• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Witcher - Netflix

That's common sense. Still i don't like Elves beeing turned in to dwarves. Could have come up with some new version of Elves, if they had no lore to base it off.
Haven't seen the show yet, but it sounds like they did. You just don't like their version.
 
Last edited:
To date, this seems like Schmidt's biggest job as a Producer so she probably has a lot riding on it. She previously worked on The Umbrella Academy which I like, but I'm not familiar with the source material-- and prior to that she did Season 2 of Daredevil and The Defenders, so she is comfortable taking strong differing paths from the source material.
I have not watched the show or read the books or played the games of The Witcher but The Umbrella Academy takes some large liberties from the source comics. That one seems to have been generally well regarded from what I’ve seen.

i was thinking of checking out Blood Origin if it can be watched standalone from the others.
 
I haven't watched it yet, but Blood Origin's set 1200 before the original series, so I have a feeling it's probably not too tightly connected it.
 
Making male heroes with real emotions and actual substance is not feminising. It's making realistic characters.


Yeah, exactly. There's a balance to everything, ie depth and nuance making for more interesting characters. The character of Geralt may be a gruff individual, but he does have his delicate side, which should never count as a negative. If a grown man cries, it doesn't make them any less a man. It just means he's letting his emotions show. Never a bad thing.

As for me, I am really uncertain if I will tune in for the Witcher beyond Season 3 if it continues to diverge from the source material. I am also wary of watching series on Netflix now, as it seems just making it into the top ten shows for a month is not enough to get a show renewed--and I'm tired of watching shows that just end after a season or two. I'm actually thinking of investing my time in series that I wasn't able to get around to watching when they were released and I know have proper endings.

I've enjoyed seasons 1 and 2, but for me watching beyond season 3 will depend entirely if Liam Helmsworth will be up to the task, or if it will be too much of a disconnect. My fear is that he'll just be a pawn into her agenda of going further off-course.

See, I hate how they've chosen how to handle this. Rather than treating Cavill as an ally with a love for the material that could have helped produce a better show, he's ousted as a nerd who's too passionate for the material. In any other world, this would be a great thing, something they could have used to their advantage. Someone that had a love for the material that ends up getting thrown under the bus. Would it have been so bad for them to maybe lend an ear? Instead it seems like the showrunner wants to do her own thing, which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing in normal circumstances, but what it sounds like she needs her own original show to work with where she can set the parameters rather than something already established.

It's going to be very interesting to see the results from Liam's run with the character or whether there'll be more trouble on the set.
 
That's one of my points --dwarfs and elfs were not really differentiated as unique fantasy races--

EDIT: I should also mention that the Elves and Dwarves in The Witcher series are based on Sapkowski's portrayal of them in the novels -- I don't know enough about Eastern European Lore, but it wouldn't surprise me if they are based on stories from that region.
 
I've finally learned to stop getting upset about adaptations diverging from the source material, and to just accept them for what they are. There are very few long running adaptations that actually stick to the source material all the way through.
 
See, I hate how they've chosen how to handle this. Rather than treating Cavill as an ally with a love for the material that could have helped produce a better show, he's ousted as a nerd who's too passionate for the material. In any other world, this would be a great thing, something they could have used to their advantage. Someone that had a love for the material that ends up getting thrown under the bus. Would it have been so bad for them to maybe lend an ear? Instead it seems like the showrunner wants to do her own thing, which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing in normal circumstances, but what it sounds like she needs her own original show to work with where she can set the parameters rather than something already established.

I don't know if this had been posted before or not, I didn't see it looking back so apologies if it was, but it sounds messy so I don't know if we've heard the whole story or not.

From https://www.nme.com/features/tv-int...lood-origin-interview-netflix-spinoff-3366830:
Did Cavill, a book devotee, put his foot down and demand no more changes to the source material? Or was it a simple schedule clash with his proposed (and since cancelled) return as Superman? Naturally, we ask Hissrich.

“We’re going to try and talk about that next year,” comes the firm reply, not from Hissrich, but a strategically placed publicist sitting in on the call. They seem to have expected the question.

“That’s exactly what I was going to say!” chips in Hissrich. “I do have a lot to say and I think that there’s a lot of, you know… we’ll obviously never get into exactly why Henry left, all of the reasons, but I can say it’s been a mutually respectful relationship… So please, please, please come back in six months when we can talk.”
 
Yeah, messy is certainly a good way of putting it. If for example, it's as if she says in that it's been mutually respectful, then the whole bruhaha about him being disrespectful should be put to bed. The more and more I hear about it, the more it sounds like someone on the sidelines who's been unhappy with him and spreading rumours. I'm glad there are those who worked with him that have come forward to say they've had good experiences with him.
 
“We’re going to try and talk about that next year,” comes the firm reply, not from Hissrich, but a strategically placed publicist sitting in on the call. They seem to have expected the question.

“That’s exactly what I was going to say!” chips in Hissrich. “I do have a lot to say and I think that there’s a lot of, you know… we’ll obviously never get into exactly why Henry left, all of the reasons, but I can say it’s been a mutually respectful relationship… So please, please, please come back in six months when we can talk.”
"We're obviously never ever going to tell you what you want to know, but definitely come back in six months and ask us again!" :shrug:
 
Maybe it's a pure stalling tactic, I guess we'll see. Here's hoping wherever Cavill ends up (Warhammer 40K?) he's happy to be there and they're happy to have him. I think we'd all like that for ourselves.
 
