• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Walking After Midnight: Vampires in Literature and Media

Trollheart

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
Note to mods: I realise this may not be allowed, but would ask you to give it a chance. While this may look like, and indeed fulfill the criteria for a blog, I don't consider it one. Though I write a lot in these journals of mine, and do a lot of research, there's nothing I like better than debate, comment and discussion, and it would be my hope this will engender all of that. At the same time, I realise you have your rules, and I'm only new here, so will of course abide by them.

Thanks for your consideration.
Trollheart.

vampiretitle1e.png

It’s a fact that we all like to be scared. Some more than others, and me less than most, but yeah, we all enjoy a good fright from time to time. BOO! See what I mean? ;) Throughout our history, one figure has lurked in the darkness of our collective hearts, haunted our nightmares, fired our imagination and fed our curiosity. For many of us, our first encounter with the creature known as a vampire was through the writing of Bram Stoker, or perhaps through Hollywood’s later interpretation of his horror classic Dracula, but this was written just over a century ago, and itself was partially based on a person who existed, who lived four hundred years previous to that.

But in reality, the myth of the vampire dates back much, much farther than that. Most religions and beliefs have tales of creatures who stalk the night and drink the blood of the unwary, the innocent, the damned, and it could be said that the vampire is a manifestation, perhaps the physical form of the Devil himself, Satan, the Fallen Angel of Christian belief. Or any demon in any religion or faith. Without exception, the vampire is seen as evil, a dark creature luring its victims into its cold embrace, but its glamour is such that an entire industry has grown up around the myth. From books and then movies, television series and of course music, the vampire has been celebrated for hundreds of years, feared and loathed for hundreds more.

I’ve always been fascinated by vampires, and though of course they don’t exist (my master has told me to say that, and you will believe him for he is master) the tales told of them are so compelling, so absorbing, often so terrifying and real that sometimes it’s easy to believe that they do lurk there in the shadows, watching, waiting, patient, quiet, deadly. Vampires have infiltrated every corner of our lives, from the books we read to the movies we watch, the games we play and the music we listen to. In this journal I’ll be investigating the myth (yes, Master, I told them it was a myth, like you said) behind the vampire, and taking a close look at how this phenomenon has influenced us, making millions for some of us, and providing entertainment, terror and intrigue for the rest.

I’ll be looking at the books, from Rice to Meyer and Harris and of course Stoker; at movies such as the Dracula franchise, Hammer Horror and other, less conventional vampire movies such as Let the Right One In, TV series including of course Buffy, Angel, True Blood and The Vampire Diaries as well as lesser-known works such as Moonlight, Blood Ties and Forever Knight also more light-hearted fare - Duckula, Neighbors from Hell and the recent series spin-off from the movie What We Do In the Shadows. Wherever vampires figure in music, natch, we’ll be there, and I’ll look at games as well, like Vampire: the Masquerade and Castlevania.

But it won’t be all fiction. There are, believe it nor not, people out there who actually think they are vampires. There are others who pretend they are, and rather sadly but perhaps inevitably, (and tying in with my other journal, begun on this same day) there are records of serial killers who have performed vampire-like deeds while perpetrating their heinous crimes, particularly the so-called Vampire of Dusseldorf and Vampire of Sacramento, and of course the infamous Countess Bathory. I’ll be checking their stories out and trying to get inside their twisted minds: hope I can find my way out again.

So you know, if you feel like you need to keep the lights on, or whistle tunelessly to yourself or talk to your cat while reading this, I won’t hold it against you. Maybe you’re the type who scoffs at such notions (my master loves your kind!) and loudly proclaims there’s no such thing, but remember what Shakespeare wrote, and if there are more things in Heaven and Earth that are dreamed of in your philosophy, my friend, perhaps, just perhaps, there are more things in Hell you can’t even dream of too.

