Probably for its time but I still think its an interesting angle which should be explored in Star Trek. During that time the network didn't have that much interest in having Black people appearing to have some authority or power (Good or Bad), but again rewrites is the norm in the industry and again in order to have a better judgement of it I would have to read it myself. Still think it's an interesting concept.The premise of “A Portrait in Black and White” might at best be an interesting topic for a philosophical debate, as an actual episode it would have been in rather poor taste.
You don't take the plight of an entire part of the population that has been marginalised, oppressed, enslaved, discriminated against and killed throughout history here in the real world and make a mockery of it as an over-simplified thought experiment for your action adventure sci-fi show. I'm glad Trek dodged that particular bullet.
That’s nice to hear. I wondered momentarily before watching it if doing so would ruin the experience of reading the script but then thought, nah, the ‘book’s’ always better. It’s easier to like both when you watch the movie first. Can’t wait to read the script.
Me as well, what I saw from James Cawley was not interesting at all, but reading the written words of the original intent would something I can imagine in the tales proper place in Star Trek. Another thing, I'm wondering if the Klingon Wolfman appearance was described in the script or were they the Klingons from TOS?
Last edited: