only collect the Star Trek series, so those have still been coming out. I didn't know that about the Disney stuff, I figured everything still had a multi-media release.
Well that's just double dumb now that I know that.
I don't understand - won't remove content from their streaming service make the struggling service even less attractive?
And where do they plan on putting their content? I mean, it's meant for people to see it somewhere?
Perhaps they plan to do an add-on "archive" service they can charge extra for. Because it can't be costing them money to keep their own shows on the main service, can it?
I don't understand - won't remove content from their streaming service make the struggling service even less attractive?
And where do they plan on putting their content? I mean, it's meant for people to see it somewhere?
I think that's the point highlighted by the writer's strike. It's costing them residuals and they're making a point in showing they can simply remove their own content and voila, no more residuals.
Where can I buy Loki Season 1 on 4K? It's not coming up on Amazon.
Seriously though; people should learn how to make a copy of anything they care about on streaming. Even a big external HDD is not that expensive these days.
Howard will not be removed from Disney+. The documentary about famous Little Mermaid lyricist Howard Ashman was on the original list of titles set to be pulled May 26 that Disney had sent out to partners. The list is being reevaluated, and there could be additional changes, a rep for Disney said.
Hmm.Howard will not be removed
https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1659627926114172928
They figure that they're paying out more in license fees to stream and whatever residuals for something their metrics show not enough eyeballs are actually watching. They Disney pay a fee to someone whether a subscriber clicks or not; so they cull stuff not getting enough views.I don't understand - won't remove content from their streaming service make the struggling service even less attractive?
And where do they plan on putting their content? I mean, it's meant for people to see it somewhere?
Do not encourage piracy. No further discussion on this matter will be allowed.
Recording a programme while you're watching it is not piracy. Or are you claiming that everyone who used a VCR to record a show off network television was a pirate too?
Is there a better topic to be directed to for content recording discussion? Because I would like to know if it would be considered 'legal' to home record an episode of Game of Thrones from HBO's cable channel, but would be considered 'illegal' to do the exact same thing with that same episode from HBO Max.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.