• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trek guest actors in maybe surprising roles

Grammar nitpick: Alumni is plural. There's just her, so she's an alumna, or gender-neutral alum. Go back to your activities.

Specifically, it's masculine plural. Masculine: singular alumnus, plural alumni. Feminine: singular alumna, plural alumnae. For non-binary graduates, I suppose the closest thing would be neuter endings, alumnum/alumna.
 
But would the show have been as successful had Steven Hill stayed on in the lead role. If he hadn't been fired at the end of the first season for his outburst during the filming of the episode "Action!" and came back for the second, his screen time would have most likely been limited to the tape, dossier, and apartment scenes and possibly the finale, because of his contract which said he had to leave the set each Friday before sundown to attend prayers in accordance to his Orthodox religion and would not return to work until the following Monday. It's highly doubtful that Steven Hill would have been the one dangling from the helicopter like Peter Graves did; it might be Martin Landau in that role, but then who takes over Martin's role? Is it a series of "one shot" special guest stars? And is the studio/network willing to pay a leading man salary to someone's who's screen time is limited to 5-10 minutes? There's a cascade effect that has to be considered.

I didn't know Hill was Jewish! That would explain why our Judaiophile found him as hot as Landau and Nimoy. :)

Here's why I like Hill better than Graves (at least so far):

1) Hill is kind of a nebbish. I feel like agents should be nebbishes. Agents that stand out get made. Also, it was a fascinating contradiction: nebbish who is also a leader. And when Dan got mad, it looked serious.

2) Having less screen time meant less danger of the show becoming the Peter Graves show. Again, I've only seen two episodes of the second season AND I DON'T WANT SPOILERS, PLEASE. What I really enjoy about the 1st season is the ensemble nature of it. While we, the viewers, didn't understand why Hill was so often absent, it led to great things like Cinnamon getting the briefing once, and the other players getting to do more.

3) Hill's apartment was amazing. Graves' apartment is unimpressive.

4) Series of "one shot" special guest stars would be kind of amazing. The cool thing about Season 1 was never knowing who the team would be. It felt like it was always being made ad hoc anew.

Maybe the show will be just fine. After all, it goes on until the mid-70s. And the newspapers were not at all flattering to Hill after he left.

Again, PLEASE NO SPOILERS. :)
 
4) Series of "one shot" special guest stars would be kind of amazing. The cool thing about Season 1 was never knowing who the team would be. It felt like it was always being made ad hoc anew.

I wish they had committed more fully to the variable team compositions. Like, instead of having one master of disguise do all the impersonations, bring in a different person every time, chosen for their resemblance to the subject. That's how Rollin was chosen in the pilot -- he was brought in because he was a good match for the targeted dictator (also played by Landau, of course). It loses credibility when he (or Paris) impersonates everyone. (And it led to the show casting Paul Stevens as the guy Rollin impersonated on three separate occasions, because they resembled each other.)

I mean, part of the reason for the M:I format was to go for an anthology feel by having the actors adopt different personas and roles every week. It would've been even more anthology-like if there had been only one regular team leader recruiting different guest agents every week, or at least if it had had a mix of one-shot guests and intermittently recurring semi-regulars, like in season 1 only more so.
 
I can't say this enough - If you can get your hands on a copy of "The Complete 'Mission: Impossible' Dossier", either through eBay, Half Price Books, or some other retailers, you won't be disappointed.
 
I wish they had committed more fully to the variable team compositions. Like, instead of having one master of disguise do all the impersonations, bring in a different person every time, chosen for their resemblance to the subject. That's how Rollin was chosen in the pilot -- he was brought in because he was a good match for the targeted dictator (also played by Landau, of course). It loses credibility when he (or Paris) impersonates everyone. (And it led to the show casting Paul Stevens as the guy Rollin impersonated on three separate occasions, because they resembled each other.)

I mean, part of the reason for the M:I format was to go for an anthology feel by having the actors adopt different personas and roles every week. It would've been even more anthology-like if there had been only one regular team leader recruiting different guest agents every week, or at least if it had had a mix of one-shot guests and intermittently recurring semi-regulars, like in season 1 only more so.

Again, without spoiling anything, a lot of the first season episodes were written with guest spies in mind, but they were written out and replaced with Rolin, because, as producer Joseph Gantman and the writers interviewed for the book, it was simply easier to write for one character who was good at many things than many who were good at only one. Landau even acknowledges in the book that he was getting parts that should have been going to someone else, but he wasn't about to turn down a $5000 paycheck per episode.
 
Again, without spoiling anything, a lot of the first season episodes were written with guest spies in mind, but they were written out and replaced with Rolin, because, as producer Joseph Gantman and the writers interviewed for the book, it was simply easier to write for one character who was good at many things than many who were good at only one. Landau even acknowledges in the book that he was getting parts that should have been going to someone else, but he wasn't about to turn down a $5000 paycheck per episode.

Yeah, you can see that in the early episodes, how each one was written around a central guest star. In the pilot it was Landau, of course. "Memory" was written around Albert Paulsen's character. "Operation: Rogosh" centered on Fritz Weaver as the titular villain. "Old Man Out" showcased Mary Ann Mobley (to my great enjoyment). But once you get to things like "Wheels" and "A Spool There Was," they're getting written around Rollin again.