Sleep well…
spooky-castle-illuminated-against-a-full-moon-picture-id891589350


news-vampire-fangs-2.jpg


real-life-vampires-of-new-england-and-abroad-631.jpg

Dark Genesis: Crouching in the Shadows

So where did the idea of vampires come from? Nobody knows. It’s a very complicated question, and you can search for, and find, answers that fit the further back into history you go. Human myth has always had evil figures, back to Satan and before him too, but why vampires? Why blood? Well I guess you can say blood is the thing that allows us all to live; lose enough of it and you’re dead, so anything trying to take it from you can be seen as dangerous and evil. But a serial killer (or just a regular, garden variety killer) will do that, and while we might fear such an event, we haven’t (quite) built up the kind of mythology around serial killers as we have around vampires.

Ah, but vampires don’t just take blood, do they? They use it to fuel themselves. They thrive on it. They feed on it. And that’s the scary bit. Of course, vampires don’t exist. Well, yes they do. Both of those sentences are lies. So is that one. If something is out there (or worse, in there, waiting by the foot of your bed or at the top of the stairs or just inside your door) that wants to catch you and suck your blood so as to prolong its own life or lend it strength, hell, that’s worrying. That would be bad enough were it not for the many powers vampires are said to possess, but more of that later. We’re getting off the beaten track and wandering into dark, cold, lonely forests where the kind of things lurk that we’re trying to avoid… come back here, don’t stray! They could be out there, just waiting for someone like you.
71d5KhFL45L._SS500_.jpg

I think it was Anne Rice who coined the phrase “the blood is the life”, and so it is. Without it, or enough of it, we die. And the idea that something exists that could, and will, steal the life-force from us for its own selfish and evil ends is an unsettling one, but also an intriguing one, which has led to, as already mentioned, the growth of an entire entertainment industry built around the vampire. Blood has always had a special significance in most religions. Some spilled it as a way of appeasing their gods, sacrificing animals or even humans on crude altars. Some drank it (usually only animal, in this case) to gain strength and perhaps knowledge, and even in Christian mythos Jesus urges his disciples, and though them, us, to drink his blood in memory of him. Does this mean Jesus was a vampire? Surely not: (note: idea for possible novel!) in this case the blood is not blood at all, but wine - merely a symbol, a metaphor for the ordeal he was about to go through. Yet even to Jesus Christ, the importance of blood could not be overstated. If you’re going to remember my sacrifice, he said, remember my blood.
71U4WPakgqL._AC_SX522_.jpg

Quite apart from the vampiric myths, human dread has been driven by the fear of the dead returning for as long as we could imagine it. Zombies, ghouls, revenants and ghosts all figure prominently in the shared terror of humanity, part of that fear possibly rising from the belief that if the dead can come back, perhaps there is nothing after death; no Heaven, no afterlife, no God? We surely also didn’t want to see Aunt Matilda up and walking around hours after we had buried her, and we certainly didn’t want her scratching at our windows and demanding to be let in!

Writers like Rice and Tanith Lee have postulated - presumably only for fictional purposes, though who knows what they actually believe, if anything - that the vampire legend may have gone back as far as the Egyptians. Anne Rice sets The Queen of the Damned, the tour-de-force third instalment in her Vampire Chronicles in Egypt, blaming the plague of vampires on evil spirits which inhabit the bodies of the king and queen, while Tanith Lee, in the Blood Opera series claims the ancient tale of Osiris to be the source of the myth. There are those who suggest that Judas Iscariot was the first vampire, punished as a result of his betrayal of Jesus.

But the general consensus seems to be that what we know as the “traditional” vampire originates in Eastern Europe, in the Balkan countries, where long-held folk beliefs spoke of the dead coming back to life if not properly buried with the correct rituals. It would probably be true to say that there are, or were, two distinct types of vampire down through history. The first, referred to above, which we’ll call the “traditional” or “folk” vampire, tended to be fat and bloated, red or purple in colour, and likely to have blood around its lips or on its face. These type of vampires were seen more as beasts or demons, incapable of any sort of feeling, perhaps almost automatons controlled by some evil spirit, almost dark puppets. They would have had no communication with their victims, would display no emotion and would probably walk stiffly, having been just recently dead.

