• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 2x07 - "Monsters"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    218
Because it was exceedingly uninteresting. Oh, and that other "big" revelation. You know. Where we thought Talinn was Romulan. Well, she turned out to be . . . Romulan. Wow.

Meanwhile, the other plots are just on the backburner. Borg Queen walking around smashing windows. Wow. Rios showing off his ship. Wow. Raffi and Seven not really doing much other than talking about how they're really the "show." Not even sure what that was supposed to mean.

We had the extraneous go nowhere plot point that the El Aurian were in a cold war with the Q Continuum. Not sure how that's possible but okay. And they sealed the moment of the truce in a bottle. And guess what, Guinan just happened to have that very bottle there in the bar with her! Wow. Extra amazing because she had closed the bar down. But the bottle didn't work. Darn. All that ridiculousness for nothing. Wow.

I supposed the big revelation over Picard's Daddy issue, which was just a mistake as it turns out, might amount to something because . . . "there's more to the story." But I'll believe that when I see it.

Careful, Owen Wilson is going to want some of his "wows" back.
 
Goodness knows the franchise could use some new fans to push aside those who do nothing but flood social media with hate.
I really think the haters are in the minority, with the loudest voices as per usual. I guess, for me, I'm just not a huge fan of how much serialized TV there is now.

But I've always preferred short stories to novels, another minority opinion.
 
You freakasaurus :nyah:
I appreciate a good novel, just think there's more artistry in short stories/novellas if they're done well. The perfect novel length is somewhere between 350-450 pages. And TV series start to show their cracks by Season 5. Etc. etc. etc.

Btw nice Rain Robinson reference.
 
Star Trek X-Files.
Now if only the FBI agent in 10 Forward was played by David Duchovny, Gillian Anderson, Annabeth Gish or Robert Patrick.....The truth is out there. :)

In the next episode will there be an interrogation scene where the FBI agent tells Picard "I'm going to lock you up for two hundred years" and Picard answers "that ought to be about right."
 
Last edited:
Why did they use 2 different boys when they both were about the same age? Not that I'm good at guessing ages in that range, but they both seem to be 12ish - perhaps one of them is Robert? :D

And omg heaven forbid a 96 year old guy has a love life (or rather, it's explained why he DOESN'T have one)... :shifty:
He's been waiting and saving it all... ...for you.

Only "teh Primeline" is true Trek!
We need the return of Shatner as the PRIME-LINE NE-GO-SHI-AY-DAH! chopping all alternate Trek to bits.

I'm just saying that its not an activity that jumps to mind when you hear the word endorphins. I mean I never heard of it and am trying to research it (breaking things + endorphins) but am failing to find anything online about it. I thought it would be more common for people to know about exercise for example as a way to generate endorphins. Also Agnes is no longer in control of her body, its the Borg Queen that is acting out in order to generate the endorphins, and if thats the case she has enough knowledge to know better ways to do it, at least thats my take on it.
Pleasant dream endorphins attract parasitic infections, nightmare endorphins repel them. ;)
 
Depending how society falls apart before the Red rockets fly in 2053... What happens to the prison industrial complex when the government stops paying the guards?

1. No one opens the cells. All the guards go, and all the prisoners die of dehydration and starvation even if they can stay that by drinking each others pee for a couple weeks.

2. No one opens the cells. The guards leave but the smartest criminals break out of the unmonitored cells, and then rampage on the surrounding countryside.

3. The guards open the cells. No prison sentence in America, even life sentences extend beyond 2025.
 
Last edited:
He's been waiting and saving it all... ...for you.

Oh I wish, believe me. I'd be with him IN AN INSTANT if he wanted me, no questions asked (especially not about his feelings, I'd be way too afraid that he asks me about mine in return, lol). I mean broken/tormented people that have been through traumatic hell when they were young HAVE been known to heal each other because they understand each other without words. Ugh I sound like one of those romance novel authors :shifty::lol:
 
That only works on the assumption that older Trek is consistently better written, which I wouldn't agree with. I'm an "older fan" and would gladly take the average Picard episode over the average TNG episode (let alone Voyager and Enterprise).

"Consistently" is not a virtue in and of itself, and matters a great deal more with McDonald's burgers than with narrative. It's true that current Trek manages a consistency - since the beginning of STD it's risen from usually badly written with occasional heights of competence to consistently mediocre with random dips into laughable.

The original series was wildly uneven, with very bad episodes and a handful of truly brilliant stories that nothing since have quite achieved. If every series since then vanished, the virtues of the franchise as TV storytelling would be halved at worst.
 