I've finally learned to stop getting upset about adaptations diverging from the source material, and to just accept them for what they are. There are very few long running adaptations that actually stick to the source material all the way through.

And I can see having to make changes for budget and pacing reasons. There's no way Ciri was going to be wandering around a desert on her own for three episodes for both those reasons, for example. Season 1 was fairly faithful to the stories, so I was expecting Season 2 to be similar--but instead Season 2 cherry picked scenes from Blood of Elves and Time of Contempt and then threw in twists all its own that seemed to fundamentally change the characters. This is why I asked back when it was airing if the season was taking material from other books as well.

Sure, adaptations need to make changes and they can be done well. The recent season of His Dark Materials did a really good job of that. The Umbrella Academy does a pretty good job of using the source material as a jumping off point. Westworld was an enjoyable adaptation that used the novel as a very loose foundation for its story.
 
Wow, Blood Origin wasn't to my liking at all, i seriously couldn't even get past 1 episode. When the Elf by the name Fjall Stoneheart ( seriously?) said " Aye " i truned it off. I don't know what kind of elves are in the Witcher, but this one sounded like a dwarf to me.
I want to just say everyone is entitled to their own opinion and leave it at that, but your reasoning is so shallow and ridiculous that it makes it difficult. Well, I guess it's a plus that you're no longer whining about the show being feminized.

So what's the problem? Because the name has "Stone" in it, you assume it's a dwarf name? Please enlighten us on what a real elf name would consist of.

The actor playing Fjall is from Ireland. Some parts of the island (especially the North) often say "Aye" for "Yes", as they more commonly do in Scotland. Jonathan Rhys-Davies, who playe Gimli in LotR, is from Wales, where "Aye" is also sometimes used. It's entirely possible the two actors are just using their own words there.

Regardless, who shuts off a show in disgust after hearing a name and the word "Aye"? I've heard of some lame reasons for not watching a show any more, but that takes the cake.
 
Please, everyone... take it easy and back off from being so personal. I am temporarily locking the thread to allow the better angels of our nature to prevail.
 
Yeah, messy is certainly a good way of putting it. If for example, it's as if she says in that it's been mutually respectful, then the whole bruhaha about him being disrespectful should be put to bed. The more and more I hear about it, the more it sounds like someone on the sidelines who's been unhappy with him and spreading rumours. I'm glad there are those who worked with him that have come forward to say they've had good experiences with him.

We won't know the actual reason until way later if that, i.e, when one or both parties have retired from showbusiness and feel like writing their memoirs. No actor or producer currently working will talk openly about such an event because it's a career killer. Actors get a reputation for being difficult ( and with lesser status than Cavill may even get blacklisted) while Producers won't get new projects if they run such a big project into the ground.

All they say is PR speech at the moment if they say anything at all and it's no different that in any other job. I have recently quit my job but i will refuse to talk about the real reasons with anyone, only HR and my bosses know it and it will stay there.

Maybe it's a pure stalling tactic, I guess we'll see. Here's hoping wherever Cavill ends up (Warhammer 40K?) he's happy to be there and they're happy to have him. I think we'd all like that for ourselves.

Warhammer 40K is a done deal and maybe even more of a passion project for him than Witcher ( he's been following that universe for much longer than Witcher). As he's a ( the?) producer of that universe he will have much creative control but he'll also be responsible if it turns to crap. He lucked out twice to get passion projects and even if one turned sour it's more than many of us can say when it comes to our jobs.
 
All they say is PR speech at the moment if they say anything at all and it's no different that in any other job. I have recently quit my job but i will refuse to talk about the real reasons with anyone, only HR and my bosses know it and it will stay there.

There hasn't even been all that much PR speech about it either. Most of what we know comes from an unsubstantiated source full of he-said/she-said conjecture which may not even have anything to it, other than an intent to spread malicious rumours.
 
Watched Blood Origin and I get why some people might find it terrible, because... it kinda is, but I found it rather enjoyable as pure shlock.

The tonal shifts between ridiculous and serious (and I use the term loosely) are jarring at times, the plot is simplistic, the characters are more caricatures and Minnie Driver is barely in it, but it's entertaining enough and only 4 episodes long so it gets a passing grade from me.
 
Finished Blood Origins today. That was terrible. Reminded me of the cheap early 2000's made for TV fantasy stuff, after Hercules and Xena but before CGI got cheap and decent.
 
How many of the people who didn't like Blood Origin like the main Witcher series? I'm just curious if it's a matter of people not liking the whole franchise or Blood Origin being worse than the main show.
 
How many of the people who didn't like Blood Origin like the main Witcher series? I'm just curious if it's a matter of people not liking the whole franchise or Blood Origin being worse than the main show.

I enjoyed the first season. The second season was a big step down. But both were waaaaayyyyyy better, and much less cheesy, than Blood Origins.
 
I haven't watched Blood Origin yet--but my complaint about the second season was that it diverged so much from the books that I thought it included elements from the books I hadn't read at the time. I thought that it did the same thing that Game of Thrones did--once it went off and did its own thing the show's writers demonstrated that they just weren't capable of living up to the quality of the source material.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top