So I suspect a more accurate term here would be "anti-Pfizer".
I have no problem with complaining that pharma companies put profits above everything else but you have to put his comment in the context of who he was replying to.
So I suspect a more accurate term here would be "anti-Pfizer".
40s. The 50s were a "Dark Age" for superhero comics with sales taking a nose dive and many titles being canceled or converted to non-superhero stories. DC for some reason fared better with only Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman led titles surviving. Fawcett stopped its comic line in 1953. The declining sales and the lawsuit being the one-two knockout punches.Yep. It is not a legal issue---that was settled long ago. The name was changed because DC thought that they couldn't compete with Captain Marvel as the MCU was on the rise. Captain Marvel was more popular than Superman in the 50s, I think. There is no legal reason why Shazam cannot go back to being Captain Marvel.
That may be, but that's not what you I thought you were saying
The way I read it was that nobody else in the movies besides Rooker had ever done anything that people would remember them for other than the GOTG movie, and I was just pointing out that they've all done a lot of other well known, popular things. I wasn't saying anything about how long they've been acting or how good of an actor they are.
OK, now I understand.Then you misunderstood.
The point about Rooker is that he--above the rest of the named actors--has been celebrated for many performances for more than three decades, so if anyone from a GOTG film would be a true acting asset to a DC movie, it is Rooker.
Well, that's a cesspool.So, with about a month and a half to go until the release of Shazam 2, Zachary Levi seems (and it may be that he meant something else) to have outed himself as an anti-vaxxer. Of course, this sort of controversy from a leading actor didn’t do BP:WF any harm but I can’t imagine that WB are delighted:
https://twitter.com/zacharylevi/status/1619599266607169539?s=61&t=aDhQxN4vgZYZMxELX_jjgQ
Gunn and Safran were adamant that films and series will not go into production until scripts are finished, which is not the norm for pricey tentpoles that need to create awareness by planting flags on the calendar.
As noted, the book was controversial among Supergirl fans, so I'm sure some will be less than enthusiastic at the prospect of a film adaptation, but personally, I'm over the moon.So I just belatedly read Tom King's Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, and I thought it was astonishing. One of the better DC graphic novels I've ever read.
I remember some grousing from fans when the miniseries was coming out that Kara is shown getting drunk, cursing (a lot), and generally not acting like a perfect paragon of virtue at every moment. To me, that's a case of missing the point by miles. For all her rougher personal edges, King's Kara ends up being one of the more genuinely heroic and inspiring versions of the character ever presented, IMO.
In a way, it's a lot like what I've heard many times about Man of Steel from that film's fans -- that Clark's difficulties and uncertainties make him more heroic, not less. In Woman of Tomorrow, Kara's struggles and pain are foregrounded, but it just makes her shine more brightly when she perseveres and overcomes and inspires -- which she very explicitly does here, in a way that had me setting the book aside to wipe away tears before continuing.
King's Superman: Up in the Sky has received much praise, and rightly so, but I think Woman of Tomorrow is even better. And Bilquis Evely's art is simply gorgeous, making the book a treat for the eyes as well as for the mind and spirit. Very highly recommended.
Though weird that some actors are allowed to continue if they chose but Cavill is a hard no? Not sure what the decision regarding that is. Unless they're THAT mad at Johnson's shenanigans regarding bring him back maybe?
Much here to look forward to, if it’s all handled well (we’ve been here before admittedly). It looks like this take on Batman will be distinct enough from The Batman to avoid confusion for casual audiences, while the rest is a nice mix of the expected and unexpected. The other behind the scenes names so far bode well and I’m looking forward to seeing who they cast and who they get (or approach) to direct.
I'm pumped.
Though weird that some actors are allowed to continue if they chose but Cavill is a hard no? Not sure what the decision regarding that is. Unless they're THAT mad at Johnson's shenanigans regarding bring him back maybe?
I'm not sure what to make of the idea of the Amazon prequel series being "Game of Thrones-ish." If that means it's grim, dark, and ultraviolent, I'm not on board. On the other hand, if it means it'll have lots of sex and nudity on an all-female island, then I'm all for it.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.