It makes sense for Raffi because her actual son rejected her attempts at reconciliation, so over the past year and however long it's been Elnor has become her surrogate son and mentee at the Academy. She's also recovering from her addiction, and has sort of poured all her focus and energy into looking after Elnor as a coping mechanism, so losing him, even if only (hopefully) temporarily, has started to trigger the old urges and temptations again, all while having to deal with these incredibly stressful events.

Picard on the other hand, I don't think it's a lack of caring, because clearly he does, it's just that he's so mission oriented and singleminded that he can't grieve over Elnor yet because he's Jean-Luc Fucking Picard and he's going to restore the proper timeline and bring Elnor back to life. He doesn't accept that Elnor's gone because he doesn't accept the possibility of them failing their mission. Even though he's a more frail man than before, he's still got the same Picard (benevolent) arrogance and determination.

I do think that's a good explanation of Raffi's mental and emotional state, however with the majority of that relationship between her and Elnor happening off screen it does feel weird that she cares that much. I do think both actors did a lot to try to inject a deeper bond in "The Star Gazer" to try to sell it though.

As for Picard, I think you're talking more about TNG Picard than ST: PIC Picard. PIC Picard is much more regretful, mournful, and I don't see him as driven to get him back. If anything it should be Picard wracked by guilt that he failed Elnor once again, while Raffi would be more driven to bring him back. In season 1 we saw aspects of that driven nature, her putting her career over her family and then her going the conspiracy theory route (which ultimately turned out to be true). Even her drug abuse IMO stems from that kind of compulsiveness. Raffi has a kind of obsessive personality that fixates on things, so I could see her actually being more focused than Admiral Picard on restoring the proper future. While Picard still is determined, he doesn't have the same drive IMO and definitely not the same energy as he once did. It's Jean-Luc who should be having the hallucinations.
 
Isn't that "TIME TRAX"?

Yes, they are both very good shows, and the same show, that I have both rewatched recently.

Home made VHS rips can be found of Time Trax in the usual places.

Lets compare for the cheap seats.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I really don't understand people who are saying this episode slammed on the brakes when it was a direct answer to the questions regarding Picard's character from the first episode.

Literally the first elements introduced chronologically - before Q, before the timeline shift, before the Borg - was the question regarding the childhood trauma which led to Picard's fear of commitment. This episode may not have answered it as adroitly as would be desired, but it was payoff for seeds planted in the season premier.
It slammed on the brakes of a lot of plot wheels currently spinning to go back to psychobabbledrama that I was never interested in.
 
Hmmm... just watched this weeks episode. I've loved this series to date, but this episode really felt like a filler. The childhood trauma thing just really felt forced and frankly needless to the plot (To my knowledge Picard hasn't really shown signs of being affected by his past in previous episodes of Star Trek, other than looking understandably taken aback when his Maman showed up in Where No One Has Gone Before), Tallinn being an ancestor of Laris feels like a massive coincidence and the magic bottle thing was a bit silly as well. (Have we had an on-screen reason as to why Guinan doesn't recognise Picard, despite the events of Times Arrow?)

But that was the negatives. As for the positives, James Callis was excellent and I loved the ending when Jay Karnes showed up - It would be a fantastic twist if that's the same character as the one he played in Relativity!

To be honest, they could have saved themselves a few dollars by not making this episode and tacking the cliff-hanger on the end of last weeks episode and we would barely have noticed the difference.
 
I have a friend who even now is insisting that the character played by that Callis guy is actually supposed to be Doctor Bashir. :shrug:

I've seen Terry Matalas answering someone's question about this with "because Dr. Bashir isn't Picard's father". His tweet sounded a little exasperated, and I honestly can't blame him. It's one thing when people get confused at first, but a LOT of hate-watchers are deliberately refusing to understand what's going on and are insisting on their "alternative Trek facts" because they fit into their narrative of "this show is ruining Star Trek".
 
Wow, this has to be the most evenly spread out Picard ep poll yet. The episode's getting the full range of opinions.

Yup, can confirm, my Sir Patrick sources say the same, they reflect the opinions on this board. Some say the episode was atrocious, others love it, and some say it's one of those episodes that need to be watched within the context of the whole season. (The usual suspects are up in arms against it, of course, but then, they are ALWAYS up in arms, no matter what the show does. lol)
 
I've seen Terry Matalas answering someone's question about this with "because Dr. Bashir isn't Picard's father". His tweet sounded a little exasperated, and I honestly can't blame him. It's one thing when people get confused at first, but a LOT of hate-watchers are deliberately refusing to understand what's going on and are insisting on their "alternative Trek facts" because they fit into their narrative of "this show is ruining Star Trek".
i have no idea on why would he be bashir.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top