The Stargazer is definitely my favourite 25th century ship. The Inquiry is ok, even if only so, especially with these modifications, I never warmed up to the Odyssey (but perhaps I will now?).
good riddance!Might have been pointed out in the thread already, but we saw an actual phaser beam come from a ship in the last trailer, not a pew pew phaser bolt.
I like the Inquiry-class. It seems like a logical evolution from those "post-TNG" ships we see in First Contact to "post-post-TNG" ships. It looks fast and powerful and solid, and the improved deflector makes the world of difference. Rather this than some of the terrible Star Trek Online designs that are sneaking into the show!
Which means those dents won't just buff out and require a trip to a starbaseAs I wrote, the level of damage is still primarily surface level . There are fires burning but it isn't fatal. Not like an instant destruction. Van Sitters and Cerritos takes hits and the ships are still physically intact ala "Wrath of Khan".
(See Klingon Battlecruiser explode around 2:17)
Personally, I find the Inquiry class dull and industrial. A great, honking slab of starship with no artistry whatsoever. A lot of STO ships share that problem.
I do, however, like ships like the Odyssey and its varients, the Grissom (Oberth reskin), the Shran-class escort, etc. A lot of the alien ships are pretty good as well, such as most of the Romulans and the Tzenkethi. Most of the Klingon ships, however, need work, as do some of the Starfleet ones. STO is very "hit or miss" when it comes to ship designs.
The Klingon ship in your example was already badly damaged. And your dismissal of the damage suffered by Spacedock and the Ceritos as "fires burning" is understating the case, as the clips I posted show, the interior damage was far more extensive than a few ECODs.
I see the wide spread use of Ablative Hull Armor has done it's job.There is not such an excuse in "The Stars at Night" with the Aledo. The clip from Lower Decks shows the top of the unshielded Cerritos hit by a barrage of torpedoes yet none penetrate enough into or spread wide enough to hurt anyone on the bridge. Those fires we see are at worse a deck or two deep.
This contradicts the models we saw in Star Trek: Lower Decks, where the 23rd century USS Titan was a Loknar-class starship.The 23rd Century Titan is a Shangri-La Class Mark II according to Bill Krause.
https://universeodon.com/@AdmiralBuck/109586930359884112
You can also spot it in this PR shot.
![]()
I see the wide spread use of Ablative Hull Armor has done it's job.
Maybe it's standardized by this point across the fleet that it doesn't need to be mentioned?Except there isn't any ablative armor on the Cerritos.
Possible reconciliation:
1. The ships on display aboard the Titan and the Titan-A are selections, not the whole dynasty. That's consistent with those on the Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E.
2. The Loknar-class Titan underwent a refit to Shangri La-class configuration.
Maybe it's standardized by this point across the fleet that it doesn't need to be mentioned?
Whether it was there or not, the Aledo stripped Ceritos' hull to the frame in places and caused severe internal damage. Again, evidence against the "weak weapons" theory.
Weapon strength is plot based?
Moving on, I think I found the basis of Dr. Crusher's ship from the trailer. And it's another STO import.
![]()
This contradicts the models we saw in Star Trek: Lower Decks, where the 23rd century USS Titan was a Loknar-class starship.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.