The second, or what we’ll call the “romantic” vampire, never existed in folk belief but only came to life, as it were, through the pen of gothic fiction writers such as Sheridan Le Fanu, Lord Byron and Bram Stoker. In these stories, the vampire was a cultured, educated, often noble being (Count Dracula being the most obvious example) who used his (almost always his, until people started writing about female vampires some time later) charm and animal magnetism, suave nature and noble bearing to ensorcell victims into obeying his commands. The romantic vampire is well-dressed, refined, usually somewhat at ease with the world around him, very much aware of his power and has no scruples at all about using it to get what he wants. Apart from unnaturally pale skin and perhaps red eyes, outwardly he looks the same as a living man, though he may have far greater strength. He walks as a man, talks as a man and often lives as a man, in a castle, house, or other habitation, unlike the folk or traditional specimen, who was usually expected to hang out at graveyards and cemeteries, and head back to his own grave before sunrise.

In fact, both species of vampire are tied to their own coffins, be they in cemeteries or in the cellars or attics of huge houses; a vampire, traditionally and romantically, sleeps through the day in his coffin, only rising at night, when the sun, which is deadly to their kind, has set. This, along with the drinking of blood, is probably the only real point of similarity between the two types, and the romantic vampire can certainly be seen as an evolution of, or an attempt by writers to evolve the traditional or folk vampire. Why? I guess because people identify more with a living (as such), thinking, feeling being other than just a monster. Vampires may be all monsters, but we can understand one that is more like a man than one that is basically a beast. It also allows the writer more freedom to develop the character of the vampire. No woman is going to fall in love with a beastly demon who may not even be able to speak, but Count Dracula, Lestat or Angel, now that’s a different matter.
33020_1216114045067_304_380.jpg
 
This is where I shamelessly mention writing a book on this subject decades ago: The Transylvanian Library: A Consumer's Guide to Vampire Literature.

It's woefully out-of-date now, but I expound on the subject of vampire fiction at length.


FYI: Anne Rice absolutely did not coin the phrase "the blood is the life." It's paraphrased from the Bible, and as far as vampires goes, is said by both Dracula and Renfield in Bram Stoker's novel, way back in 1897. Bela Lugosi also says it in the original 1931 movie version:

"The spider spinning its web for the unwary fly. The blood is the life, Mister Renfield."

Just to belabor the point, "For the Blood is the Life" is also the title of a classic vampire story by F. Marion Crawford, first published in 1911 -- long before Anne Rice.
 
Last edited:
I was never a huge fan of vampire stuff.

Except Daybreakers of course. :mallory:

I grew up on vintage Dracula movies, Dark Shadows, and Hammer Horror flicks. Vampires are in my blood.

Ironically, I have yet to see DAYBREAKERS although the DVD has been sitting on my shelf for years. :)
 
I remember there were two different Super Friends episodes which dealt with vampirism.

In neither one did anyone mention blood or get bitten. The vamps spread by...laser beams. :guffaw:
 
I remember there were two different Super Friends episodes which dealt with vampirism.

In neither one did anyone mention blood or get bitten. The vamps spread by...laser beams. :guffaw:

I think some of the Spider-Man cartoons have danced around the fact that Morbius sucks blood from people.

Which is weird to me. Since when have little kids been too young to cope with vampires? Again, I can't remember when I didn't know about Bela Lugosi and such. Vampires and vampire movies were a big part of my childhood, and not just on Halloween.
 
The vamp episodes did scare the hell out of me tho.

But the idiocy didn't stop with the laser beams either. In one of the eps, the passengers and crew of an airliner are turned into vampires when the plane flies through a gas cloud. They turn into bats and fly away (and the plane, now empty, conveniently does not crash), land on the ground, turn back into humanoids, then release more of the same gas which turns other people into vamps. (Guess they thought using their laser-eyes would be too efficient.) They didn't even stay consistent IN THAT EPISODE! :lol:

Oh and the other vamp episode was called "Voodoo Vampire". Apparently actual voodoo (which of course has nothing to do with any of this) is yet another thing they were too stupid to understand. :rolleyes:

Then again, this is the same series which had an episode where THE SUN GOES OUT and all that happens is...it gets dark. :guffaw:
 
even in Christian mythos Jesus urges his disciples, and though them, us, to drink his blood in memory of him. Does this mean Jesus was a vampire? Surely not: (note: idea for possible novel!) in this case the blood is not blood at all, but wine - merely a symbol, a metaphor for the ordeal he was about to go through.
In Catholicism, it's not a symbol. Through the miracle of transubstantiation, the wine at mass becomes the blood (and the tasteless wafers the body).

