• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

h9QAqmF.gif
 
My Enterprise beauty rankings:

1. TOS 1701 and 1701-D (tie)
2. 1701-A
3. DIS 1701
4. 1701-E
5. NX-01 / Kelvin Timeline 1701 (tie)
6. 1701-B
7. 1701-C
8. 1701-J
9. Kelvin Timeline 1701-A

Edited to add:

Dishonorable mention to the 1701-F from Star Trek Online. I didn't include any non-canonical Enterprises, but if I did, it would rank below the Kelvin Timeline 1701-A.
 
I can't say I'm a huge fan of the DSC ships. They just look...weird. If an Enterprise turns up, I'm almost hoping they'll make it a bit of a throwback.

As for existing Enterprises, I freaking LOVE the DSC version of the 1701. I am so pumped for SNW, I think it's gonna become my favorite Trek series of all time (which ENT currently is). I don't really have huge opinions about the other Enterprises...except I wish the Ent-C was the original Andrew Probert Ambassador class, and I definitely wish the C had a decent bridge!

Although they have an easy out regarding the last bit: perhaps the bridge we saw in "Yesterday's Enterprise" was only the battle bridge.
 
The TOS Enterprise is my favorite by far, I'm biased because I grew up on TOS in the 60s/70s.

One thing I'll say about the E-D, Back in 1987 a little while before TNG started, the first time I saw a picture of the new Enterprise-D in some magazine, I at first thought a mistake had been made in the process of setting up the picture. I thought they had accidentally stretched it horizontally like the carnival mirrors that makes you look very short and wide.

I'm not kidding, I truly thought this the moment I saw it. After just a couple of seconds, I realized that there had been no mistake, the new ship really did look that way. But I wasn't certain until I saw another picture of it a few days later.

All I can say is look at the thing, it really is quite wide and flat.


Robert
 
Enterprise Beauty Rankings…

1701 (TOS)
1701/1701-A refit
NX-01
1701-E
1701-D
Discoprise
1701-C
1701-B
Kelvin 1701
Kelvin 1701-A
 
1. NCC-1701(TOS)
2. 1701 Refit/Enterprise-A
3. NX-01
4. NCC-1701(DSC)
5. Enterprise-B
6. Enterprise-C
7. Enterprise-D
8. Enterprise-E
9. NCC-1701(Kelvin Timeline)
10. NCC-1701-A(Kelvin Timeline)
 
This reminds me of my controversial Trek opinion: I don't care about the ships one bit.

Yeah. I like the look of some (1701, 1701-A, 1701-C, 1701-D, etc.), don't care for others (Kelvin 1701-A, those weird ones in Discovery that look like little saucers with bars through them), am indifferent to most (Defiant, Discovery, Excelsior, Cerritos, Stargazer, Reliant, etc.), but it doesn't really factor into my enjoyment of the show/movie/whatever.

I generally like the ships I list under indifferent, I just really don't care.
 
Yeah. I like the look of some (1701, 1701-A, 1701-C, 1701-D, etc.), don't care for others (Kelvin 1701-A, those weird ones in Discovery that look like little saucers with bars through them), am indifferent to most (Defiant, Discovery, Excelsior, Cerritos, Stargazer, Reliant, etc.), but it doesn't really factor into my enjoyment of the show/movie/whatever.

I generally like the ships I list under indifferent, I just really don't care.

Except in very rare cases the external features of the ship don't in any way relate to the plot of the week, and how a ship looks ultimately has zero bearing on the story.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top