Star Trek kind of went the same way. Roddenberry overtly said he planned to emulate Wagon Train's anthology-like focus on guest stars of the week, and you can see that with things like "Where No Man..." focusing on Mitchell and Dehner, "The Corbomite Maneuver" centering on Dave Bailey's arc, "Mudd's Women" centering on Harry and Eve, and "Charlie X" being self-explanatory. But then Spock became the breakout character and the stories started to emphasize him more, with Roddenberry and Shatner insisting on keeping Kirk equally central, and McCoy becoming the third member of the triumvirate by virtue of his relationships to the other two. So it became more focused on the leads than on the guest stars as originally planned.

Coincidental that it happened with Landau and Nimoy simultaneously, given that Nimoy replaced Landau on M:I, and given the longstanding but now-debunked rumors that Landau was offered the role of Spock before Nimoy. (I think it was more that he was on a list of alternate candidates, but Nimoy was always the first choice.)
 
Yeah, you can see that in the early episodes, how each one was written around a central guest star. In the pilot it was Landau, of course. "Memory" was written around Albert Paulsen's character. "Operation: Rogosh" centered on Fritz Weaver as the titular villain. "Old Man Out" showcased Mary Ann Mobley (to my great enjoyment). But once you get to things like "Wheels" and "A Spool There Was," they're getting written around Rollin again.

Star Trek kind of went the same way. Roddenberry overtly said he planned to emulate Wagon Train's anthology-like focus on guest stars of the week, and you can see that with things like "Where No Man..." focusing on Mitchell and Dehner, "The Corbomite Maneuver" centering on Dave Bailey's arc, "Mudd's Women" centering on Harry and Eve, and "Charlie X" being self-explanatory. But then Spock became the breakout character and the stories started to emphasize him more, with Roddenberry and Shatner insisting on keeping Kirk equally central, and McCoy becoming the third member of the triumvirate by virtue of his relationships to the other two. So it became more focused on the leads than on the guest stars as originally planned.

Coincidental that it happened with Landau and Nimoy simultaneously, given that Nimoy replaced Landau on M:I, and given the longstanding but now-debunked rumors that Landau was offered the role of Spock before Nimoy. (I think it was more that he was on a list of alternate candidates, but Nimoy was always the first choice.)

I think that's what makes the 1st season of Trek stand out. I'm enjoying the second season, but I don't like the increasing focus on The Big Three (which never, ever ends...)
 
I think that's what makes the 1st season of Trek stand out. I'm enjoying the second season, but I don't like the increasing focus on The Big Three (which never, ever ends...)

At least it's not as bad as the way Dr. Smith totally took over Lost in Space. I mean, at least Kirk and Spock were the nominal lead characters from the start. What happened with LiS was more like if Harry Mudd had supplanted Kirk as the main character.
 
At least it's not as bad as the way Dr. Smith totally took over Lost in Space. I mean, at least Kirk and Spock were the nominal lead characters from the start. What happened with LiS was more like if Harry Mudd had supplanted Kirk as the main character.

Star Trek: Mothers in Law
 
Watching Gunsmoke in order for the first time, it's striking how much the focus shifted to guest star stories in season seven with the change to hour-long episodes. While the character "bantering" scenes among the four regulars often felt like a time-out in the half-hour episodes, in the full hour they seem even more set apart, contrasting with the focus on a guest character storyline. I'm interested to see how it develops in later seasons.

Usually TOS big three incidental dialogue is fairly well integrated, but I find Gunsmoke's is better written and more enjoyable. That may have developed from the cast, too, who were said to have close friendships offscreen.
 
Watched the 1963 Vincent Price/Roger Corman horror film "Haunted Palace" yesterday on Amazon Prime. And right at the start, there was weasely barfly Elsha Cook, seeing a ghost.
hauntedcook.jpg
 
Nichelle Nichols is one of the celebrity guests on 'Super Password' this evening on Buzr.
Aside from Shatner, I wasn't aware of any other 'Star Trek' alumni appearing on game shows.
 
Nichelle Nichols is one of the celebrity guests on 'Super Password' this evening on Buzr.

I remember her guest stint there. It's the first time I heard her mention "Nyota" as Uhura's first name, the first time I heard it spoken aloud (though she said it as "Nigh-oh-tah" rather than "N-yo-tah" as it's been pronounced in Kelvin and SNW).

I still remember the one where William Christopher's partner was bewildered when he used "Charybdis" as a clue for "whirlpool." (In retrospect, I wonder if that was a deliberate schtick. I guess "reality" TV has made me doubt that anything in unscripted television is truly spontaneous or authentic.)
 
Last week yielded two Joan Collins appearances (the 9-23-67 Virginian and 9-21-67 Batman):


670923virginian.jpg


"One day soon man is going to be able to harness incredible energies, maybe even crude oil. Energies that could ultimately hurl us to other cities in some sort of self-propelled buggy. And the men that reach out across the country will be able to find ways to feed the hungry millions of the world and to cure their diseases. They will be able to find a way to give each man hope and a common future, and those are the days worth living for."

670921batman.jpg


"Well, maybe not..."
 
Here's a funny one and in line with the long-ago forgotten original intent of this thread: a Star Trek guest actor in a "surprising role".

It's Morgan "Simon Van Gelder/Capt. Tracey" Woodward as he appeared as Andy Renko's dad on Hill Street Blues over several 2nd season episodes.

But that's not the surprising part. In the episode "Invasion of the Third World Body Snatchers" Woodward appears in a single scene, as the accidentally-heisted corpse of said dad. His only action is to flop over from being propped up against a wall in an alley, and then to roll his face into a hat when Joe Coffee releases his shoulder.

Screenshot 2022-09-27 12.41.45 AM.png

Probably the easiest role he ever played. :D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top