You're right. I'm not a longtime fan. I am, however, a fan of all of Who, having seen the entirety of the show and attempted to view portions of the era again with audio stories slotted in for an added viewing/listening experience. I still don't like the Chibnall era.Feel free to show me where I said that. Moffat had higher highs than Chibnall, sure. But also much lower lows. And more of them. Moffat was peaks and valleys. Chibnall's first two seasons, for me, maintained a pretty consistent competent but not mindblowing level.
I'm also curious how many of the Moffat rules/Chibnall drools brigade are longtime fans. You can easily find runs of episodes in 1963-89 Doctor Who that make Chibnall look like high art. Twenty years from now I don't think anyone's going to be talking about the Chibnall era as one of the low points in the show's history.
Also, I would like to know which episode of Chibnall's are "high art" comparerd to OldWho, especially considering that each piece of entertainment was made in its own era and has added benefits to adjective quality of production/writing. I can see an argument for, maybe, Twin Dilemma and maybe even Warriors of the Deep in account of ghastly and horrendously made they are... but even then, the latter at the very least has Peter Davison being so utterly convincing in his plight to prevent a human/Silurian war from taking place, he alone makes it watchable to a degree, which is something I've never been able to say for Jodie Whittaker's case.