I'm not big on horror as a genre, but vampires fascinate me. Perhaps it's the immortal youth.
 
In Catholicism, it's not a symbol. Through the miracle of transubstantiation, the wine at mass becomes the blood (and the tasteless wafers the body).

I'm not big on horror as a genre, but vampires fascinate me. Perhaps it's the immortal youth.

I confess: I first learned about the concept of transubstantiation by reading "Dracula" in sixth grade. I didn't understand why Van Helsing was sprinkling wafers in Dracula's coffin. My dad had to explain about Communion wafers and whole wine-into-blood, bread-into-flesh thing -- which I had somehow managed to never hear about until then.

Pretty sure I first learned about holy water from an old Hammer vampire flick, too.
 
First off, thanks so much guys for commenting! I wasn't sure if this would be received with any sort of interest, but it seems it is, so thanks.

This is where I shamelessly mention writing a book on this subject decades ago: The Transylvanian Library: A Consumer's Guide to Vampire Literature.

It's woefully out-of-date now, but I expound on the subject of vampire fiction at length.


FYI: Anne Rice absolutely did not coin the phrase "the blood is the life." It's paraphrased from the Bible, and as far as vampires goes, is said by both Dracula and Renfield in Bram Stoker's novel, way back in 1897. Bela Lugosi also says it in the original 1931 movie version:

"The spider spinning its web for the unwary fly. The blood is the life, Mister Renfield."

Just to belabor the point, "For the Blood is the Life" is also the title of a classic vampire story by F. Marion Crawford, first published in 1911 -- long before Anne Rice.
Yes I remember realising that after I wrote this. Interview with the Vampire was probably the second vampire novel I read (can't remember the first, but I think it was the drunken musings of some half-mad Irishman or something) and in fact it might even have been from Tanith Lee's "The Blood of Roses" that I got it, but yes, I read about it being in the bible and did a facepalm.

FYI Crawford's story will certainly be covered, but as I'm beginning at the beginning, that will be a while.
In Catholicism, it's not a symbol. Through the miracle of transubstantiation, the wine at mass becomes the blood (and the tasteless wafers the body).

I'm not big on horror as a genre, but vampires fascinate me. Perhaps it's the immortal youth.
Yes sorry I didn't mean to offend any Catholics. I'm just speaking from outside, as it were. I'm an RC but not a believer, so to me it's all symbolism. I understand millions believe it actually happens.
The novel I co-wrote, Midnight in Never Land, began as a half serious discussion about Jesus (and others) as a vampire. Settled on Peter Pan for the novel .
Sounds interesting. Didn't Wes Craven have a movie in which Judas was the first vampire? Maybe Dracula 2000 or something like that?
I confess: I first learned about the concept of transubstantiation by reading "Dracula" in sixth grade. I didn't understand why Van Helsing was sprinkling wafers in Dracula's coffin. My dad had to explain about Communion wafers and whole wine-into-blood, bread-into-flesh thing -- which I had somehow managed to never hear about until then.

Pretty sure I first learned about holy water from an old Hammer vampire flick, too.

As a good Irish boy, I read all about transubwotsit, and we were actually told that we couldn't touch the Host, so if it got stuck to the roof of your mouth (as it always did) then you had to spend AGES trying to pry it loose with your tongue, because God would strike you down if you touched it with your fingers. Made my tongue very tired, I can tell you.

There was also a story going around about this kid who supposedly took the Host out of his mouth and (for reasons best known to himself, or more likely just to make the story more horrible) stabbed it with a fork, and out spurted blood. As a kid, that one shook me up.

Thanks again for the comments, guys! Next post tomorrow, as we investigate what it is that makes a vampire tick.
 
