• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A Practical Timeline

Falconer

Commander
Red Shirt
I created this timeline because I am running a RPG and I thought it would be helpful to know how long ago a given event took place. Hence I titled it a “practical” timeline of TOS/TAS. It’s not canon, it’s more headcanon, but even in my head it’s not canon, if you know what I mean. It’s just close enough to make sense, while not too rigorous as to make the project un-fun.

For TOS, I based the dates on the first filmdate of the episode (I ignored the stated Stardate). I then expanded the passage of time by a certain factor. I then added in a gap between Court Martial and The Menagerie, since it seems in the latter they return to Star Base 11 after some time away. A second gap accounts for the time that lapses within The Paradise Syndrome. The expansion factor and the gap lengths were somewhat arbitrary but allowed me to sync up some things in a way which tickle my fancy. Some additional considerations are noted.

The date of The Cage is not based on filmdate at all, but necessarily dated in relation to The Menagerie.











For TAS, the plan is to follow ADF’s novelizations. Since he has gone to the work of weaving a consistent story, I might as well stick with it. This is somewhat of a work in progress, however, as I need to actually read those books rather than rely on the scant info I could find on the internet.

I am somewhat agnostic as to what the actual range of years should be. As with my SFTM Timeline, I have created variations of the above timeline calculated such that Errand of Mercy takes place in the year 2208, 2261, 2267, and 2556, respectively, as established in the various canons. (I kind of like them all.)
 
For TAS, the plan is to follow ADF’s novelizations. Since he has gone to the work of weaving a consistent story, I might as well stick with it. This is somewhat of a work in progress, however, as I need to actually read those books rather than rely on the scant info I could find on the internet.

Cool! You have happy reading ahead of you. :)
 
Question: Since I have never read the ADF's novelizations for TAS, is that timeline "better" than production order since you stayed so rigid to it for TOS? Seems to mixing apples and oranges given may other projects (including airdates) exist for TOS, too. Also, if you keep TAS production order, the Christmas party still happens at the same time. I don't understand the important of The Turnabout Intruder and a four year "anniversary" reference to The Corbomite Maneuver?

(P.S. typo, you have two #80's, the Slaver Weapon is #90.) :)
 
By and large, I like the Star Trek Chronology (1993). It puts "The Cage" in 2253 and starts the first season off in 2266. So I think you're marching to your own drummer. :bolian:
 
I like it! I found it immediately accessible without getting too bogged down in minutiae. I mean, there's a time and place for the latter . . . but not just now.

Is there significance to the dates of the Earth years you chose?
 
Question: Since I have never read the ADF's novelizations for TAS, is that timeline "better" than production order since you stayed so rigid to it for TOS?
I will read them and report back!

I don't understand the important of The Turnabout Intruder and a four year "anniversary" reference to The Corbomite Maneuver?
That’s one of my “tickles my fancy” things. The Captain gets the same physical in both episodes. Granted it’s a quarterly physical, not an annual one, but I thought since it was such an intentional hark back that it would be neat if each one kicks of a year of adventures.

(P.S. typo, you have two #80's, the Slaver Weapon is #90.) :)
Thanks, I will verify and correct it!
 
Is there significance to the dates of the Earth years you chose?
In my actual spreadsheet I can plug in any year and it will calculate everything out accordingly. I’m interested in a lot of different Star Trek literature of varying degrees of officialness, and I like to be fluent in them all. Many dates have been posited for the Organian Treaty, such as 2208 (Spaceflight Chronology/FASA), 2261 (Star Trek Maps and many Blueprints and Technical Manuals of the 1970s-90s), 2267 (that’s the official or at least “Memory Alpha” one now), and 2556 (SFU). I can post some of these variants if it would interest anyone. I don’t really have a strong opinion on the matter, I just need actual years to work with so I can account for the date of Thanksgiving (presumably U.S. Thanksgiving according to the way it is currently calculated), leap years, etc.
 