Sounds interesting. Didn't Wes Craven have a movie in which Judas was the first vampire? Maybe Dracula 2000 or something like that?.

That's the one. With Jeri Ryan, aka Seven of Nine as one of Dracula's brides.

Always liked Tanith Lee's vampire stories, btw. Just recently reread her "Red as Blood" (Snow White as a vampire) and her novel Sabella, about an alien vampire in the far future. "Bite-Me-Not" is another favorite of mine.
 
That's the one. With Jeri Ryan, aka Seven of Nine as one of Dracula's brides.

Always liked Tanith Lee's vampire stories, btw. Just recently reread her "Red as Blood" (Snow White as a vampire) and her novel Sabella, about an alien vampire in the far future. "Bite-Me-Not" is another favorite of mine.
I preferred her Flat Earth stories. I must say I did not like "Bite-me-Not", thought it was very slow and had a poor ending. Another of hers that went off the rails was the Blood Opera sequence: "Dark Dance" was great, "Personal Darkness" not so good and "Darkness, I" just drove me mad. She basically copied Rice's Egyptian ideas from "The Queen of the Damned". I do like her writing though; another sad loss, along with Rice. Did you ever read Brian Lumley's "Necrocope"/"Vampire World" novels?
 
In general, I preferred Lee's short fiction to her novels, although I published a YA fantasy trilogy by her at Tor Books decades ago. Never read the "Blood Opera" saga.

I read and enjoyed the first few "Necroscope" novels, although I quickly fell behind in that series and never caught up.

Probably my favorite recent vampire novel is "Reluctant Immortals" by Gwendolyn Kiste: Lucy Westerna (from Dracula) and Bertha Rochester (from Jane Eyre) are ageless and undead in 1960s California. Enjoyed that a few months ago.

Heard good things about "House of Hunger" by Alexis Henderson. Planning to check that out once I catch up with my reading a little.
 
I keep meaning to check the "Anno Dracula" novels by Kim Stanely Robinson. So much to do, so little time. Unless I was a vampire. Which, for the record, so far as you all know, I'm not. Just look into my eyes...

Incidentally, if you're interested, I've written some vampire short stories too. Shite ones, but still, you can read if you want.
 
Last edited:
I keep meaning to check the "Anno Dracula" novels by Kim Stanely Robinson. So much to do, so little time. Unless I was a vampire. Which, for the record, so far as you all know, I'm not. Just look into my eyes...

Incidentally, if you're interested, I've written some vampire short stories too. Shite ones, but still, you can read if you want.


Nitpick: You mean Kim Newman, not Kim Stanley Robinson. Very different writers!

But I'm a big fan of the Anno Dracula novels, and Newman's work in general, although I still need to read "Johnny Alucard."

Thanks for the offer to read your stories, btw, but I'm kinda swamped with deadlines right now so they would probably just sit there in my email, making me feel guilty for not getting to them in a timely manner! :)
 
Nitpick: You mean Kim Newman, not Kim Stanley Robinson. Very different writers!
D'oh! Sort of like getting Tanith Lee mixed up with Harper Lee! :)
But I'm a big fan of the Anno Dracula novels, and Newman's work in general, although I still need to read "Johnny Alucard."

Thanks for the offer to read your stories, btw, but I'm kinda swamped with deadlines right now so they would probably just sit there in my email, making me feel guilty for not getting to them in a timely manner! :)
Ah no problem. I just thought I'd mention it. if you're ever interested just let me know.

And on we go.

vampire-halloween-warning-sign12.jpg

Vampires: the Dos and Don’ts

Because vampires are not real (yes, master, I told them. I’m sure they believe … wait. You guys can’t hear my thoughts, can you? Ah. Just checking. Carry on then) they don’t really obey any set rules, though their behaviour has been dictated by writers over the last two centuries. Because they are creatures of the night, creatures of Satan, creatures of Hell (sorry, master) they are seen to abhor saintly relics, religious artifacts and ceremonies. But not all do. The thing about fictional creatures is you, as a writer, can decide what rules they follow, and whether through artistic licence, ignorance, arrogance or sheer expediency for their plot, some writers have changed what vampires can and can’t do, and what they’re afraid of, what hurts them and what kills them.

Powers

Blood drinking
male-vampire-is-biting-a-beautiful-woman-picture-id125145244

Most writers (and let’s face it, folk legends aside, writers are the ones who make the rules for vampires) agree that vampires can drink blood, usually by sinking long sharp fangs into the jugular vein of the victim on the neck, which they then take into their own bloodless bodies, to fortify and keep them alive, or undead. This can also have the effect of lessening their pallor and making them seem outwardly more human. In some, it adds to their strength. Stoker and his like had their vampire “heroes” draw the blood delicately, like a connoisseur sampling a fine wine, while later writers would make vampires more brutal, less refined, tearing open the throat and ravaging the flesh, sometimes even ripping off the head. Stoker’s “fine gentleman drinking” idea was probably to reinforce the image of a cultured being who just happened to be a bloodsucker, whereas later the idea of showing these creatures up to be the monsters they are resulted in gorier and more horrible acts of violence perpetrated by the vampire against his victim.

Flight
c8a761297624aa61ff483d72f7c16742.jpg

Generally dropped fairly quickly, the initial idea was that the vampire could fly, usually by transforming himself into a bat or bird, sometimes by leaping from roof to roof so agilely and quickly that he might seem to be flying. Vampires were also able to climb and crawl up walls, like insects, something that is displayed to a terrifying degree when we first read it in Dracula.

Hypnotism
glowing-vampire-eyes.jpg

Vampires are supposed to be able to mould and massage the human will, staring into the eyes of a victim and binding them with its spell, so that they cannot run - or want to - and even in death do not struggle. However this mesmerism can also be used by a vampire to sway the mind of a human, to make them, for instance, doubt what they have seen, or to believe whatever it is the vampire tells them.

Strength

Generally agreed by all writers is that vampires are very strong, inhumanly so, and no mere mortal can best them physically.

Speed

Vampires possess the ability to move so fast that the human eye cannot follow; a vampire can be a distance away and then in a micro-second be right in front of you. They can also use this power to evade weapons such as bullets.

Procreation/Siring

Although vampires are dead (or undead) creatures and therefore have no seed with which to create new life, they can make other vampires, according to many writers. Methods of achieving this vary but usually it has to do with the vampire cutting his own veins and either feeding the blood to whomever he wishes to make a vampire (often called simply Making) or mixing it with their blood and feeding that to them. The vampire is then the new creatures’s Maker or Sire, and they, the new vampire, the fledgling, are entirely subservient to them, their new Master.

Non-Reflection
MH900399426.jpg

Not a power as such, but many writers (though not by any means all) hold to the ancient belief that a vampire loses its reflection after death and cannot be seen in a mirror. Surely makes it a bitch to shave, but it does mean a vampire can creep up on someone without being seen in a mirror. Bit pointless really, I feel, when they can just mesmerise the person, but it’s part of vampire lore, the idea being I think that God refuses to recognise the base creature and so it can’t be seen in a mirror, or the soul being part of the reflection, and the vampire, soulless, has no reflection.

Control of Animals

“Ah!” exclaims Count Dracula, as he listens at the window of his castle to wolves baying in the nearby forest. “The children of the night: what music they make!” Vampires are supposed to be able to control animals such as ravens, wolves, bears, dogs, bats etc.

Metamorphosis

As they can control animals, vampires can also take on the form of same, as again Dracula does in the novel, appearing both as a bat and later a large dog.

Immortality/Ageless

Although not always the case, it has become accepted that vampires either live very long lives or in some cases may be immortal, or the next best thing to it. As they are generally invulnerable, and do not age, only the most catastrophic of accidents or carelesness (being caught out in the sun/staked in their coffins etc) can terminate a vampire’s life, and so to all intents and purposes, providing they are careful they can be regarded as all but immortal. As mentioned, vampires do not age, and some writers have declared that the age the vampire was “made” remains his or her age throughout eternity, or as long as he or she lives. Most vampires would not bother with a scion (the issue of a vampire; their children, in name only) of advancing age, and so the vast majority of them are created young, or relatively young, and remain so.

Miscellaneous

Again not really powers, but vampires have heightened senses, especially hearing and smell, and they do not need to consume food, as they are dead.

PROHIBITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND THREATS

Powerful as they may be, there are things that can hurt, thwart or even in some cases kill vampires. Again, writers take from and add to these restrictions as they like, but some have been generally accepted as all but universal.


220px-The_Sun_by_the_Atmospheric_Imaging_Assembly_of_NASA%27s_Solar_Dynamics_Observatory_-_20100819.jpg

The Sun

Vampires don’t like the sun, and it doesn’t like them. Being creatures of darkness, who hunt at night and cling to the shadows, the power of the sun is the one thing they are powerless against. Every vampire must be in his or her coffin by the time the sun rises, or its power will burn them to ashes. It seems to be accepted that in order to be affected by the sun the vampire has to be in its direct path, and there are stories of vampires, caught out during the day, escaping with their lives by throwing a dark cloak and hood over themselves, dodging from shadowed spot to shadowed spot, pulling heavy drapes across sunlit rooms, or taking refuge in darkened environments such as blacked-out vans or warehouses.

The idea here again is that the sun represents the light of God and all that is good, and that the vampire cannot stand being in the light. His skin is sensitive to the heat and light of the sun, and his eyes are not accustomed to it. As something that should not exist on the Earth, he is able to hide in the shadows and live off people’s uncertainty and fear of the night, but in the blinding light of day his powers evaporate and he is as helpless as a newborn baby. Various writers and film-makers have different ideas of what the sun is supposed to do to vampires - some just burn like cinders, some flake away bit by bit, some burst into flames - but they’re all pretty much agreed that it kills them, though one - in my opinion, poor - writer did create a vampire in the TV series Moonlight who was able to go abroad by day in full sunlight, with the aid of only a rolled-up newspaper to protect him. Yeah. But that one was very much in the minority, and as a general, usually unbroken and unchallenged rule, vampires haunt the night and sleep in the day, fearing the touch of the sun.
FotorCreated_hwf_200_grande.jpg

Holy Water

It will come as no surprise that another supposed weapon used against the undead is holy water. Being blessed by priests, the instrument of God, seen as the adversary of vampires and all creatures of the night, holy water is meant to be not fatal to vampires, but it does (according to some writers) scar, blind or just really irritate them. Some even have it burning them like acid.

spanish-dracula-repelled-by-crucifix5.jpg

Crucifix


One of the classic early ways of holding off a vampire was to hold a crucifix in front of you, against which they were apparently powerless, this being the very symbol of Christ’s sacrifice for Man, and anathema to evil. Later on, some writers decided a simple cross wasn’t enough. You had to have the faith in the symbol to back it up, leading to one vampire (can’t remember in what) grinning at a priest who had lost his faith, knowing that the crucifix he held would not protect the man, as for him, it had lost its power. Mind you, according to Anne Rice, her vampires aren’t bothered by the symbol of Christian belief. Louis in Interview With the Vampire says “I’m quite fond of crucifixes actually” and to my recollection he actually wears one, though Lestat I think hates and reviles them, that is up until he meets God in Memnoch the Devil, but I don’t recall them hurting him.

Wooden Stake

Ah, the old stake through the heart! The classic way of killing a vampire. Except it doesn’t, not really. The idea is based on pinning the vampire to the earth by way of the wood, which is also natural, and so nature holds him, making it impossible for him to move or rise, essentially in a state of suspended animation. If someone should be foolish enough to remove the stake, however, look out, as the vampire will be free again. In this fashion, he is never dead - never can die, not by staking - and is merely awaiting his chance to be released by the unwary.

The series Buffy the Vampire Slayer, however, took this method more literally, and Buffy was able to despatch vampires by literally stabbing them through the heart with a pointed wooden stick, whereupon they collapsed into dust. I’ll check and confirm, but so far as I know, the wooden stake method has another proviso, this being that the vampire has to be staked in his own coffin. It can’t just be anywhere; he has to be basically returned to the place he rose from. Not sure, as I say, but I’ll research it.

Garlic

Not quite a weapon against vampires - you can’t hurl a piece of garlic at one and expect him to vanish in a puff of smoke - but believed to protect humans from the undead creatures. At this point I have no idea why, though I’ll be checking it out. Garlic would be traditionally worn around the neck on a string or hung over doors or windows to prevent the evil monster entering. Maybe it was just the smell that kept them out - I know it would me!

Rosaries

Another religious artifact, the rosary chain or rosary beads would be worn around the neck or held in the hand. As they are used in the mass, in confession and at other holy times, each one representing a prayer, they are said to be imbued with the power of God, and therefore proof against vampires.

Silver

Probably entirely a fictional creation with little or no basis in folklore, the idea that vampires can be stopped by silver seems to merge two very disparate ideas: that of the silver bullet being the only weapon that can kill a werewolf and, well, Kryptonite being the only substance capable of weakening Superman. Charlene Harris seems to have embraced this idea, with her vampire hero, Bill, in the series True Blood (based on her Southern Vampire Mysteries novels) chained in heavy silver as a punishment, and Lestat, too, at the end of Memnoch the Devil is so restrained, but these are the only instances of this restriction being used that I’ve come across to date.

Beheading

If you really want to stop a vampire, do as the zombie hunter do, and emulate the Queen of Hearts: off with his head! Removing a vampire’s head (before or after death or resurrection) is a sure-fire way to put him down. For good measure, you can then set it and him on fire. He ain’t coming back from that!


Barriers

Most writers over the years and centuries have changed, like many of the so-called laws governing vampires, the things they can and can’t do, but these are some of the ones sometimes held to be true.

Consecrated Ground

Vampires are said to be unable to walk on consecrated ground, that is, ground that has been blessed by a priest. Examples include church graveyards and churches themselves, as well as, one would assume, priests’ houses and seminaries. Rice gleefully flouts this when she has a coven of vampires living in the catacombs beneath the massive graveyard in Paris, who are shocked and scandalised when Lestat takes refuge in the cathedral of Notre Dame! Rice apart though (and probably others) it makes a certain kind of sense that vampires would shun churches, given that there would be such a confluence of religious artifacts there: holy water, crucifixes, etc.

Running Water

I’m not sure who came up with the idea, but someone decided vampires could not cross running water. Stoker ignored this when he sent Count Dracula on a sea voyage to England from his home in Transylvania, and most other writers (at least, relatively modern ones) seem to disown the idea too. Well, it’s hard for a writer to have her characters unable to move from country to country, after all.

Invitations

Generally held as universal, it’s said that a vampire cannot enter any habitation unless invited in by someone who lives there. This only needs to be done once though; after that, he can move in and out freely. Vampires have been known to hypnotise home-owners into inviting them in. There is disagreement about whether or not an invitation, once given, can be rescinded, but if it is allowed to work it has various results, from simply preventing the vampire to enter to actually bodily flinging him out of the dwelling.
 
Yes sorry I didn't mean to offend any Catholics. I'm just speaking from outside, as it were. I'm an RC but not a believer, so to me it's all symbolism. I understand millions believe it actually happens.
No offense taken. I know a lot of people are unfamiliar with it, that's why I chimed in.
 
My husband told me there's an old folk belief that if you scatter rice (or something similar) on the ground, the vampire has to count all the grains before doing anything else. Major OCD!
 
My husband told me there's an old folk belief that if you scatter rice (or something similar) on the ground, the vampire has to count all the grains before doing anything else. Major OCD!

I must say, I read a lot - and I mean a LOT! - about the folk beliefs when researching the opening chapter of this, and I didn't come across that. But then, I expect the lore varies widely from country to country and even region to region. Can you imagine? "29,996, 29,997, 29,99 - is that a virgin I see? Oh no: just a plastic bag blowing in the wind. Oh well, Where was I? 29,99... 29,99... Drat! 1, 2, 3...."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top