Many dates have been posited for the Organian Treaty, such as 2208 (Spaceflight Chronology/FASA), 2261 (Star Trek Maps and many Blueprints and Technical Manuals of the 1970s-90s), 2267 (that’s the official or at least “Memory Alpha” one now), and 2556 (SFU)

Thanks. Yeah, see, I didn't even know that Star Trek Maps showed a date for the Organian Treaty. 2208 makes no sense and 2556 - huh? And what is SFU, anyway?

The very fact that Star Trek chronologies tend to bore me - and yet I not only clicked on the thread but enjoyed yours - shows, if I may be so bold, that you succeeded in your stated goal of accessibility. :bolian: That is, creating something not too "rigorous" as to make it "un-fun," as you very aptly put it. One audience member, at least, says, "We . . . reach, Mr. Spock." :D
 
Thanks. Yeah, see, I didn't even know that Star Trek Maps showed a date for the Organian Treaty. 2208 makes no sense and 2556 - huh? And what is SFU, anyway?

The very fact that Star Trek chronologies tend to bore me - and yet I not only clicked on the thread but enjoyed yours - shows, if I may be so bold, that you succeeded in your stated goal of accessibility. :bolian: That is, creating something not too "rigorous" as to make it "un-fun," as you very aptly put it. One audience member, at least, says, "We . . . reach, Mr. Spock." :D
SFU: Sci-Fi Universe? The magazine maybe?

I'm like you: chronologies are dull as dirt for me since the original series took place "in the future" sometime. Either the 22nd, 23rd or 28th century. It wasn't about, say, "23rd century humans" but about "today's humans in the future" or something like that according to The Making of Star Trek. I don't really care when it all takes place as long as it's fun visiting.

Having said that, I enjoyed the original post more than I expected. Well done.
 
SFU: Sci-Fi Universe? The magazine maybe?

I'm like you: chronologies are dull as dirt for me since the original series took place "in the future" sometime. Either the 22nd, 23rd or 28th century. It wasn't about, say, "23rd century humans" but about "today's humans in the future" or something like that according to The Making of Star Trek. I don't really care when it all takes place as long as it's fun visiting.

Having said that, I enjoyed the original post more than I expected. Well done.

Oh, Sci-Fi Universe. Hnh, good guess. Falconer will clear up what he meant, I'm sure. In any event, whatever that source is, I'm not sure how it got around the blessed opening shot of The Wrath of Khan reading "IN THE 23RD CENTURY...". (Disregard for the moment that Kirk's notation in the same film of the Romulan Ale bottle's date still doesn't fit - at least that's buried in one line of dialogue that people probably explain away by saying the Romulans date things differently, or something, and it isn't the first thing one sees in the movie, with zero ambiguity :lol:.)

Other than that, yeah - chronologies don't really grab me. But this one did, for whatever reason.
 
SFU is the Star Fleet Universe, the setting of Star Fleet Battles and some other games. They spun off from the mainline Star Trek continuity sometime before TWoK. Their dating might have been influenced by The Squire of Gothos (“you've been looking in on the doings nine hundred years past”), but that should place it in the 27th century, not the 26th.

The 2208 dating might have been influenced by Space Seed (“You have two hundred years of catching up to do”).

Based on the production memos printed in The Making of Star Trek, I think the general guidance that came down from Roddenberry was “23rd Century,” but otherwise writers were on their own (or screwed it up, as in The Squire of Gothos), and some thought in terms of 2200 and some thought in terms of three centuries from now. Cf. Miri (“Earth as it was in … approximately 1960 … about three hundred years”).
 
Oh, Sci-Fi Universe. Hnh, good guess. Falconer will clear up what he meant, I'm sure. In any event, whatever that source is, I'm not sure how it got around the blessed opening shot of The Wrath of Khan reading "IN THE 23RD CENTURY...". (Disregard for the moment that Kirk's notation in the same film of the Romulan Ale bottle's date still doesn't fit - at least that's buried in one line of dialogue that people probably explain away by saying the Romulans date things differently, or something, and it isn't the first thing one sees in the movie, with zero ambiguity :lol:.)

Other than that, yeah - chronologies don't really grab me. But this one did, for whatever reason.

It's divorced from subsequent kaka, for one thing. :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top